MovieChat Forums > VonFisch > Replies
VonFisch's Replies
I've been watching older movies and almost every one has things in it I never noticed before, including potshots about "Republicans". This has been going on forever.
Thanks for playing...
No, there isn't unless the guy doesn't pull out in time before ejaculating if following the above. The sperm is not released beforehand.
I'm not sure. I went to high school a small town outside of a metro area, small white population and there were a handful of black kids but I don't remember any of then dating anyone white. They were popular, one was a cheerleader, one in football and basketball, one in track field events and wrestling, one was a scholar. I think the football player did take the cheerleader to a dance once and I don't think she liked him much. There was no snubbing with any of them and they weren't shy or acted like they were out of place but I would imagine they would have felt a minority just because. Honestly, I don't know what the reaction would have been if any since they were all well liked, maybe some raised eyebrows, I don't know but it's a guess. None were in my class, though.
Now, back then it was more break dancing and hip hop and ghetto rap didn't rise until late eighties and early nineties that was very influential to the black populace so basically back then we all dressed the same in regular or trendy clothing except for the "hoods".
But I don't know about other schools or those in the city.
I learned how to wrap working at a Hallmark store when I was in high school in the eighties.
No.
If the couple insists on having unprotected, unsafe sex, and the female is not on methods of birth control, then the male needs to pull out before ejaculation.
It is a medical fact there is no sperm present in pre-cum UNLESS the male does not urinate in between ejaculations. I would go so far to have the male also wash himself off in between ejaculations as well as urinate.
The female will not get pregnant.
But if you insist and can't resist on ejaculating inside then you better hope it's not the female's time of ovulation. I'd say you're a selfish jerk and you will have to take responsibility for your actions as in welcome to fatherhood.
My real life has supported this fact and I'm Fertile Myrtle.
There is NO sperm in pre-ejaculate. Now, if you don't want to wear a condom and prevent STDs you can still prevent a pregnancy. Or you can be a selfish a-hole.
I take it you never bothered to look it up. It is a medical fact.
No, what I said about the pull-out is really true about pre-ejaculate, look it up.
The only way it fails is if the guy had not urinated in-between ejaculations or doesn't pull out in time.
It's called the pull-out. Why don't they teach that in sex ed instead of pushing abortion? The only time pre-ejaculate contains sperm is if the man didn't urinate in between ejaculations.
Better yet, what about the risk of STDs and AIDS? Why such reckless intercourse anyway if you're having multiple partners? I thought the push for sex ed in public school was to teach safe sex also.
Maybe now some will think twice about consequences. The majority of abortions were from reckless sex and not rare circumstances like contraception failure, rape, incest, and "the life of the mother".
So, I am not only blaming the female but the male for being selfish for wanting to "cum inside" like an a-hole if he had no intention on being a father. Males need to be taught to know when it's time and not be an idiot.
Republicans don't listen to people like Frank Luntz, he is actually despised by many the same way Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney are despised.
Most of the people don't believe the hype about Jan 6 and do believe there was fraud involved and know their purpose for protesting it. The goal was not "insurrection" but to have Congress listen before they voted to look into the evidence presented first.
Regardless, I agree with Craig that I would choose DeSantis over President Trump, but my reason is because President Trump's cabinet picks and the traitors. I believe DeSantis would not allow or at least minimize any back stabbing in his cabinet.
On the other hand, I would hate to see Florida lose a strong leader. He is a good example to other weak Republican governors.
i don't understand his hair cut mid-80's, I didn't know of anyone with a bowl haircut.
Now in middle school before and Will in S1, he looked like one of my classmates back then with the same dutch boy or bowl hair cut.
Her cheeks look sunken and her head too big for her body in that picture.
In '84, the only house I knew that had a computer was the family next door and it seemed primitive.
In '87 at college, I remember one student had an Apple computer.
My future husband was into computers back then and was early on CompuServe.
I think my parents got a VCR sometime mid 80's and a video camera early 90's. Before that it was a film camera, no sound.
We didn't get our cell phones until late 2000, candy bar style, never had a flip.
I don't recall any bullying like that back in the 80's.
Also wanted to add, I don't remember tube socks still being worn in mid eighties, nor that style of gym short that they were wearing at the skating rink.
I liked this one back in the day.
One of my sons is built like Finn, tall and lanky, and he is built like his father, who was a tall string bean when we got married. My husband has gained some weight in his aging but it still doesn't make the shoulders broader and his bone structure is still the same. My son is constantly eating.
My other son is built like my side of the family, broader build, a little shorter, easier to gain weight.
Nancy does not look good at all. My husband's sisters were also stick thin and tall and in their aging is now starting to look better and having curves in putting on a few pounds. I don't know if Nancy is the same build but in some shots her head looks too large for her body.
The time I got the "asexual" vibes was when Will wanted to have an all boys D&D night with them and Lucas and Mike were missing their girlfriends and even explained to Will they had girlfriends, and Will was upset things had changed.
Except at the time I wasn't thinking "asexual" per se, it was more Will hadn't caught up in maturity with his two friends and wasn't interested in girls yet.
I didn't predict they were planning on taking it in the direction that Will was gay. You'd think they'd have given a hint to his feelings of that vs. still interested in boys' games and not into chasing girls yet.
When I was watching the movie, I realized that Sandra is from my generation and Ryan is from the next and how Sandra looks so good for her age in this movie, she doesn't look that much older than Ryan, she's aged that well. And I was glad to see she was still getting starring roles such as this, she is a very enjoyable actress to watch.
What's ridiculous is seeing actors like Jack Nicholson and Clint Eastwood paired with much younger actresses, they really do look too old.
Anna was made to be a hard read. Outside her overtures that seem to come out of nowhere in opposition to her personality, it's difficult to see her emotions and what she feels for William. I think she was made to be too guarded.
Her personality reminded me of Mrs. Robinson in The Graduate and although she slept with Benjamin, she totally acted blasé with him. We don't know if she felt anything for him at all, her emotions were unreadable and no chemistry with him.
It is said the movie was based on Uma Thurman and a friend of Richard Curtiss.