Sorry but it is the truth.
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMWUyMThjZjQtZGViNC00NzkwLWEzZjUtYTVjOGYzODgxMjNhXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyODk4OTc3MTY@._V1_FMjpg_UX1366_.jpg
Sure she has nice boobs and a good body but her face is not really attractive, it looks weird.
She kind of looks like Nancy Allen.
shareImo she has a cute face and a hot bod, so they're a little incongruous together, but I don't think that makes her ugly.
shareFace is fine, boobs are spectacular, you maybe gay...
shareNah, it's a butter face. You just have different (bad) taste.
sharebutter face requires her face to be ugly, her face is fine, not her best asset but perfectly fine. When you combine her titties into the equation, you have to be gay to notice any problems. They are so glorious and steal the whole show, why you even looking at her face at that point?!? Homo?!?
shareI'm an ass man, titties are not my domain.
shareI am a boob man but still appreciate a nice ass on a chick. I am a boob expert, I love big boobs, perky boobs, they don't even need to be substantial as long as they are natural I can enjoy them. And let me tell you this chick right here has some of the best boobs in the whole damn business
shareYes, I just watched the new movie “Immaculate.” The movie isn’t that bad, and her acting was good.
But I did notice that she isn’t as hot as I had heard
noticed the same
share100% Agree but she's nowhere near as bad as Emma Stone......
Emma stone looked like a newborn hamster face at the oscars AND in that weird ass movie.
In fact, Emma Stone pretty much looks like a female Gollum.
But Emma has the saving grace that she can actually act...
Eh Emma is not touted as this perfect beauty and sex symbol. Sydney is and she is far from it. Her only saving grace are her boobs which I guess is what blinds people from her being a butter face.
shareEmma Stone has something more attractive than Sydney Sweeney will ever have: great personality, great sense of humor and great acting abilities.
share