so, as with life as with Lifesavers candy, things are sweet but sour and and yet refreshing while being dark and sour while being everything and nothing it could be.
Sometimes, that cat is both alive and dead while at the same time I am fat, yet thin, thinking deeply about the nonesense of intelligence and ubiquiti of quantative personal reflection, I feel that feeling gives me the feels of feeling, yet lacking the sedimentarianism of the emptiness from taking a big dump wherein the existentialism of reality wholely fulfills the perceived emptiness of not existing.
Yet, with this, I think there must be gold in Nebraska, and perhaps a greater being controlling us all, like a giant crane machine in the night, dropping prizes down the chute of life, allowing some to become while others bego.
I stink, therefore, I am.
You are a fluke of the universe. You have no right to be here. And weather you can hear it or not, the universe is laughing behind your back.
Briefly speaking, as human beings, regardless of whether or not it is food, media, finances, money, jobs, relationships, friendships, social issues, religion, politics, sexuality, wars, hobbies and habbits etc, we all have a love/hate relationship with the world and life in general. Often even subconsciously and without realizing it. And could put for instance murder, physical torture, abuse of s*xual nature of any kind and variety in same and similar baskets, REGARDLESS of what OTHER social consequences for victims they may inevitably be laden with (yes, it is very sad and we know it, but don't we all wish it wasn't so frustratingly the case?), and could just as simply say in fictional scenarios discuss them as we can with killings and other forms of physical violence? Or is that IMPOSSIBLE in the world we live in today? And besides say them being different and unfortunate in a sense as they are, in online internet forum discussions, we will, sadly or not, frustratingly or not, or just in and of themselves, ALWAYS have people who will take such matters PERSONALLY, also put a lot of effort into looking at it all from victim's perspectives and what may be considered also an insult to them (but NOT say in cases of other physical acts of violence, wrong as they are though), and online, they will always cause controversies and anger and whatnot, as well as some deeply uncomfortable revelations about the generally selfish nature of society in general, films depicting cathartical revenge scenarios where villains suffer and die as a result notwithstanding and not being able to change the matter. Also, regardless of whether or not it is food, media, finances, money, jobs, relationships, friendships, social issues, religion, politics, sexuality, wars, hobbies and habbits etc, we all have a love/hate relationship with the world and life in general. Often even subconsciously and without realizing it. And could put for instance murder, physical torture, abuse of s*xual nature etc etc etc
Oh, I feel what you mean, brother!
It's like life is a series of fortunes and misfortunes mixed in with things of good natures and bad natures not withstanding changes of evolution of our thought process, processing processes to be processed in the process of processing.
Sometimes relevance supersceeds the unquestionable with the forthright contrivences of fortitude. Only to be brought back down by the howling of the soul's sister, hey sister, to exemplify meaning with disturbance of valor.
The servitude of our losslessness when questioning existance receeds like the ocean water on a beach of lies, tying up the bundle of gratitude with thoughts of being fully Klingon.
Intrigued by certain cinematic characters and in rarer unusual examples an IDEA - but NOT stating that in REAL LIFE I will be in any way indifferent or anything of that "nature" towards it not least due to law, and also morality AND how life works - I've been IMPLYING that on certain FILM discussions too so don't worry world. :) (Sorry I couldn't add a smiley here, not on phone.)
The complexity of the present time seems to demand a condensing of our lives if we are going to survive. Pain is the antithesis of power. You must take a stand against yearning. We exist as meridians. To navigate the path is to become one with it. Purpose is a constant. How should you navigate this intergalactic solar system? The universe is calling to you via supercharged waveforms. Can you hear it? If you have never experienced this source at the speed of light, it can be difficult to reflect. We can no longer afford to live with stagnation. You may be ruled by bondage without realizing it. Do not let it extinguish the birth of your mission. Throughout history, we have been interacting with the grid via four-dimensional superstructures. We are in the midst of an ethereal redefining of divinity that will become our stepping-stone to the galaxy itself. Our conversations with other adventurers have led to an ennobling of hyper-angelic consciousness. Soon there will be an unfolding of stardust the likes of which the quantum soup has never seen. After the totality has reached a tipping point, the future will be an authentic condensing of cosmic energy. We must unify ourselves and develop others.
But is 42 REALLY the answer?
I ask, knowing, because NOT knowing is only knowing but in reverse. The timeline of infinity is not a line but three dimentions - that we know of - like the pimple on my butt.
Sometimes, there is, but and yet sometimes there isn't. I think.
The appreciation of nothingness is a profound and paradoxical sentiment that invites a deeper understanding of existence itself. At first glance, the concept of "nothingness" seems void of value or meaning. It suggests an absence, a void, or a space where no form or thought resides. Yet, it is precisely within this emptiness that one can find clarity, peace, and a heightened sense of being. The very act of appreciating nothingness transcends the ordinary human desire for constant engagement, stimulation, or fulfillment and taps into a more meditative and introspective state of mind.
In many philosophical traditions, nothingness is seen not as a negative state but as a fertile ground for transformation and enlightenment. In Taoism, the concept of Wu Wei, or non-action, emphasizes the natural harmony that arises when we cease to interfere, when we allow things to be as they are. This requires embracing nothingness—letting go of control, of desire, of the need for constant motion. Similarly, in Zen Buddhism, the notion of "emptiness" (Sunyata) is not about void in the literal sense but about the ultimate freedom found in recognizing the transient nature of all things. Appreciating nothingness in this context is to find liberation in the absence of attachment, understanding that peace is often found not in what we cling to, but in what we release.
On a more practical level, the appreciation of nothingness encourages a kind of mindfulness that is increasingly rare in a world obsessed with productivity and progress. Modern society often equates value with doing, acquiring, or achieving. In contrast, embracing nothingness allows one to step back and realize that constant activity is not always necessary for fulfillment. It’s in the quiet moments—when the mind is not bombarded with tasks or distractions—that one can truly appreciate the richness of life’s simplicity. The beauty of a still moment, the calm of an empty room, the peace of a quiet mind—these are not empty in
Sounds like the kind of clever critique Søren Kierkegaard had for his fellow philosophers in his day. On another note, what you describe sounds similar to scientific principles observed by John Stewart Bell (the challenges of local realism; whether all things that can be touched or felt can be defined by shape and form).
But the REALITY of the symbiotic plathicism is refarked by unilateral mazeioc conflattery of emotional cofasnafism... as was done post the dark ages whilst tricognifying some zanderloufistic statuates. Agreed?
Thanks for the hearty chuckle; it reads like Daffy Duck and Sigmund Freud had a baby together.
There is nothing new under the sun.
In academia, fancy words are used in order to condense what's being talked about. Otherwise, the subject at hand will go on for many, many pages just to say the same thing. Simpler words tend to have fewer meanings behind them, especially if they come from a larger alphabet. Fancy words were never meant to obscure, and if they do, it's because of a language barrier. Isn't etymology wonderful?