MovieChat Forums > TheMan18
TheMan18 (13015)
Posts
Why aren't humans given enough credit for invention?
Reality doesn't ask for our opinion on anything.
Why can't our parents and/or relatives with us just relax and have fun?
Imaginary reality.
Did he deserve to die in your opinion, for his crimes?
In this world, are there too much rules on say rights in these departments?
How did he ALSO whilst in treatment find friends or even a friend who kept him company?
Lock, Stock & Two Smoking Barrels (1998).
How can I see his first "Mors in Tabula" film?
Anyone here seen this one - "Kings of Crime" or "Thieves in Law" (1988) Russian Soviet crime movie?
View all posts >
Replies
And who ultimately DECIDES which is which and which side is ULTIMATELY correct here?
But then why do so many people here, seemingly intelligent ones, actually state and argue that it is so, besides the fact that in both cases there is the removal of one's life?
But then why does this movie and many people speak against the death penalty even if the culprit was guilty, and how come in some cases (yes, I know they shouldn't do it anyways but still...) they may get life imprisonment and in others death penalty, and again, why do many people say it IS falling to their level and makes us monsters if it isn't so?
Although there are also debates if mistakes happen in such a system and it isn't perfect anyway.
P.S. The reason I DON'T murder others goes WAY beyond me wanting to avoid punishments of a legal variety INCLUDING in (some places and cases) death penalty as such. And others, well, including like shown here, they do it because (although many say disturbed individuals may not also think clearly INCLUDING legal consequences, also, he may or may not for instance have even known death penalty would come to him or even that it exists, internet for instance wasn't available in 1989 etc). Of course no excuses for it all, but you can see, capital punishment does come under fire even when guilty ones as such get executed, and people question if it really IS THE "right" thing to do, with many openly saying "its wrong" (even if you don't agree liscarat, just scroll through MANY of the comments here.)
"Empathy is our true salvation, not the sacraments."
Does it ALWAYS work though, and does it apply to say mass murderers? While it may be needed, does it really like that work in all cases though?
So in your opinion jameswball, even murderous evil psychopaths in general don't deserve to die and if we kill them, that alone in and of itself makes us as bad as them right, due to some kind of err universal principle even if it isn't always, for some or other reason, recognized even by what are meant to be professional legal establishments?
"100% wrong, 100% of the time"
Even if say someone being executed is a mass murderer or even say genocidal dictator? Even if life is taken in self defence, and what, like, all 100 percent, like that?
And if it really is as wrong as we say it is, why did the law still organize it? And would you say life imprisonment for someone like Poncelet would've been a more appropriate punishment?
"Lastly, this movie's message is neither for nor against the death penalty."
While we may see it this way in this movie, as an interesting slice of trivia, both the film's director Tim Robbins and actress Susan Sarandon in real life were and still are actually against the death penalty.
And the whole film sort of came across as action thriller meets attempts at social drama, imagine something like the later film "The Hunt" (2012) crossed over with "Lethal Weapon" (1987) or "The Last Boy Scout" (1991) (SPOILERS - they even went as far as to attempt to frame Denzel Washington's character of running a particularly horrid type of sexual offenders ring as well).
Did you like the movie, Fred?
I thought the kid was literally in the bad guy's hands and wasn't exactly wearing a seatbelt either.
View all replies >