MovieChat Forums > moviechatterer
avatar

moviechatterer (16293)


Posts


Do right wingers do anything that doesent directly benefit them? Detective in fallling Down The wild fires Just American schools? Trump - day one Trump asks Supreme Court to block New York hush money sentencing Great films of the last ten years 1 in 5 people in jail are American aerodynamics is the building pistons bit true? View all posts >


Replies


Wow you posted links! This is a breakthrough! Actual citing of sources . hats off to you! Now could you just say which bit (timecode) of which of those videos is actually relevant ? or is this some kind of data overload smokescreen with no actual meat in it? odd that the towers came with chessboards , given the single occupancy no contact rules ooh , its in a hymm forced on me at school , "high on calvary hill ... " haven't though of that for about 40 years odd what sticks in your memory Those are *very* specific numbers and age ranges , where did you get them ? The most the fact checker website I found could corroborate was: <i>There is a 2023 report by the social security inspector general which identified about 19 million people born in 1920 or earlier who didn't have any death data on file - 44,000 of whom were still receiving social security benefits. The report was triggered by calls to better maintain claimant records, after the Social Security Administration in 2021 estimated some 24,000 people received payments by the agency after death, amounting to almost $300m.</i> well , same reason Trump didnt do it on his last go-round, or any of the previous dem or gop leaders. Who could have imagined that incompetence of that scale was going on. I do remember seeing a video of some attempt at cost saving in the past , it was some senator other grilling a military guy about why a packet of about 5 bolts used in an F16 costs a zillion $ to replace. but you'd think general cost cutting a deadwood removal is a standard part of the job - not Trumps job but the people below him at the head of each federal dept. I dont think people object to Musk and DOGE doing that , they are just nervous he will mess it up up by over doing it. as an aside, remind me why he's called "Dictator Joe" again ? I bet thered be no objections and crying about which rights have been broken if the same thing happened at a muslims house for the identical reason - suspected radicalisation. I'm not going to bother watching previews of the soap i dont give a shit about , and then researching further on whatever far right twatter channel you follow , in order to help you make your inane incorrect point . The question is the same as every time the "persecuted white male" topic appears, which is daily on this site. "How do you equate letting black people onto the TV with : 'they are saying blacks are better than whites' " ? *sometimes this manifests as "They are taking over" "we are being hunted" "they hate white people" etc etc That is not a left or right issue . Democrats do not want fraudsters claiming checks "Who could oppose DOGE digging into this" ? well nobody , but should not need DOGE to dig into it. if true , that is boss level incompetence in the social security dept. Gone undetected by governments of both sides for decades presumably. What you have here is incompetence on such a monumental level that it is an embarrassment to America. If true. How do you take " portrayed as professionals in their field not maids or cook" and conclude they are saying " black people are better than whites." ? You sound like some 18thC slave owner beating a slave yelling "You think you equal to us?" “You should have never started it,” Trump said unbelievable! Thats the understanding of the situation from a guy charged with running the USA , which probably a more complicated subject than how the Ukraine war started. And then some par for the course kindergarten level drivel about "wernt invited" ??? which if was intelligible I'm guessing is some sort of back peddling excuse for why he hasnt yet "solved it with one phone call" as promised View all replies >