MovieChat Forums > LanceDance > Replies
LanceDance's Replies
Saying and believing that "it's ok to be white" isn't white supremacy. By that logic, "it's ok to be black" is black supremacy. Is that what you're saying?
The hand sign is the "ok" sign. It's a positive gesture that's been around since the fifth century BC, there's nothing supremacist about it. Next you'll be saying that giving a thumbs up, or even simply waving "hello" is white supremacist.
I was disappointed with how Ivo Shandor was handled in the movie. Even if you haven't played the game, his name was attached to the building in the first movie, and to the mines in this one. We finally see him in person movie-wise, and he's tossed aside right when you think he was gonna actually do something. They even got JK Simmons, when anyone could've played that role since it was completely wasted.
He's practically the reason there are ghosts wreaking havoc in the first place, and yet.... *sigh* At least we have the 2009 game. As much as I enjoyed Afterlife, both movie sequels (and the awful 2016 reboot) mostly retread the first movie. The game somewhat retreaded and had fan service too, but it then expanded on the lore and did its own thing. Hopefully, if Afterlife is good enough and they green-light a sequel, Ghostbusters 4 will try to do it's own thing too.
Amendments don't become obsolete just because technology improved. It doesn't matter how advanced the weapon is, that never factored into the second amendment. They made the 2nd so that people could defend themselves.
If the founding fathers saw the weapons we have today, they'd be even more solidified in their decision. All those weapons you mentioned? The government has access to all of them via the military. Times may change, but people still deserve the right to defend themselves from tyrannical governments, government thugs, and terrorists.
White nutjobs.
"yanks"? Are you British or something? If so, aren't you guys obsessed with Muslims? Fix your own problems before you talk about Americans.
Wow, you’re right. I could’ve sworn there were six villains in the film.
Vulture is kind of a good guy now, Venom too, so it can’t be them. Perhaps Scorpion will finally show up, or Rhino from the Amazing-verse will be brought in. Hell, maybe even that shadow guy with the hat, he hasn’t done anything yet. Or maybe Mysterio isn’t actually dead.
Agreed. Spider-Man: No Way Home might be up there, but I wouldn’t say it was THE most.
I’d add Avatar and Titanic to the list too.
Don’t forget Amazing Spider-Man 2 as well. But I guess the context is different this time, especially if they’re featuring the Sinister Six.
After seven previous Spider-Man movies spanning three different continuities, and the introduction of the multiverse, six villains is acceptable, this time.
After the success of Guardians of the Galaxy and Thor Ragnarok, I’m pretty sure “goofy” can sell as long as it’s good enough.
I like to call the torchers “target practice”.
Maybe not, but it's kinda fun seeing him dig his own grave, and he doesn't even realize it. I wonder how deep he'll go before he figures it out?
Your claim, your research, squirt. That fact that you're too scared to prove this "common knowledge" means you've been lying this whole time.
Owned.
People keep bringing it up because others keep bringing up this false notion that Rittenhouse is a Nazi who went to Kenosha to shoot people, all while also claiming that the people he shot at were innocent, or at the very least neglecting to mention their criminal background.
People are lying about who’s the good guy and who’s the bad guy, so other people are setting the record straight.
There’s no proof Rittenhouse was a bad person in any way, while there’s irrefutable proof the men who chased him and beat him were convicts.
Sure, it’s all irrelevant to what happened that night, but if people are gonna keep claiming Rittenhouse is a white supremacist Nazi (with no evidence), then others will bring up that the people he shot at in self-defense were criminals (with evidence).
Still insist on playing coy?
For something so easy, you seem to be having a hard time showing it to us.
“Common knowledge” eh? For something so damning and common, you’re the only one talking about it.
Use your google friend and prove it. Shouldn’t be that hard for you if he really said it.
The burden of proof is on you, buddy.
You made the claim, you need to cite your sources.
It’s actually gone over <i>your</i> head, buddy.
He wanted to help out, he was lent a gun for protection because those so-called “protesters” and “activists” always end up rioting, looting, and beating people up, in some cases even killing people.
There’s no law that prevents people from helping others out, quite the opposite, we have “Good Samaritan” laws.
So? The OP didn't say he was a cop, only that he wanted to be a cop. To anyone that's not left-leaning, that's an admirable thing.
Two lives, both of which were white convicts. The car dealership he went to protect was owned by POCs.
If anything, the rioters who destroyed the dealership in the first place were the racists.
What’s funny is that they keep calling Rittenhouse a white supremacist, as if that’s a crime, let alone the crime he’s being charged with.
Not only were the three guys he shot at <i>white</i> convicts, but the car dealership he went to protect was owned by <b>POCs.</b> He even posed with them in a group pic before everything went down. Not a lot of people are mentioning the latter point whenever “white supremacy” is brought up.