MovieChat Forums > SolarisPatchwork > Replies
SolarisPatchwork's Replies
Eight women that have no chemistry together, then when no one wants to watch it I'd call them sexist.
It would've been too hard to film him.
I remember everyone in the theater gasping, and there was a mumbling voice from the back of the theater saying "yeah, do it, Harrison. Faster, more intense."
Say what you will about the (massive) flaws of the movie, the visuals stood out, especially early in the movie. The heart plugs, the navigator, the hunter killer floaty needle thing, the insanely weird shields.
A military veteran is on trial for manslaughter in NYC for defending a woman against a deadly assault from a career criminal drug addict. He was aided two other passengers and over a dozen passengers has said he's a hero and may have saved their lives. So apparently the movie was just ahead of its time.
Accurate. Also a psychopath who tried to murder and sexually assault multiple people (https://moviechat.org/tt15398776/Oppenheimer/64bad54ea4b03806da33372f/Oppenheimer-tried-to-murder-his-professor).
He also was a self-aggrandizing narcissist who was clearly obsessed with his self image, and would do things like famously quote the Bhagavad Gita in front of journalists.
Also a failure of the movie: trying make me see someone who invented the fucking atomic bomb as a victim worthy of empathy because he had to face some abuse as he played political games. There's no reason to have anything but contempt for the people who created mankind's most immoral, indiscriminate, and inhumane weapon. If only Phalaris was the king who had ordered the construction of the nuke, and its creators could've been made to enjoy its effects.
Reg really felt like writing that was ahead of its time. He was a more everyman-like character, where the writers actually allowed some more contemporary humor to come in. Of course we've gone completely off the rails in this direction, in this Joss Whedon era.
They certainly whitewashed Oppenheimer, painting him in the best possible light when he tried to poison his advisor (and no, in real life he didn't go back to retrieve the apple), and omitting his other psychopathic behavior (which I talked about here: https://moviechat.org/tt15398776/Oppenheimer/64bad54ea4b03806da33372f/Oppenheimer-tried-to-murder-his-professor).
Modern casting for attractive female parts is clearly politically driven. It's like how there are ugly obese people on gigantic billboards advertising fitness products. It's an inversion and intentional demoralization. Weakens people so they consume more easily, and think what they're told to think.
>As you say, nutcases like this judge the value of something based on external things. Based on how it enhances their knowledge and understanding of "the lore" (stuff that happens).
Which is why I like the RLM TPM review. He points out that only what's actually IN the movies is relevant to judging the movie for the vast majority of people.
That's a pretty grim view of what makes a person attractive
That's pretty insulting to attractive female actresses
Destabilization to facilitate regaining control of the regime
Outrage on both sides is best for the algorithm. They had been trying to foment domestic unrest for a year prior to Floyd, but failed to do so. Breonna Taylor, Ahmed Arbery, Rayshard Brooks, Daniel Prude, etc. All didn't gain enough traction. Floyd could be argued about endlessly.
Dostoyevsky said: "the degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons." The same can be said of how its lowest criminals are judged.
Floyd was one of the lowest criminals. He was a drug-addicted violent felon who had previously impersonated a city official so he could break into a woman's house, then pointed a gun at her stomach and said he'd kill her and her unborn baby if she didn't give him her money. He only got 5 years for that and served only 4.
That being said, it was criminal to *continue* to restrain Floyd (using an approved technique, and no it wasn't on his neck, but that makes little difference) after there was no physical reason to restrain him. They had called an ambulance and were waiting for it to arrive, but after he became unconscious the police had a duty to perform basic medical aid, which involved rolling him into recovery position, checking his pulse, and performing CPR.
The other cops even suggested to Chauvin that they stop the restraint, but he continued. He didn't appear to care about the wellbeing of someone apparently undergoing a medical crisis in his custody. However, giving him 22.5 years for it is insanity. Floyd died from his own actions, including swallowing a lethal amount of Fentanyl to avoid additional drug charges. He had previously done the same thing in 2019 but survived after being taken to the hospital. There's only a small chance that the cops could've prevented it this time.
Biden didn't do any of that. He's just an empty vessel that occasionally gets angry for no reason, and occasionally reads words from a screen.
If it's her money it's her right to do what she wants with it. But obviously that's not responsible behavior, and if she's a mother and not providing for her kids, it's abusive and disgusting behavior.
Generally speaking, there are a great many people who don't have money because they're irresponsible, and have only their own behavior to blame (or don't want to change, and/or don't know any better). I know lots of people who make a pittance yet are responsible and smart with their money, who save it and slowly grow it, and don't need handouts.
All true, and I'm sure there are more egregious examples from the even more extremist leftist publications (if you can believe it). The MSM's mask is entirely off.
They also project constantly. They accuse the Right of everything they're guilty of in their hearts.
They're doing more and more dog whistling about "taking him out" too.
I think that explains why when the Omega is killed, it resets by more than one day, perhaps indicating the outer loop was initiated that day prior to the assault.