MovieChat Forums > SolarisPatchwork > Replies
SolarisPatchwork's Replies
They'll make that tech beyond illegal. For "trust and safety."
When you realize they're so bloodthirsty that they want to kill children, their actions make a lot more sense.
Rittenhouse's actions are not from a person who wanted to kill anyone. He fled for his life, twice. They chased him down and attacked him, four times. Once when the convicted child rapist charged him, once when dropkick man tried to kick him in the head as he was on the ground, once when skateboard communist swung a skateboard at his head, and another when the one-armed medic drew and pointed his illegally owned firearm at the child and had his bicep blown off in response. The child even lowered his firearm when the fake medic pretended to surrender (perfidy) and then raised it when the fake medic pointed his illegally owned firearm again. Only then did he fire to stop the threat. He was in the process of fleeing to the line of police. They wanted him dead. Bicep-medic even admitted in the hospital he regretted not murdering Rittenhouse when he had the chance.
The actions of his attackers are those of people who want to kill someone. The words of people like the OP are those from someone who want a child dead for the crime of standing up to their ideological cult of death and bloody hatred.
>For one thing, he is not a child.
He was a child when a child rapist tried to kill him, and then an illegal gun owning felon chased him down, and a communist man swung a skateboard at his head as he was on the ground, and another man tried to dropkick him in the face.
A child is a person who is under 18.
>I bet the sick duck
Who gave you a phone?
>Real men do things like joining the military or public safety.
Children aren't allowed to join the military or "join public safety," but he did improve public safety
>most like you fanboys, he lacks the skills to do so.
Most "fanboys" lack the skills to join the military or public safety? What?
Do you know what thread you're posting on? Do you know who Kyle Rittenhouse is?
Are you often confused by how forums work?
Nothing makes racist bullies angrier than when their victims stop being victims.
Very telling you identify with the bullies trying to murder a child, and you consider the skin color of the child important.
>euphoric atheist nonsense
You could say it's a scathing criticism of atheism. They killed their Gods (literally, even) and what did they replace them with? Hedonism, orgies, polyamory, liberal use of narcotics, pursuit of meaningless short-term pleasures, and ultimately complete destruction of their society. You could argue it was a one-off party to end all parties, and afterwards they'll regroup and come up with an actual plan to address their imminent deaths (when more Gods come back to cleanse the store), but that's not depicted or hinted at. Instead the larger existential question is ignored by all the characters. They threw off the shackles of their false and stifling religion but were unable to find anything to replace it with that would lead to a better, longer term stability.
Nietzschian foodstuffs would've argued that they had to become Gods themselves, and thus to meet that challenge they must live as Gods, but instead they were all transformed into the Last Man.
Same here. I thought I knew all about this movie based on reviews. Turns out it was actually far more clever than the trailers and buzz, and a genuinely funny comedy. At least in my view.
"Daddy Changed the World, but Couldn't Be Bothered to Stick Around to Raise You."
This summary is far more succinct and cuts to the heart of it, and justifies my decision to not keep watching the movie
The second he crossed the line I'd defend myself, then sue the school. A person like that would have a history of students he'd abused, probably even some who dropped out or worse. The school would be desperate to settle. Plus it'd be trivial to record him with a smartphone (even back then) and utterly destroy him.
The movie showed that a single tanker's worth of water was such a precious commodity that it was treated like gold. There clearly wasn't enough water to just be dumping it on the ground to evaporate. They were dumping a tanker's worth every minute or so. That'd be like telling all the poor people in a country they'd be rich now, then burning a palette of $1B in front of them.
>Also, he was keeping people prisioner, which de facto makes him worse, or are you in favor of slavery?
In the context of a post-apocalyptic humanity, I'm in favor of survival and freedom, in that order. The world of Mad Max made it clear that slavery was necessary for survival, which reflects what we know from history.
"B-b-but you're on drugs"
The modern version would have invented history for the sake of diversity. Much like "Hidden Figures" has done (to a great degree), or the intentional alt-history "For All Mankind," which has such egregious misrepresentations of the culture of NASA at the time that it's disgusting, and should be disgusting to anyone who has an actual interest in the real history of the US space program.
How do leftists deal with the observation that these trials all occurred right when he needed to go out to campaign? Or are they cool with abuse of the judicial system and lawfare?
Human behavior is very complicated. Sex is not
Gained nothing? The entire point was to redistribute wealth from present and future US citizens and put it into the pockets of the military industrial complex. They accomplished everything.
And which of his actions predate intervention from the CIA et al?
I thought he's taking the blame for Obama. Under Obama the intelligence apparatus staged a coup in Ukraine in 2014 that ousted their democratically elected leader who wanted good relations with Russia, and installed a leader who would: 1. install Democrat-connected cronies into political positions of influence, like on oil company boards; 2. arrange more US interference; and 3. pursue friendly relations with NATO and hostile relations with Russia.
The extended B-plot with two FBI agents was 100% unnecessary and probably included because Jason Statham was too white and male. They could've (and should've) cut that subplot out entirely, or down to just two scenes.
Statham's character was already motivated to pursue vengeance by his connection to his scamming/suicide victim friend, he was already operating outside the confines of the law, and he didn't need any assistance from the FBI. In fact, when I first watched it I figured those daughter would recognize the importance of extralegal interference, go rogue, and start feeding him intel behind her partner's back. That may have been her and/or her partner's arc, but instead he already had the means to get all that intel himself.
It feels like an older action movie screenplay with diversity glued on to satisfy the current requirements for getting a movie produced.
What is it you propose he could've done better? We see two alternatives in the movie, which I outlined above, and they're much, much worse.