MovieChat Forums > SolarisPatchwork > Replies
SolarisPatchwork's Replies
I have an easier time understanding why Donald Trump would deserve money vs. the extended family of George Floyd
>Also, Evangeline Lilly went from eye candy to looking older than Michelle Pfeiffer.
The wall spares no woman; old age gets us all eventually.
What a coincidence that just when Trump needs to spend his time, energy, money, resources, and political capital to campaign, he has numerous lawsuits all proceed against him.
When did she threaten to start?
He didn't think the cameras would cut back to him.
I think it's a real laser module from the time, but holy hell I've learned that that gun, a Jatimatic, is absolute garbage. Check out YouTube videos.
I'm actually talking about you at this point, not the Russians.
>Your biggest mistake is that you try to find common sense in anything that emori says. There isn't any. He doesn't operate like normal people.
Ooh, now I understand. Projection. Well, thanks for giving me the opportunity to so clearly explain this theory and evidence for it to the readers of this forum. There was never any chance of convincing someone as close-minded and bigoted as you.
"Fucked up something in their section" = "the Russians attempted to drill a hole 7 times, without a center punch, until they managed to get one through, in a completely irrelevant part of the ship, then patched it in a temporary manner without any residue or evidence, and when the problem manifested on orbit and the cameras to that section failed (at the same time the Serena Aunon-Chanellor had deep vein thrombosis and problems losing numerous items on spacewalks) it was because Russians are an inferior people"
Your theory is idiotic
The evidence is in the video whose title I pasted.
Wrong. "WATCH: Video footage from Georgia shows suitcases filled with ballots pulled from under a table AFTER supervisors told poll workers to leave room and 4 people stayed behind to keep counting votes"
Sad you're willing to speak with such spite and authority when you don't even know the basics. Haven't even seen the video I'm referring to, and with each reply you get more and more spiteful.
The video I'm referencing happened at the same time Biden attained the lead he needed in the county where the video was recorded. And it happened after the poll watchers left, and four women then stood up, took aforementioned boxes out from under covered tables, and began counting the contents, sometimes visibly feeding the same ballot through the counter multiple times.
It sure seems like people who built the world's most-used, most-reliable, and longest-running space delivery vehicle have more common sense than yourself, who fall apart at the slightest questioning.
That's my point. They waited for the poll watchers to leave, drew hidden boxes out from under covered tables, counted the contents (sometimes multiple times), and the time and place at which they did that corresponded to massive vote spikes for Biden from those counties.
Okay. Still doesn't change what I saw, and what anyone is capable of seeing if they're not blinded by ideology.
So the Russians attempted to drill a hole 7 times, without a center punch, until they managed to get one through, in a completely irrelevant part of the ship, then patched it in a temporary manner without any residue or evidence, and when the problem manifested on orbit and the cameras to that section failed (at the same time the Serena Aunon-Chanellor had deep vein thrombosis and problems losing numerous items on spacewalks), it was because the Russians have "no capacity for common sense" and their space program is dying?
Just because a module is named "Russian module" doesn't mean that everything that happens in it is Russian.
>Can't imagine if something will break down in American one and NASA will fun to tabloids to put a rumor that some crazy russian astronaut got into their section and broke down on purpose anything
They would if there was compelling evidence that that was the case.
She's popular because of her voice and talent?
Non-normal people with no capacity for common sense built the Soyuz?
What's the "I" stand for in ISS?
No, it's theoretically possible that it's me or "Trump himself." (Why is that your default condition?) But it's not plausible, nor is it probable.
What's plausible is someone/some persons who had direct physical contact with the affected spacecraft at the time of the incident, with the materials to cause the observed damage, and the means, motive, and opportunity (cameras allegedly stopped working) to do so, caused it.
It's also plausible, though much less so, that someone in the manufacturing process randomly banged a drill bit around without a center punch and caused seven attempted holes before drilling a random one, which served no purpose and wasn't supposed to be there, and then patched it in a temporary manner but without leaving any traces whatsoever of the patch.
It's also certain that both countries would push their particular interpretation of events to save face and establish a narrative. Short of something like an NTSB report (thank God we're permitted to see those for general transit incidents), we can't conclude for ourselves what surely happened. But we can easily examine what we know and draw conclusions from there.
And yet there's no plausible explanation as to why a worker would need to drill a hole there. It would serve no purpose. Even if you entertain the possibility that an aerospace worker wouldn't first use a center punch to center the hole so that it doesn't walk out SEVEN times. And then that their chain of inspection would permit a temporary patch on a hole that would come loose in space (with no evidence of the patch existing--no bonding, no residue, no patch itself, etc.).
All the alternative explanations I've heard are more outlandish than someone on the space station doing it themselves.