MovieChat Forums > TheAdlerian > Replies
TheAdlerian's Replies
Yes but when the stones come together the user is in charge of all reality.
So, the function of the glove makes no sense and is a plot hole designed to finish the story, for its own sake, which is a definition of a plot hole.
According to the logic of the glove, if you used it, felt it burning you, and thought "I want to use this thing, stop the burning" it would stop and your body would be strong enough to use it.
The comics handled the issue well and there was no need to have the glove impossible to use.
It is a giant plot hole to have an object that gives you control of reality and kills/harms you because that mean you do not have control of things.
So, it's a plot hole because the glove in the movie works against its own logic.
I think that's a great answer and will likely happen.
It failed in the comics and will fail big on screen.
I will not see a female/black/etc character movie like that.
It's still a plot hole as the gauntlet gives the person control over reality, so getting burned/killed wouldn't happen unless you wanted it to
There was no extreme damage as seen with other characters.
I covered that by saying it's depressing to kill fictional characters who are metaphors for unbeatable people.
These are not real people and the stories aren't remotely real. In addition, these characters are "brands" like Iron Man is a brand like a breakfast cereal is a brand. So, why destroy a brand?
The only thing I can think of is to plan for reboots of the characters.
That results in an accidental racist thing called "tokenism" and comics are famous for it.
It's where you insert a black, etc character into a story, just to have a black character in the story. That's a form of what's now called "virtue signaling".
It's crazy because it's an insult on so many levels. Now we have "black Thor" and he will be around for awhile then we go to white Thor again. So, the writers are saying "See we made Thor black, because black people!".
That's tokenism.
It's a huge insult to black people. Also, only having black and white characters is an insult to other races. The media is obsessed with black people for some bizarre reason and ignores everyone else.
Do you mean in the final battle?
It was stupid because these women didn't even know each other and there was a huge number of people there. So the filmmaker suddenly had the black women teaming up with alien women they didn't know existed. Somehow they all found each other instead of sticking with their teams.
It's obnoxious.
Yes. I was surprised.
I figured they were going to go with Captain Marvel being the most important character.
It's weird now that they made a Captain Marvel movie as she wasn't that important.
They should have made an Adam Warlock movie and stuck the source material.
Her acting wasn't the greatest either, but the material was total crap, so it's hard to judge.
Whatever the case, I'm amazed that people will spend millions to make movies that are just terrible and even the most average person would know it. I'd love an explanation.
The filmmakers and actors ought to be ashamed in this case.
Yes, but it doesn't make sense regarding rain, showering, and even drinking water.
It only makes sense that the volume of water is the issue.
The movie clearly shows that the aren't serial killers and their ability to touch people and see their sins is real.
You haven't watched the film.
Superhero stories are allegories, metaphors, etc for real life types of situations and people.
Dumb people see the surface story and don't like it because they don't understand what the characters mean to smarter people.
Did you watch the film?
The father is in touch with angels and becomes a monster hunter. This son follows in his footsteps and does the same while posing as a law officer.
One brother is really into it, Dean, the other isn't very much and is possessed by a demon.
That's exactly what happened on Supernatural.
You know what's crazy, I used to post a LOT on the IMDB forums.
I brought up many months before that Jensen would be great in a western and could do an Eastwood level character. It got a huge number of posts, then the "joke" episode came out!
I wondered if my thread inspired that episode!
Whatever the case, he would be great in a western if he played a Dean kinda character. He would also be great in a cop movie or a film noir thriller.
It's not great to be typecast but Dean is such a great character and Jensen brings it so excellently, it's like Dean is real. So, similar characters would be a path to success.
PLUS, I love Eastwood, but he was extremely wooden in movie after the westerners. Jensen is a much better actor at this point, so I wish him success.
If Jensen doesn't end up with a giant career, there's something wrong.
He reminds me of Clint Eastwood and could be in a LOT of really good movies.
The bizarre thing about the CW is that they don't promote their stars very much. You never hear gossip about them and so on, and I don't get it. Usually, actors pay for fake coverage and drama it tends to make females like them and gain a following.
This isn't BS either as there were movies made about that way back in the 40s.
Anyway, it means that the actors end up fading away. The guy from Vampire Diaries was AWESOME in the Ian Summerhold, or whatever, and where is he at? It's weird.
They are poorly thought out.
It's because Hollywood doesn't hire real writers.
We've had decades of dumb movies because of it.
If you watch movies from the 40s, where they hired real writers, you will see much better dialogue and ideas, yet that was nearly a 100 years ago. Hollywood hires all jewish relatives or producers and stuff for writers. They aren't talented and it sucks.
I hated Signs with a passion!
Lets land on a planet with giant oceans and rain clouds everywhere!
We will not develop protective clothing but go naked!
Suicidal aliens.
Also, they had no weapons. It was such a stupid movie, like anyone involved in production should have known.