MovieChat Forums > maixiu > Replies
maixiu's Replies
It's anti-white when it's enforced and mandated only in white societies. Are there DIE programs anywhere else in the world except European-settled nations? Why do you support such transparent, racially driven bigotry?
The list of people I've personally known that are dead/damaged because of the shots is staggering. The Wuhan flu was nowhere near as dangerous.
You still parrot that 97% claim? That's less credible than flat earthers.
Good move by the Japanese, but it's too little too late. The nation's citizens almost universally took the clot shot when they were rolled out and you can't unjab yourself. I know of at least 5 people in their 40's and 50's who have died suddenly in the past few months. One poor guy went right in a classroom at my wife's school, instantly dead. It seemed like these stories had been slowing down, but suddenly in my neck of the woods there's been a massive uptick in them. Anecdotal for sure, possibly coincidental, but the overall trends in excess mortality continue to be frighteningly high and there's really only one explanation. There's a good case to be made that the damage down by the mRNA shots is permanent.
Now if only the Japanese would similarly come to the realization that wearing your underwear on your face does nothing to stop the transmission of airborne colds and flus. They're smart people, but boy are they hive-like in their behavior.
She's a diversity hire, what do you expect?
So you're uncomfortable with rationalizing your anti-whiteness. You could at least be honest about it, admit it, and tell us why you feel justified in it, but you likely can't because it's a result of a lifetime of programming that you've glibly internalized without a second thought. And if tomorrow you got another firmware update via your television and computer, you'd alter your beliefs without stopping to think about what you're saying or thinking.
You really should quit at this point.
No, but in 2024 it means promoting anti-whiteness.
Having an identity that rests primarily on being Chinese (or Jewish, etc.) doesn't inherently mean you hold racist positions against outsiders, but it means you will give consideration to your fellow Han (Jews, etc.) over those who don't belong to your tribe. Yet this biologically evolved, purely human trait is culturally and legally denied to whites and whites only.
Willfully ignoring this, "they understand that in general Asians are not keen on miscegenation with <b>blacks</b> and so they studiously avoid portraying that in ads that are targeted to the Asian demographic." Lies by omission are still lies, my friend.
Also, why won't you explain to us why <i>you</i> think it's okay to treat whites differently than you would treat any other race or ethnicity?
Jon "Stewart" Liebowitz clearly supports the replacement of the "rule of law" with "rule by political power."
If you polled <i>huaqiao</i> (overseas Chinese, no matter the country), they would overwhelmingly tell you that their identity primarily rests in being Chinese, not in being a citizen of whatever country in which they reside. The same holds true for Jews, South Asians, Arabs, etc., etc. Only of Europeans is it demanded they abandon their traditions and ties.
<i>They added specific Asian cultural values into the ad to make them relatable.</i>.
I.e., they understand that in general Asians are not keen on miscegenation with blacks and so they studiously avoid portraying that in ads that are targeted to the Asian demographic. And this isn't limited to Hyundai. Asian-targeted ads in general adhere to this principle.
<i>Anyway, you're a racist.</i>.
Again, so what? I don't subscribe to your morality. If you accused me of not eating Halal or of neglecting to burn ghost money, I'd say that doesn't matter to me because I'm not a Mohammedan or a Buddhist-Taoist. The same holds true here. You belong to a fundamentalist sect that unquestioningly accepts anti-white precepts, and when you use that word you mean "you're a bad person, a heretic!" and nothing more. I don't belong to your religion because its ends are destructive to my people. So why don't you explain to us why <i>you</i> think it's okay to target one specific race?
I'm talking about your claim that I'm an anti-Asian bigot. You have no idea how stupid you are.
Yes, these would be ads for the Hyundai corporation. Like any other company, they go to an ad agency and say (in this case), "give me an advertisement for Chinese speakers who live in America." The ad agency whips it up and takes it back to the company who gives it the thumbs up or thumbs down. I know people that work in that business and they'll tell you that for ads focused on the population at large, they will <i>demand</i> lots of diversity, particularly blacks. But in these cases, Hyundai doesn't go back to the ad agency and say, "replace the Chinese husband with a black man, and then make sure that their kids have black friends!" Why? Because they are very sensitive to the cultural viewpoints of Chinese and don't want to offend them. Whitey, on the other hand, can go piss up a rope. As I said above, not only are blacks shoe-horned into every single advertisement -- in fact, if you watch a half hour of American television you'd think you were living in the Congo based on the ads -- but they're <i>always</i> depicted as being savvier and more successful than whites. Every. Single. Time.
Ha ha ha. You really have no idea what an ass you're making of yourself.
"Some of my best friends...."
If you don't watch ads I'm wondering why you're commenting on them. The Hyundai ads I referred to are the Hyundai ads I referred to. They're Chinese language ads that promote Hyundai products to Chinese-speaking Americans. How can I make this any clearer?
As for black supremacy, it's easily observable that in any ad featuring white men with blacks, the white men are portrayed as being stupid, inept, and subservient. I defy anyone to point to an advertisement in which the opposite is true. No corporate executive would dare green-light such an ad because he/she would risk being called a "racist", and they all agree that no worse sin exists.
Reading comprehension is obviously not your strength. To wit, "I'm talking domestic ads that are geared toward the overseas Asian community. For example, <b>Hyundai ads in Mandarin that are for the American market</b> or other, similar situations."
These are ads produced for and set in the Asian-American community. Every ad involving white people, what few remain on the airwaves, shoehorns race mixing and black supremacy into the message. Now why are advertisers so afraid to similarly offend their Asian customers?
Do you know a single Asian person in real life? Again, I lived in the Far East for years, much of it in Taiwan, and have traveled extensively in China. Chinese people are about as racist as they come regarding the subject of Africans. Which is their prerogative, of course. There's no blanket virtue in accepting and promoting other races over your own.
<b>Your racism is showing!</b> -- So what? That's <i>your</i> morality, not mine. Why do you insist on forcing your beliefs on everyone?
It's been standard practice for years among the environazis to tamper with the temperature data sets. It used to be confined to scummy climate "scientists" like Michael Mann, but now NOAA and NASA have gone whole hog. They cool the past and warm the present in order to create the illusion of a substantial rise in temperatures. Every single adjustment they make reinforces the narrative of political class. Never do they warm the past or adjust present readings lower. Why, it's the damndest thing! You'd almost think that actual science means nothing to them.
Tony Heller does yeoman's work in cataloging these deceptive practices and has a wealth of resources that demonstrate climate hysteria has been around for much longer than the current AGW nonsense. There's nothing new under the sun.
https://realclimatescience.com/#gsc.tab=0