MovieChat Forums > david80848688 > Replies
david80848688's Replies
In half of the series he's a zombie so he doesn't have to eat food or rest.
I'll be watching it later. Not expecting much.
As a kid I liked Fistful of Dollars, Dirty Harry and High Plains Drifter so one of those three probably.
Get ready for Saw XI -XX.
I always liked his combover. RIP to a great player.
4-6 continuing storyline reminded me of a TV show. The filmmakers probably regret not making it a TV series, since they could draw the story out even longer than ten films.
>How did they create a robot of her so fast?
Anicent druid magic.
I don't mind the cheesiness. I saw some of the old comic book covers from back then and they're as goofy or even sillier than this show.
It might be time to invest in a mutli-region blu-ray player.
The formula got played out over 5 films. They got serious again in part 7.
A lot of slashers have no (or very brief) nudity.
I didn't mind the lack of nudity. I watched it for the kills. If i want to see tits and ass, I'll watch something else. Do 80's slashers have much nudity aside from quick boob and ass shots anyway?
I haven't seen it yet, but my guess is it'll be generic and boring. Exorcist II, love it or hate it, was anything but generic.
Frank Zappa's debut album "Freak Out!" is a good double album that doesn't feel overlong and full of filler.
And V/H/S 1985. It'll be a busy month.
At least this time he did some more research for a remake and found something a bit more obscure (even though it'll suck).
I'll probably watch this, Saw X and The Nun II all on digital. Can't be bothered to go to the theater.
Stephen King's cameo is one of the few good things about it.
https://youtu.be/65GQg06SX90?si=H9SlY6LSpvWUnD7k
I swear I read somewhere it was one Stephen King's favorite adaptions. Cronenberg actually stuck to the story more closely unlike Kubrick.
Not only does this movie not suck, it's better than most of the Halloween sequels. How can you not like Tom Atkins, Dan O'Herlihy and John Carpenter's score?