MovieChat Forums > Stratego > Replies
Stratego's Replies
So what about "your comment says it all"? That seems like a personal attack.
Not sure why you felt the desire to chastise me while expressing that opinion, but alrighty-o.
And it also doesn't change the fact that this article isn't about any mistake by Trump. Here I'll give my opinion on Rowling and her mistakes.
Is this article about any mistakes made by Trump? No, so that says more than enough about you...
"Literary genius"??? Man, I can see you're a comedic genius!!!
An intelligent person wouldn't have made such a mistake in the first place. But honey, what's the point of responding to me? You really think I'm going to change my mind just because you say she's great? I think she's a despicable and dumb person. If you think it's so wonderful what she did, then just respond directly to the article. It's pointless telling me that. I prefer not to waste too much time on this woman.
Sure, if you think Harry Potter is great...Otherwise they show she's dumb, immature, pathetic, annoying and hypocritical.
But if she's all that you say she is, then no reason to apologize, right?
Yes, I think Harry Potter is real dumb. It's also a rip-off of other books and there's plenty to suggest she didn't write it herself. But that's beside the point. That you think her books are great says nothing about Rowling's intelligence, level of understanding or any other cognitive skills. Her tweets show that she's a dumb woman in many different ways.
Nonsense. The whole movie was exciting and entertaining. The audience I was with seemed to think the same thing. They were all buzzing during and after the surprising finale.
God, this woman is so dumb and annoying.
Even easier is to look at the number of posts behind the username. Archives show no such number.
I know, it was just an effort to get discussion going again.
I can definitely imagine Buscemi doing a much better and more memorable job, but I don't think he was that awful. Julia Sweeney as Raquel the junkyard chick was much worse. She didn't even come across as a professional actress.
"My beef was that the issue of Ortiz doing the damage playing hero was never brought up in the movie and they just went along like it wasn't really that big of a deal..."
So true! And he was a jerk with an attitude at that!
They absolutely would have. Especially a bomb expert like Harry would've expected some sort of booby trap.
No way you're going to read this, but they gave him money with a tracker and dye pack, so it was useless. They wanted him to pick up the money, so they could follow him and subsequently arrest him.
Well, I can say for myself that I'm a pretty skeptical person.
Personally, it makes me feel very satisfied. I know those stories are complete bullshit and I'm glad when there's evidence to prove it to those who did fall for them.
Also, mysteries are there to be solved! What's more satisfying than knowing the truth? Even if a mystery itself is interesting, I feel a sense of relief when they're solved.
I love it when stories like that are debunked. I always hated it when shows like Unsolved Mysteries took them seriously. I find it so interesting how Houdini used his experience as a magician to debunk psychics, I would love to see a show about that.
Who's Ann Frank? I do know an Anne Frank, but I doubt you're talking about her since her father was never murdered.