MovieChat Forums > Underdog_73 > Replies
Underdog_73's Replies
Don't forget bashing through the same brick wall over and over!
I said that I had to watch crap? Really? Read much? Try again. Clearly the only who's proven they don't know what they're talking about is you. Claiming I said I have no choice but to watch crap doesn't mean the same thing as saying I have no choice but to watch American shows. That's what they air in America. If you also want to debate that, I guess I could watch nothing, but that's not realistic. Give it up. You've embarrassed yourself enough. Arguing opinions is idiotic, and the lack of reading comprehension is sad.
What do you mean that's it? That's all there was initially.
What is this habit you have of debating something that wasn't said? Maybe it is suspicious. Maybe it's political. I don't know and I don't care. It doesn't factor in my opinion at all, and I made that clear. The guy came across as an unstable child. I don't care what happened to him. If he can't control his emotions he has no business being a Supreme Court judge.
Look, don't follow me around looking to have arguments that don't exist or debate statements that were never made. It's weird.
Dude, please explain how anything I said even remotely suggests I only watch broadcast TV and no streaming or paid cable. I don't think a more incorrect, baseless assumption has ever been made, dude. I named a few shows and you make this enormous leap as a result?
And dude, who said I "had to" watch anything. The entire point was I don't. Opinions differ, and that's great. But attempting to have a discussion by making up your own facts is ludicrous. It's like you read my post and started having your own conversation with some imaginary third person. Dude.
Nothing I said even remotely alludes to the fact I don't watch Netflix, Prime, Hulu, or paid cable shows. Preacher and Fargo, both great shows. The exception, not the rule. There are other decent shows, even on broadcast TV. Netflix also has a handful of good shows. As does Amazon Prime.
Baseless assumptions serve no purpose. If you're happy with the majority of shows, and don't see the idiocy I see, I envy you. There definitely are not too many good shows to watch. In any case, it's not a debate. You don't have to share my opinion, but don't make baseless claims.
Clearly you're their target audience then. Not a negative. I'm just the minority apparently. Personally I'm sick of childish humor and potty talk being at the forefront of everything nowadays. I lost count how many times I have to see a character taking a piss, or worse. Simply because it can be aired. It's like I'm watching stories thought up by grade schoolers. Every character is self centered and childish. Immaturity is something that doesn't appeal to me.
Granted, this show tackled "pissing", but it was done in a way that was funny. Not in a way told by a 3 year old. I watch many American shows. I don't have a choice. I have to accept what's being shown. Some are decent, some are acceptable. A few are even pretty good. But the overdone formula of the whiny, self centered, immature, confused, tortured outcast with some sort of addiction, has been done to death and seems to be the only character Hollywood knows.
Two of the worst new shows I watched this season are Magnum P.I. and A Million Little Things. The former being a tad more embarrassing. Happy Together might end up being worse than both.
Emotional control issues. Biased. That's it in a nutshell. Nothing else even needs to be discussed.
I'm not a leftist and it was clear to me he was crying like a toddler.
[quote]He must have totally looked like a liberal to you.[/quote]
And yet he's not. So what does your comment mean? One of your own embarrassed you, so you compare him to the other side? That strategy fails on so many levels it's almost as embarrassing as his testimony.
Just based on his "performance", taking nothing else into consideration, this guy doesn't deserve to be a judge, let alone appointed to the Supreme Court. He acted more like a crybaby, petulent toddler, than a grown man. It was the most disgraceful, and embarrassing, display I've seen in a long time.
That's like asking if lung cancer is a better cancer to get than pancreatic cancer.
No research necessary. Just an ounce of common sense and a dash of intellect. But you're right; not likely.
He had a lot of discussions on iMDb. Like many other actors, movies, etc, here, those discussions didn't transfer over.
Exactly. It's easy to say something is "spelled out" when you already know the ending. So the claim holds zero water. You were originally surprised by the twist, but now that you've seen it, it was spelled out. Do you hear yourself?
It was a cheap, pathetic, and unsuccessful attempt to bolster the Morgan character. The writing in this is god awful.
You mean you weren't surprised by something you already knew? How astonishing. Your post makes it clear you were surprised by the twist the first time you saw the movie. You're now complaining it's obvious, because you're now aware of it. Makes perfect sense.
Contrary to popular opinion? According to whom?
They meant fetish.
You're right. There has been a huge difference. Unfortunately not for the better. The professionalism and class are both gone.