MovieChat Forums > The Haunting of Hill House (2018) Discussion > Was it really necessary to recast the da...

Was it really necessary to recast the dad for current day?


Couldn't they have just done some makeup/prosthetic work to make Henry Thomas look older? Don't get me wrong Timothy Hutton looked enough like him i guess but i just didn't think it was necessary to recast an adult character for just 20 some years later, adults don't change THAT much look wise.

reply

Well, I thought the makeup looked totally ridiculous on Annabeth Gish and the actor playing her husband.

So in my opinion, they made a good call casting Timothy Hutton, especially since the younger him was an unknown.

reply

The younger him wasn't an unknown it was Henry Thomas, everyone knows him, he was the kid from ET and he'd been in alot of movies recently and even some netflix movies like Gerald's Game.

reply

I saw him in Better Things and had no idea who he was then either.

Don't remember anything from ET at this point.

Regardless, I see no issues with an older actor playing the older character.

reply

Agreed with both points. C, maybe B list actor is not known by everyone. I had never seen him before. I saw E.T. when I was a kid in the 90's, so I'm not gonna recognize the adult version of a kid from that movie. Given this and the Gerald's Game example, you could almost say people should know every actor who has been in a movie ever.
Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Ryan Reynolds, etc are actors where the term everyone knows them apply. Not Henry Thomas lol.

And I also had no issue with casting an older actor. I enjoyed current day Hughs acting a lot more anyway. The scene in the past where Mr. Dudley tells the story about his mother (which I thought he delivered perfectly), younger Hugh (Thomas) had such cringe worthy replies in that scene.

reply

If you want a good fun scare, watch Ouija: Origin of Evil. Henry Thomas is in it along with several other cast members of Hill House and it is written and directed by Mike Flanagan as well.

reply

Good movie! 👍

reply

They could've made Henry Thomas grey haired and grey-stubbled instead of putting these staring, unnatural-looking contact lenses into his eyes to make him look more like Timothy Hutton... they kept distracting me :/

reply

No idea what you are referring to. I didn't notice anything.

reply

Better for you, really. It's been annoying me throughout the whole series. (Almost) no one would have noticed he had darker eyes than Timothy.

reply

Yeah, those eyes were absolutely horrible. They seemed to be made of really thick material, so they even bulged a bit. Maybe that's because normal blue contacts provide little result when used on his natural eye color, which I think is hazel.

reply

I agree with the OP ...yes, you need adult actors for the children who have grown up, but not their parent, just gray his hair.

reply

One of the dumbest casting decisions ever made. Both are good actors, but they don't look anything alike and it was completely unnecessary.

reply

The series cut between 1992 and 2018 - 27 years later. They could have aged Henry Thomas up but I think recasting him was just fine. Timothy Hutton was really good as well. People are complaining about his contacts or whatever but I didn't notice anything and I doubt most people did.

reply

No lol alot noticed his eyes, look at this gif
https://64.media.tumblr.com/1295a34f5be052cd2c9bcc7d96f42567/tumblr_pk7g4kK2Mj1xjkfxpo3_400.gifv

He looks like a demon or something, those eyes are in no way natural.

reply

They look fine to me. This forum is actually the only place I've ever heard his eyes mentioned, so I think 'most' people really did not notice anything. Lol

reply

My thoughts too. lol

reply

I actually thought it was Henry Thomas but with some very convincing prosthetics and makeup, they really looked alike with the beaming blue eyes and small, high button noses. Only their jawlines looked clearly different but I put that down to a prosthetic jowl.

Great casting and both actors nailed it.

reply