Woke shite !!! - Bill & Ted Face the Music (2020) Discussion

[–] Zinger (2334) 4 years ago

Based on what?

reply

[–] TandyMan (11096) 4 years ago

2020

reply

[–] TheArgentinian (7061) 4 years ago

Based on his very fragile masculinity.

reply

[–] Tomiggo (186) 4 years ago

Ha ha, true!

reply

[–] actionkamen (23176) 4 years ago

But masculinity is toxic, so having a fragile masculinity is actually... desirable?

reply

[–] Tomiggo (186) 4 years ago

So he is woke?

reply

[–] TheArgentinian (7061) 4 years ago

Toxic masculinity is a byproduct of fragility.

reply

[–] Guitar King (4890) 4 years ago

And your toxic femininity is a byproduct of your Daddy issues.

reply

[–] TheArgentinian (7061) 4 years ago

*eyeroll*

reply

[–] [email protected] (2017) 4 years ago

You're the very reason the west is imploding. You guys will either be communists or the new middle east if you're lucky.

reply

[–] TheArgentinian (7061) 4 years ago

You're such a reactionary right wing cliché *yawn*

reply

[–] Ilyathe2nd (168) 4 years ago

I'd recommend you eat a bag of dicks, Guitar King, but I wouldn't want to cut your daily intake by half.

reply

[–] Guitar King (4890) 4 years ago

Ree! Ree! Ree! all the way home, little piggy.

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17405) 4 years ago

Tattoos, piercings, and heavy makeup are the biggest indicators.

reply

[–] Zinger (2334) 4 years ago

So men throughout history, warriors, fighters, soldiers, explorers, were expressing toxic masculinity?

reply

[–] TheArgentinian (7061) 4 years ago

Yes. What do all wars throughout history have in common? Who and why were they started? Have you never asked yourself this? C'mon, son. Think.

The world would be more peaceful if women were in power, don't you think?

reply

[–] Zinger (2334) 4 years ago

You'd be raped everyday, lad. That you'd be aggressively febrile in your accommodation is neither here nor there.

reply

[–] TheArgentinian (7061) 4 years ago

You're so stupid you don't realize you keep proving my point.

reply

[–] Zinger (2334) 4 years ago

And you're so intelligent that you took my solitary response and curiously manufactured a narrative that I apparently 'keep proving your point.'

reply

[–] TheArgentinian (7061) 4 years ago

No, it's not just your response that keeps proving my point. History and the present back you up.

reply

[–] Zinger (2334) 4 years ago

Yes, I am backed up.

reply

[–] asom (6824) 4 years ago

Women should fight this masculine fragility and take power for themselves.

Oh, wait ... they cannot :(

During the history has been proven that wars started by women are still wars. I guess they were just trying to prove themselves to their fragile male counterparts ...

reply

[–] sut6432 (2908) 4 years ago

You're so stupid you don't realize you keep proving my point.

The point that you blindly and completely generalize entire demographics of people?

The “there would be no wars if women were in charge” statement is one of the most idiotic I’ve ever heard.

Where I work, there are 2 or 3 wars started per week over something as insignificant as how one woman looks at another. 🤣

reply

[–] HAL9000 (935) 4 years ago

[deleted]

[–] DracTarashV2 (4493) 4 years ago

First let’s put aside the fact that this movie will have a VOD release and basically won’t have a real theatrical run, although you know this propagandist chud is aware of that (or probably isn’t because, you know, chud).

Awww.... wook at it. One of the many, man pro-exclusion super fragile reich wing maga chuds on this site crying about big bad wokeness like a true broken record manbaby reich winger. What a wittle brave badass! XD Woke? So the total opposite of the fascist white bro rage agenda you approve of (and is obvs propagated by that crooked bunker boy donny)? EXCELLENT! Standing on the GOOD side history instead of the REICH side? Fuck yeah!!! That’s what the characters of this series always represented, after all. They’re not the small dick energy proud boy type, they’re loving decent dudes. *gaps* Poor u and yer fellow triggered chuds.... ya will keep crying until your dying breath over films and media cuz this industry is thankfully never going back to appease reactionary maga behinds. LOL

reply

[–] macken74 (653) 4 years ago

Hook , line and sinker !

Yeah baby !!!

reply

[–] LeWildPlatypus (768) 4 years ago

I wonder, do you think the first two Bill & Ted films were 'reactionary' because of the slurs used in them? I don't think it's too much to ask to have a film not pander to sensitive people who think words are violence, now that doesn't mean appeal to the 'maga chuds' it just means a film shouldn't feel like an aggressive lecture but be something fun, which the first two films had in spades.

reply

[–] sut6432 (2908) 4 years ago

Wow...you need to get a life. 🤣

reply

[–] MinorityRules15 (963) 4 years ago

lol the movie has 2 white guys starring in it!! Way too woke, indeed.

Should've starred Kevin Hart and Hannibal Burress instead.

reply

[–] maximmm (3335) 4 years ago

We thought Picard was also going to be anti-woke but... it turns out he's old and feeble and has to be constantly saved by women.

I'm thinking this will go along the same lines :)

reply

[–] Jinx (3721) 4 years ago

Men can't be saved by women?

reply

[–] sslssg (34211) 4 years ago

No, any portrayal of a woman who can run, or do anything with strength is completely fabricated by the Hollywood machine. Oh, and it's even worse if the woman thinks.

reply

[–] maximmm (3335) 4 years ago

They can be - sure. But if every new film/series focuses on men being saved by super females - it stinks of agenda, no?

Furthermore, we've seen more than a fair share of films where women didn't even have super powers (not sci-fi) and yet could do things that only 0.01 percent of women are able to do and in a very different body frame at that - not the supermodel bodies hollywood adores.

reply

[–] Jinx (3721) 4 years ago

Do you think that MEN can do the things fighting wise that you see in every film series? What is the ‘agenda‘ with women being able to fight?

reply

[–] maximmm (3335) 4 years ago

Well - Commando might have gone overboard a bit, even if Arnold looks like a tank ^^

reply

[–] Jinx (3721) 4 years ago

Okay?

reply

[–] MinaVladimir (4081) 4 years ago

Just like real life then.

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Actually, the daughters were just female bill and ted. They were written so blandly that they could have been played by 10 year old boys and been just as important to the plot. They didn't really represent anything political or offensive.

I was hoping for more character from them. Samara Weaving is an awesome actress.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 4 years ago

VOMIT.

reply

[–] bnm123 (0) 4 years ago

[deleted]

[–] darkpast (8716) 4 years ago

I was shocked Ted was trans now

reply

[–] JoWilli (19957) 3 years ago

Ted?

reply

[–] LeWildPlatypus (768) 4 years ago

Found this in the FAQs over at 'that website who closed the message boards'

on why the writers retconned the sons as daughters

We tried to make them into cool guys. That was stupid. And then when we finally had the idea a few years later, 'Wait, why are we beating our heads against the wall with this? What if they had daughters? What if it's Billie and Thea?' It just opened it up completely. So that's much better idea. And it helped us with something we were trying and to do anyway with the movie, which is -- the first two movies, they are male centric. They were written by boys who knew no better. And so this also gave us a chance to go, 'Let's just widen it, man. Let's like, let there be more of a female presence and just make it more inclusive'.''

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1086064/faq?ref_=tt_faq_1#fq0104372

This could've been good...oh well at least Twitter won't cancel you.

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

yea!!! More Inclusive!! Yea... oh wait, it sucked though..... hmmmm.....

reply

[–] Drooch (5333) 4 years ago

Cringe!

reply

[–] cyguration (3951) 4 years ago

'Let's just widen it, man. Let's like, let there be more of a female presence and just make it more inclusive'.''

Anyone who uses the word "inclusive" to write fiction is either a retard, a crack addict, a pedophile, or a Biden supporter.

reply