Out of all the MAGA posters here, tvfan is the only one that seems unentertaining and uninteresting. Why is that? I feel like they are the type of person who would say that people needs to be literally disposed of to make a better world.
shareToo much TV?
shareNo, they are just good friends.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVTsZQOBbsU
What did he say that's psychotic? I don't memorize people here, so I don't know what he said.
shareHe's the one responsible for 90% of the psychotic crazy tinfoil hat shit you've read here ( out side of the usual "it was rigged" maga headlines and casual right wing racism)
"20 million have died from the covid vaccine" was one his claims a couple weeks ago.
"Energy weapons brought down the 9/11 Towers" is another classic.
He's also the one who will dismiss anything not fitting his fantasy dreamland version of reality as "MSM lies - wake up sheeple!"
TVfan is one of the more meticulous posters on here. Be cautious ⚠️.
Tvfan might start calling you "baby reindeer".
Tvfan's posts hardly reflect that of an individual who's psychotic just because you don't agree with he or she's support of Trump. I mean, I feel people who vote for a Communist in Camela Harris are psychotic
shareIt’s good that you concede that pro MAGA folk are interesting and entertaining, but I disagree with your take on tvfan - watching him eviscerate regime lackeys and wokists like Skavau is very entertaining 🍻
shareyeah , he really showed them didnt he !
With his constant cries of "wherever you heard that its MSM lies "
and incontrovertible arguments like "the evidence is online"
What chance do those questioning his truths have?
If that was any kind of accurate representation of his rhetoric then you might have a point. It isn’t, of course, you just pulled that characterisation out of your lying ass because he humiliated you too 🤣
shareTVFan characterises any source provided by anyone on anything to him that he disputes as inherent lies. Or just asserts 'false flag' with zero supporting evidence.
shareWow, if you hadn’t nuked all of your credibility with relentless dishonest sophistry and lies in service of an evil regime then maybe someone might believe your drivel. You fucked up and now nobody takes you seriously.
The lies that you still can't identify. The "regime" that you still can't identify (that if I recall apparently included the Polish Foreign Minister at one point). The only way you would ever "take me seriously" is I became a Trump fanboy and agreed with you on everything. That's it. You accept zero disagreement to your worldview. Anyone who does not agree with you on anything is an enemy to you.
And TVfan does this to everyone, not just me. Although when he (rarely) provides any supporting evidence for himself, for claims he's making, suddenly whatever he's providing becomes true and not "internet scripture". His reading of sources is incredibly selective.
🥱
shareCan I ask, and this is relevant, do you deny the holocaust?
shareApologise for being an evil sack of shit who relentlessly deploys dishonest sophistry in the service of an evil regime and I’ll consider answering your question.
shareIt's relevant because TVfan does deny the holocaust. Just so you know who you're defending here.
What "evil regime"? Describe the sophistry please. And you can go fuck yourself, I'm not bound by your hatred of anyone who disagrees with you, and your presumption that anyone who does so does so because they're dishonest, or hateful, rather than just honestly holding positions contrary to what you think. I'm not an arrogant hateful and narcissistic piece of shit like you who believes the entire world revolves around them.
If that was any kind of accurate
Are you blind? that is 1000% accurate.
TVFAN does this in virtually every post and has never "humiliated" anybody
Its like the blind leading the blind around here.
If you cant see from the black and white evidence in front of you on moviechat pages that TVfan has never provided proof of anything and always dismisses anything anyone else says as "MSM lies" then its no wonder y'all believe 2020 election was rigged and other pure bullshit.
And how does he eviscerate me? He's amongst the most stupid posters here.
shareSalty loser ain’t ya?
shareHe could say anything to me, and you'd say he won and that I lost. TVFan could literally just go "no u" to everything I say, and like a lackey to a dictator, you'd still congratulate him on his strength of character and wise responses. TVfan just makes outlandish and often absurd claims and refuses to back them up. It's just what he does.
share🥱
shareSkavy is the worst of them all, i heard his keyboard has a special key that types the word "evidence"
shareHaha! Yep, there’s nothing he loves more than wasting people’s time by asking them for ‘evidence’ of the patently obvious.
I’ve encountered bots with more personality than that NPC fuckwad.
He’s definitely the worst, if Moviechat was Shawshank Prison, he’d certainly be Bogs: https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/66bff21be2b59409e700e862/If-Moviechat-was-Shawshank-prison?reply=67150f48614709526ce1e7b6&animate=false
>Haha! Yep, there’s nothing he loves more than wasting people’s time by asking them for ‘evidence’ of the patently obvious.
It's "obvious" that the holocaust was a hoax? It's "obvious" that the hurricane was caused deliberately by the Democrats?
Just a few of the claims that TVfan makes.
Fuck off snitch
share
if moviechat was a prison, skavy would be in showers trying to peek at some johnsons.
Back to the "haha ur gay" attack, are you?
shareit's not really an attack, if you're a such a self loathing homosexual and have hate towards your fellow woofters that you think saying a gay person is gay, then i suggest that you are indeed slef-hating.
shareIt's clearly meant by you as a pejorative, especially as you characterise being gay purely by stereotypes about how gay people behave.
Also, I'm not gay - as I've said repeatedly.
why does everyone say you're gay?
shareThey don't. But those that do on here are about as childish as you and use it as a pejorative. It fits with their childish mentality that "anyone who is a liberal/progressive/leftist must be gay." It's really no deeper than that.
shareeveryone here says it and you know that. and various people have also made the accusation that you like young boys, any comment?
share>everyone here says it and you know that
No, they don't. And those that do also say it about other people who they characterise as their enemies. Melton has a megathread where he lists all of his political enemies as some imagined homosexual bloc.
> and various people have also made the accusation that you like young boys, any comment?
I've commented on this repeatedly. It's blatant lies, and if you continue to go down this road I will report you to the moderators.
Call me gay, whatever, start insinuating that I am a rapist or child molester, and it stops being funny. Multiple people who have done that ended up getting their accounts deleted, or banned.
"nobody has called me gay or a pedophile, but i've had to report multiple people for saying it, and ive got them banned"
ok...
I didn't "have to". I chose to. Do you think it's acceptable to hurl baseless accusations like that against people?
Think what you like about my political views, but how does hurling accusations like that somehow prove I'm wrong? how does that make you look clever and right?
so nobody has called you a gaylord or accused you of being a pedophile, but you've reported people for doing it, if they dont do it, how can you report them?
shareI didn't say no-one has - I said people had done so maliciously and on zero grounds. Most of them are now banned or deleted their accounts.
share[–] Skavau (15507) 6 minutes ago
>everyone here says it and you know that
No, they don't.
well you can't get me banned, so i have no problem with saying i believe you're homosexual and theres the likely hood you went to a kindergarten and took pictures of the kids.
the report button is at the bottom.
I have reported it.
>well you can't get me banned, so i have no problem with saying i believe you're homosexual and theres the likely hood you went to a kindergarten and took pictures of the kids.
And on what basis do you claim this?
Why can't I "get you banned"? Presumably if you repeatedly violate the sites rules you will, like anyone, end up banned.
Do you think it makes your arguments against me stronger when you hurl baseless accusations against me?
shareyou can't get me banned, i own this website. you report people when they say you're gay because it's true.
paul the admin told me he's sick of your bullshit and he wishes you'd just go sow up your ass and be lonely you queen.
>you can't get me banned, i own this website. you report people when they say you're gay because it's true.
You do not own this website. Also, I don't report people for calling me gay.
>paul the admin told me he's sick of your bullshit and he wishes you'd just go sow up your ass and be lonely you queen.
Here's my suspicion. You're clearly the (third?) incarnation of an account that each time they have returned has made following me around on the site their primary objective. That is to say that their devote their online persona to simply harassing me. I suspect you've already been banned twice.
Also, you've already had a few posts where you call me a rapist deleted.
You're now back to behaving like a petulant little kid. It's truly sad that you're likely an adult and behaving like this.
i haven't been banned once pal, so here we go, you make claims, wheres your evidence?
shareI said suspicion: not evidence. I obviously can't prove you were those older accounts, but you have the same behavioural tendencies. In either case "NewYorkJoe" is clearly not your first account. You came here with knowledge of the place.
sharewheres your evidence you sicko?
shareI didn't claim I did have evidence. It's a suspicion. You understand the difference, right?
Also, how am I a "sicko"?
strange, when people here have an opinion you bark "evidence!!" at them. one rules for them, another for the cum queen right?
typical little gay boy
>strange, when people here have an opinion you bark "evidence!!" at them. one rules for them, another for the cum queen right?
They don't present it as an opinion. They present it as fact. I respond to opinions differently than I do claims presented as fact. If someone was to admit to me that they don't have evidence, then that would be fair enough.
Do you honestly not get the difference?
i said "clearly britiain is becoming an islamic state"
my opinion, you demanded "evidence" in 5 posts
so you can have an opinion, but i can't?
typical little entitled fag, that thinks just because he's gay the world has to bow down to him.
>i said "clearly britiain is becoming an islamic state"
>my opinion, you demanded "evidence" in 5 posts
That's not quite the train of events. You made claims about police not arresting muslims (or others) in the UK for supporting hamas. I found a number of examples where this is simply not true.
You never acknowledged those examples. I also gave you an example of the high court ruling against muslim students in a school.
you're a sicko
shareSo you have no argument are just back to baseless insults.
If my arguments are so bad, if I'm so poor at this, why can't you stick to the points?
you have the opinion that i've been banned, i ask for evidence, you say "it doesn't work like that"
i say that england is become islamic and that the police support hamas
you say i must have evidence..
its one rule for me, another for you. but i get the left wing narrative that being gay makes you a victim of everything and so therefore the same rules dont apply.
well done victim boy,
>you have the opinion that i've been banned, i ask for evidence, you say "it doesn't work like that"
Sure, it is an opinion. You're a new account who clearly came here with knowledge about this community. I think you've been here before. You also have the same behavioural tendencies of some former users who followed me around on here and who (possibly) got banned, and deleted their account. Or just deleted their account.
>i say that england is become islamic and that the police support hamas
This is a specific claim though. It's reasonable enough to ask for some examples of this.
Your "police supports hamas" constitutes one police officer who was fired and then arrested for supporting hamas. If a US policeman supports the KKK, does that mean the entire US police force support the KKK?
>its one rule for me, another for you. but i get the left wing narrative that being gay makes you a victim of everything and so therefore the same rules dont apply.
Again: I'm not gay. If I was holding to that narrative that you claim exists, wouldn't I have to claim to be gay? Which I'm not doing.
Your grasp on logic is poor.
you think i've been banned, i ask you for evidence, you say "i don't need any"
yet i think you're gay and you demand evidence...
it's your logic thats off, special victim homo boy doesn't want to play by his own rules.
>you think i've been banned, i ask you for evidence, you say "i don't need any"
I didn't say "I don't need any". I did not present it as a fact. I said it was a suspicion. I can't know who you are, but I do notice behavioural patterns.
>yet i think you're gay and you demand evidence...
How would you even go about proving this? Do you know me? I know nothing about you, so I don't make claims about your private life.
i've said you're gay, you've asked for evidence, i've saaid i BELIEVE that the police support islam, you ask for evidence. youu BELIEVE i've been banned, you dont need evidence... you're a victim.
share>i've said you're gay, you've asked for evidence,
I've asked really on what grounds. I've explained why I think you've been banned, or at least have been here before. What's your reasoning for me being gay?
>i've saaid i BELIEVE that the police support islam
That's really not how you at all framed it initially. And even if it's a "belief" there are many arrests that contradict this.
special victim gay boy wants different rules...
i think something, you want evidence, you think something, no evidence neeed...
speial victim boy wants special victim rules!
>special victim gay boy wants different rules...
i think something, you want evidence, you think something, no evidence neeed...
I didn't ask you for evidence here. I asked you for your reasoning. I provided my reasoning for why I think you've been here before.
What's your reasoning for accusing me of being gay?
you are famous on this site for asking for evidence and source anytime that someone dares to have an OPINION you don't like,
but you're too fucking stupid to play by your own rules, you can think something, and have no prrof, but others can't.
thats why you're hated and laughed at.
then your next move when you can't win is to report people.
you're standing up to anyone, you're not fighting here, you're being a fucking idiot who people despise. even leftists.
>you are famous on this site for asking for evidence and source anytime that someone dares to have an OPINION you don't like,
Correct. And no, it's not based on an opinion but based on claims about reality. Something that is falsifiable.
>but you're too fucking stupid to play by your own rules, you can think something, and have no prrof, but others can't.
I didn't claim I had evidence for you being an older member of this site, and possibly banned. I make inferences based on your familiarity, and behaviour on here - and draw comparisons. This is my reasoning.
What is your reasoning for accusing me of being gay?
>then your next move when you can't win is to report people.
No. I only report people for inciting violence, making threats or making very nasty allegations (which being gay is not one of).
>you're standing up to anyone, you're not fighting here, you're being a fucking idiot who people despise. even leftists.
You can always just put me on ignore, you know. Or stop replying to me.
I'm not forcing you to reply to me.
Also, you didn't answer my question: Do you think it makes your arguments against me stronger when you hurl baseless accusations against me?
shareSuperbly handled NewYorkJoe 👏🏻
This thread is a masterclass in how to handle Skavau…
How did NewYorkJoe "superbly" handle me exactly? What were some of his best arguments?
shareHe treated you with the level of disdain and mockery that you deserve.
shareBut what actual points and arguments did he make?
shareNobody owes you anything other than disdain and mockery because you’re an evil sack of shit who deploys relentless dishonest sophistry in service an evil regime, remember..?
shareI'm not bound by your allegations.
I'll take this as a concession that you can't provide a single point in what he said, just that he hurls abuse. Is abuse and insults substitute for an actual argument?
You’re not listening. Nobody owes you anything other than disdain and mockery because you’re an evil sack of shit who deploys relentless dishonest sophistry in service an evil regime.
You forfeited your right to equal treatment, remember..?
I didn't say you "owed" me anything. But I'll still reply to you when you continue to dedicate your life to harassing me. And what "regime" is this?
And again: I am not bound by your allegations.
You asked how NewYorkJoe ‘superbly handled’ you. You have your answer.
You don’t like the answer so you’re kicking and screaming, but you have it.
Now, keep kicking and screaming with yet more Hatchling questions, show everyone what pathological denial looks like…👇🏻
>You asked how NewYorkJoe ‘superbly handled’ you. You have your answer.
What makes it "superb"? Do you think if I just shouted abuse at you I would be "superbly" handling you?
Skavau AKA Mr. EvidencePlease is a Brit and doesn't even participate in US elections.
shareEveryone knows this. I don't hide where I am from.
shareSource?
shareIf this is meant to satirise me, it doesn't even make any sense. Source for what? That I'm from the UK?
shareCall-out threads are lame. Do better.
shareOf course not, tvfan is proof.
shareI’ll take your word. I don’t even know who tvfan is or why the OP has beef with them, but creating pile-on threads is a weak move. Have the balls to confront those you disagree with head-on but don’t try building a posse, it makes you look like a pussy.
shareI had the same reaction reading this. I also laughed at posse-pussy in the same sentence.
shareI’m glad someone noticed 😆
It seems the fan of television isn’t as kind about me sticking up for him as you’ve been. I think it’s maybe had the opposite effect, he’s going in hard after I said some disparaging words about Mr Trump. Oh well, some people just can’t be pleased.
I still hate call-out threads and stand by my words.
He has the amazing power to find Fake News and believe it no matter how stupid and absurd it is. Only MAGAts are so gifted!
shareWatch it, your butthurtness is rearing it's ugly head over one man of all people in Donald Trump and it's only going to get worse for you in 2 weeks when he becomes your New Daddy
share