MovieChat Forums > Skavau
Skavau (15993)
Posts
Acolyte Cancelled
Futsal should replace Football in the Olympics
High Quality Lesser Watched TV series
Admiral Shokar is portrayed by trans actress and youtuber Abigail Thorn
Black Metal
In this forum: People whining about a reimagining (or just title take) of a show they were never going to watch anyway
This is your reminder that there does exist other TV series outside of Star Wars and the MCU
Why didn't Jason2... [Spoilers]
What is with the adult obsession with the MCU?
Rate the song from 1-10 (Blackgaze)
View all posts >
Replies
I feel like I've seen "Biden about to start WW3" every month on here for the last year or so.
He's got less than 24 hours to do it.
>But muh fact checker said it's not true.
Going to actually address its arguments and sources?
>That fact checker confirms 100% that it is true, otherwise there wouldn't be a fact checker for it.
What the actual fuck is this brainrot logic? "Your rejection of my claims means it is true"
https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/california-reproductive-health-bill-does-not-legalize-infanticide-idUSL1N37Z2H5/
"BILL DOES NOT DECRIMINALIZE INFANTICIDE
Law professors on reproductive health consulted by Reuters said the bill does not decriminalize infanticide and the amendment sought to limit misinterpretation of its language.
“This language in no way protects someone who kills a 28-day-old baby,” Cary Franklin, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles School of Law (here), said.
“It protects people whose fetuses die in utero and people who take actions or fail to take actions while pregnant that may result in death shortly after delivery.”
“The bill states that California will not use its law enforcement and judicial resources to prosecute pregnant women and other pregnant people for the outcomes of their pregnancies,” Franklin said, whether miscarriage, stillbirth, abortion, or perinatal death due to causes in utero.
Two cases of women in California being charged for murder after experiencing stillbirths prior to the bill were covered by the Los Angeles Times (here), (here).
Mary Ziegler, a Martin Luther King Jr. Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law (here) said that when it was first introduced, “there was some concern that that language was vague and it could be interpreted to immunize pregnant people or women from criminal penalties during the perinatal period.”
The California Catholic Conference, for example, initially described the proposed legislation as an “infanticide bill” (here) but after the clarifications made in the amendments said it would “remain neutral on the bill” (here)."
Explain away the argument from here please.
>Did you forget about the 200+ Republicans that recently endorsed Scamala?
Can I see this number? And out of how many Republicans is this?
>Democrats don’t need to endorse other Democrats that are already in disguise posing as Republicans which is why it’s the other way around (fake Republicans endorsing Democrats).
Democrats don't endorse Republicans in the first place. What the hell are you on about? My point was that Democrats typically endorse Democrats. Most Republican politicians even if they don't like Trump are also endorsing Trump. There's some never-trumpers, but most of them are just not endorsing Trump as opposed to endorsing the Democrats.
No.
I'll go and post wherever I like.
You demonstrate again how you have zero interest in any kind of debate here. Jussie Smollett vibes. This is just a cutesy tik-tok kid that contains kids of a relatively wide age-range. It's weak as hell.
That's not what I asked you.
View all replies >