MovieChat Forums > jimmyjuliano12 > Replies
jimmyjuliano12's Replies
if these homo-sapians were in fact homo-sapians, is that why they're extinct?
they won't ignore it, but they won't complain about it
please don't encourage someones obvious mental health issues, i beg of you.
you'd have to come to the conclusion that they were shot him because he was black. but yeah, it just shows how little black lives matter to black people.
but the whole suits thing and that sort of "legendary" stuff came from the advice he got in the coffee shop. years later. when his girlfriend left him he changed.
I'd have to say more than likely they'd be a mixture of republicans and democrats, young, living in NY and at times very idealistic.
But i don't think that marshall or ted would be so progressive, at times marshall took jobs that paid well and didn't care too much about his idealism, ted had a very traditional way of seeing the world, he believed in the concept of the nuclear family, he wanted to get married, he wanted kids, he even bought a house for the future, wanting all this, lily and marshall were also like that. this isn't generally how the progressive left sees the world.
Barney would have liked trump, this corporate way, robin too, with her guns her no nonsense attitude.
They weren't woke, they weren't progessive, i mean take the most liberal person on the show, whoever that may be, could you imagine them complaining about pronouns and wanting genderless bathrooms? (well barney would have liked that)
They all had well paying jobs (i'm not saying that democrats all work at white castle), people with money tend to understand the economy, they know socialism doesn't work and don't want high taxes, they for the most part believed strongly in traditional values, like the family and none of them was politically correct. so it's safe to say they weren't the progressive type, but not exactly hardcore republicans either.
i'm glad he didn't get it. radnor is perfect, the fact he was an unknown before mixed with his acting makes it so much more believable. and remember that alyson hannigan is also in himym, it would have seemed some strange american pie reunion.
In the case of jackie jr, i think he believed that being the son of a boss and the kinda step son of ralphie, a captain.....would allow him be given a pass. that things would get straighted out and everything would be ok. i mean thats what ralphie initially wanted.
In real life i'm pretty certain that someone like jackie jnr would have got a pass. tony really pushes for ralphie to kill him, using that reverse psychology. i think it was revenge for what he did to meadow.
his plan was going to the housing project, and hoping that a few days later someone would reach out to him somehow...
I've seen the trailer and it looks very "netflixy"
wait, so i'm using "ad hominems" but instead of addressing what i've said about jackson, you ignore it and find it easier to say i'm a sock?! do you not see the irony?! this is exactly why you seem over emotional and lacking reality.
i think my comment went over your head
well ok, but then we'd have to assume that the average joe (no pun intended) was capable of arriving at sane conclusions, right? we live in a world where a man with a wig on is a woman and if you don't agree you should be in jail. believe me i stopped caring what the majority thought was true to be a long time ago.
remakes just show how bad modern society is, every decade has had it's own identity, the last 10 years will just be known as the "remake era" lets get the frasier cast back together, how about ET? maybe stand by me with black kids? how about ghostbusters with women? oh wait they already did that right?
it would be very naive to believe that a third world war would be fought with troops on the ground
I don't see arguments, just emotions, just the defense of the indefensable. you've got so radical that if someone doesn't think like you, then it can't be the opinion of more than one person, because you couldn't be wrong? it would have to be the same person right?
insane
https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2016/06/21/items-discovered-police-michael-jackson/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBI_files_on_Michael_Jackson
When have i argued? just because i don't agree with you? because i have another opinion?
They found 1000s of searches for "kids in oprhanges" with 100s of photos being downloaded. Police believed these were used "to get himself off"
your complete failure to trying and discuss something without geting all emotional and offended says a lot. and this was always the problem, reasonable debate was always torn down with emotions.
I'm pretty sure that these doctors were paid off to protect his legacy, thats why even though micheal was an addict, his personal doctor has the blame pinned on him. his sister latoya said he didn't have it, qunicy jones said "micheal told me he didn't have it"