MovieChat Forums > acidraindrop > Replies
acidraindrop's Replies
People conveniently ignore this reality.
Not a fan of Stanley Kubrick?
Nah, it was pretty convincing as far as fast movies go. Movie dealt with it head-on a few times why Mia would travel to them, and why Brian would have stayed home.
Uh, they spoke in normal English when they were in Ohio.
There's no reason for them to do so afterwards.
Yeah, what the other guy said. It's not an anti-man wokefest, unless someone concludes that the fact that entire widow program is based on the abduction of young girls as being inherently too woke.
Everything stems naturally from the narrative, and if there's anything unnatural, it's what the other guy said, it's just like, a "chick action movie" in that sense.
<blockquote>No real female villains.</blockquote>
Literally claiming this just after Fast 9 came out.
OP is acting like celebrities don't have multiple marriages.
You're not really following this conversation properly.
<blockquote>He's practically protagonist 1a and gets more screen time than ANY Avengers movie. Fights Thor, the Big Bad Wolf, and Surtur.</blockquote>
I was referring to the final climatic fight at the end of the film. He got a few key freeze frames, but the film didn't really take the time to show him actually fight, which was disappointed. The final scene in Ragnarok was disappointing as a whole, but I felt that was specifically odd.
<blockquote>Hulk entertains children. No one else.</blockquote>
The two hulk movies didn't have much of a following, although the cartoon show did. It seems Hulk is more effective with children, so Marvel doesn't give a shit about him.
This is it., This is the primary issue with the movie imo. As a long-standing zach snyder fan, the lack of payoff is the issue, and it's very noticeable in this movie.
Also, keep in mind, that we didn't even get to see Hulk shine in that fight in Ragnarok.
Hulk entertains children. No one else. So Marvel doesn't give a shit about him.
The fact that he got not a single cool scene in Endgame's final fight outside the snap, is proof enough of his being ignored.
A good parent would also tell me not to do a fraction of the things I've done in my life, like getting a tattoo. This is a stupid question.
Agreed, but it does conflict with my original claim of his kicking him out of town being inappropriate (legally).
Ofc, it's still hella unkind. At least drive him to the diner. I'm usually the type of a person that's more inclined to respect cops, but I totally get rambo coming back over the bridge like that.
This is the correct answer.
Like David Bowie.
I totally forgot that vagrancy was a crime in some areas lol.
Holy crap, multiple ppl didn't realize that he was basically letting Kimble go in that scene. He wasn't shooting to kill.
Dude, you completely misread that scene you weirdo.
I loved Down Under, but I didn't think anyone actually felt like the sequel was better than the first film.
Maybe this is like TMNT, where it's easy to just think Secret of the Ooze is better at a glance cause it's funnier and more exciting, but the original is just leagues ahead, a better movie.
I also didn't think anything of the alleged animation issues in Rescuers. I mean, growing up, I just dismissed it as being older, but I still thought it was an incredible film.
lmao @ the fact that they didn't even try to come up with something.
lmao well said. This is like, not even a smoking gun.
I'm sure he did drugs, just like I'm sure Bob Ross looked at porn. Like, who gives a fuck.