MovieChat Forums > CodyXBrenda > Replies
CodyXBrenda's Replies
What, did you daddy touch you in the naughty spot or something? Go to fucking Hell you son of a bitch!
Wow, you're a pathetic piece of shit! Go fuck yourself! Also, don't forget to put a gun in your mouth and pull the trigger because nobody wants to deal with a lowlife shithead asshole dickhead loser like you!
This website keeps getting worse because it's filled with toxic shitheads who do noting but BITCH, BITCH, BITCH!! Enjoying being toxic shitheads, people?! You only have yourselves to blame!
No, every Halloween movie made after 4 is worse than every Scream movie made after 4. I get that H20 and 2018 are decently made, but the rest of the movies suck and I'll take Scream 5 and 6 over the majority of almost every Halloween film made since the 5th one. Halloween 5, 6, Resurrection, and Ends are all worse than Scream 3, 4 5, and 6 combined. The writing for Scream 3-6 is a least clever whereas almost every sequel after Halloween II has pretty bad writing and completely ruined the character of Michael.
I played it and remember being so disappointed because I really enjoyed the first 3 games made by Insomniac.
Its a shame because Spyro: Enter The Dragonfly also suffered the same fate as Sonic '06 and that was a console generation earlier. The original Spyro the Dragon trilogy on PS1 was great. Having played through the Reignited Trilogy, the games still play fine but some of the cutscenes don't have the same charm to them, as they did on the PS1. Apparently, ETD was rushed and it only has 1 hub world and 8 worlds when it was meant to have like 25 worlds and more than 1 hub world, similar to the first 3 games.
It was so hyped from what I remember. Then the game released and people were like "Wow, this game is such a glitchy mess!".
No, it wasn't. The 1993 live-action movie was a soulless cashgrab. The movie was a terrible Mario movie, but a decent sci-fi flick. The 2023 one wasn't that bad and people just love to whine about being "entitled brats" when things don't go exactly their way and this website is a perfect example to exploit whiny moviegoers' own egos! This current generation loves to make an ass out of itself and embarrass themselves. Think God I grew up in the 90s before all of this social media garbage ruined us all.
If the OP hates Sonic Adventure 2, I dare him to play Sonic '06! A game full of glitches, a bad story, and long 2 minute loading screens! Also, Silver was a piece of shit character and unlike Shadow, never appeared in another mainline game, ever again. I have a feeling the OP only made this shitpost, just to whine about how he sucks balls at the game.
It seems that Alex did cause the apocalyptic future because he said he was the inescapable results of him. It bugs me because how would he think that unless Alex trying to alter the past by failing to save Emma somehow cause the apocalyptic lunar cataclysm to occur in 2037.
The only takeaway would be that Philby's teachings eventually lead to what happened in 2037, way back in 1899-1903 when he asked Alex if we would go "too far". That's far more believable than a single person's tragedy and them failing to stop it leading to the entirety of mankind suffering an apocalyptic event, some 100+ years later. How does that even work?
No, the Über-Morlock wasn't going to kill him. He told him to get in his time machine and "go" back to his own time (circa 1903) since he didn't find him a threat and even politely answered his question, but since Alex was pissed about the Über-Morlock controlling his entire caste by commanding them to kidnap and eat the Eloi, he retaliated by fighting the leader while traving to the far future and eventually kills him by pushing him outside the temporal bubble and rapidly aging him until he dies. He then arrives in the very far off future (the year had 9 digits, BTW), which is far worse than 802,701; so Alex went back, saved Mara, then set the machine to self destruct and wiped out all the morlocks, so he could free the Eloi and rebuild civilization.
This film wasn't that bad. It is definitely not a masterpiece, but it's not awful, either. The movie is fine and does have some really good ideas but some of them are not executed well; like if he can't save Emma, can he not stop the lunar apocalypse that doomed mankind back in 2037? Stuff like that is never explained. The Morlock leader said he couldn't save Emma because his time machine was the reason why he built it in the first place and had he actually succeeded in saving her life, then he never built it and therefore his motivation never existed and we're presented with some kind of grandfather style paradox. Now if he couldn't save Emma, then I doubt he could stop the moon cataclysm from dividing mankind and knocking it back to to the stone age. However, the movie never explains that and we're just assuming he cannot save Emma. Stuff like that sadly ruins it from becoming a really good movie, thus we're left with just an average time travel flick with sum of its parts. The movie is pretty good, up until it becomes boring and the mundame stuff like him speaking to Mara and the other Eloi only works in the 1960 one because average movie audiences back then liked the more laid back and melancholy narrative in movies. In 2002, that no longer works and this was at a time when spy movies (which also originated in the 1960s) and superhero movies were more on par with what average moviegoers wanted. The approach in the 60s is what Baby Boomers in their child and teen years wanted, not Gen Z people coming of age, in the 90s and 2000s.
For context, I've seen both the 1960 and 2002 versions and the 1960 is a lot better because it wasn't trying to be like 3 genres in 1 movie. Also, the two apocalyptic events in both movies that lead to the devide in mankind are completely different and were not even in the original 1895 novel. In the 60s one: The near future year is 1966, instead of 2037 and instead of a moon cataclysm, it's nuclear war (WW3) and a volcanic eruption that dooms mankind and splits it into two races. The 1966 scenario was way scarier than the 2037 and not to mention FAR more realistic. When I saw the moon crashing scene from the 2002 one, it made me think of The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask where Link had to stop the moon from crashing in 3 days, also via time travel. The 1960 one is actually terrifying and there's a plethora of disasters that happen: buildings and houses catch on fire from the nuclear missles launched from the satellites and the ground becomes covered in lava from a volcanic eruption. In the remake, it's only earthquakes, due to the moon being ripped apart from Earth's gravitational pole. I also like the ending from the 1960 verison better. That's not to say the 2002 one was terrible. He couldn't go back to 1903 for two reasons: the time machine was destoryed to wipe out all the Morlocks (along with their lair) and there was no reason to return to his own time and get some books (which is what the time traveler did in the 1960 verison) because of the hologram, Vox. While I find the 2002 version decent, the 1960 one is a lot better, because it was closer to the novel.
No way, Halloween Ends sucked worse than both Scream 5 and 6! At least Scream 5 and 6 were watchable, if messy. I didn't need to watch some "cashgrab" finale about a whiny emo 24 year old who acts like a 16 year old getting bullied by some high school band geeks who dress like jocks and eventually becoming a pawn of Michael Myers.
I know that, but this series barring the name "Friday The 13th" while having nothing to do with Jason reminds me of how Halloween III had nothing to do with Michael Myers.
You people are not movie lovers and no, the hate is not fucking well deserved. Only pathetic trolls would say that! This crybaby generation is full of entitled brats and yes, that is a goddamn fact!
The 1990 miniseries needs more hate, not the 2017 one. The 1990 one sucks and only nostalgiatard hipsters like it. God, Moviechat is a horrible website! No one on here is a good person. Sorry to say it, but its the truth. You're all toxic people who want to be entitled to your own options and whine if they don't agree with you. You're all sad plebs!
You're also all a bunch of anti-Trump libtards who want America to continue down the dark path it's on, instead of having a brighter future. How pathetic!
Fucking garbage humans like you don't deserve to live!
I hope Satan has fun with you, when you go to Hell!
I heard the ward is looking for you. They told me someone matching your description escaped last night.
Like you people are no different.
No, you people need to stop with the "I'm only gonna focus on negative shit, instead of the positives" crap because honestly it's getting old real fast!
Christ, this gen is a lost cause because you're all a bunch of whiners who need your damn bottles! Heaven forbid we fucking focus on the positive shit. More people need to call you jerks out for complaining about EVERYTHING!
Oh, and before you accuse me of being an opinion Nazi, it wouldn't be a problem and if people actually focused more on the positives, but nobody can even do that anymore and just nitpick and bitch, regardless of how big the issues are.