MovieChat Forums > PeppermintHippo > Replies
PeppermintHippo's Replies
Men are more easily impressed by the looks of women than the other way around. Most women don’t even care about looks, they want money and security and a sense of humor or good personality.
Men go bald, tend to be heavier, and don’t dress as well as women so I’m not sure how you could think men look better on average. But all I’m saying is that women rely more on “magic” (makeup/cleavage/tight clothing) and this illusion does work for a while, can come crashing to the ground like a house of cards if they’re not careful.
All posts on this site are worded to get reactions, duh that’s the point of conversation.
Some women age very poorly, this is a fact. Nothing sexist about that. But it’s okay to make an observation that women can more easily fall in the looks department than men do. Also if someone wants to be shallow then let them be shallow, who are you to decide for others the rules that women should be judged upon?
No I agree that there are more better looking women, but their looks go downhill more drastically and at a faster rate then men do. Most men hover around a 5 and might drop to a 4 later on while most women hover around 6 or 7 but might drop down to a 2 out of nowhere.
Yeah 6 months is more rare, but it’s just crazy how fast a woman’s looks can go downhill whereas men don’t have this same drastic dip. I agree that outfits and attitude can play a big factor and boost the sex appeal, it’s just scary how you see these hot chicks on Facebook but when you meet them in person it’s obvious that the pictures were two years old and they now look fatter and uglier.
Whoa, didn’t mean to rustle you jimmies there chief. Just an observation I’ve made.
Frisking young black men in high crime areas isn’t “mistreating” them, it’s called cracking down on crime. When Baltimore stopped doing this the homicide rate nearly doubled.
Typical Liberal taking my words out of context.
Only 1% of gun deaths result from mass shootings. Most gun deaths are gang related and happen in the inner city. The fact that you blame the NRA and nothing else is very telling.
The real culprit would be the Democratic politicians who make laws that benefit criminals and make it difficult for cops to do there jobs. The easiest way to cut gun crime in half is to allow cops to frisk young African American men in the inner city, this group of the population is responsible for a majority of the homocides in this country but the Liberals desk this as racist.
I agree that guns are too easy to acquire but it’s mostly because of Liberals not cracking down on crime and viewing criminals as victims. Yes the NRA deserves some blame but it’s mostly democratic blunders.
Liberals are taught the opposite of thinking for themselves and conservative thought is pretty much banned on college campuses. This is why these entitled leftists try to ban free speech whenever a conservative speaker gets invited to speak on campus.
With a name like Sammy Jackson you’re either one of those angry black men who got brainwashed in your early adulthood or you’re a white progressive nut job with poor taste in movies. I wonder which one hmmmmm.
America is engrained in a culture of violence, that’s why gun control doesn’t work in cities like Chicago. You can’t compare the US to other countries.
If Liberals would come out and denounce progressives I would cut them way more slack, but they refuse to and it’s disgusting. Anyone who supports a progressive agenda is no better than the people who support the racist Alt Right.
Then how do you explain the gun violence in Chicago.....ya know the city with the strictest gun control in the country? Do you even know how many black people kill other blacks every year?
It’s not common sense when you continually underestimate criminals at every turn. Some mass shooters plan for over year before they carry out an attack, if they are determined there is no stopping them unless someone else with a gun does. No amount of legislation will help but I’m all for giving the whiny left what they want so they can be proven wrong and more people will leave them and start voting Conservative.
The media didn’t have to point it out, they of course can’t help themselves because in 2018 we’re still talking about skin color 24/7.
You’re concerned about hateful bile coming from Red States, but not concerned about the Middle East that is constantly planning worldwide terrorist attacks? Words are more dangerous than suicide bombers and hijackers? Hmmmm that’s interesting.
The media has to inject race into everything, that’s why I avoid it if I can.
You offer no evidence that your ideas would even help, you just assume they would. Yes it will take probably 5 years for all the necessary legislation to make it harder for the younger mass shooters. Only recently have the shooters been at or below 18, it’s usually carried out by men in there mid to late 20’s.
I keep bringing up other venues because those on the left have an attitude that armed guards are pointless so I’m asking why we can’t just get rid of them at banks and concerts to highlight their stupidity.
You’re also very naive with thinking that passing legislation will stop people from getting guns or slow it down enough to really make a difference. There are so many guns stock piled everywhere in this country, Liberals have always been a criminals best friend in that they assume that laws alone will be enough to stop them.
I didn’t say we should nuke them now, I said that in 30 years we would probably be forced to if things continue the way they’re going. Only a fool would allow suicide bombers and planes flying into buildings for so long before taking proper action.
Just because I have aggressive foreign policy beliefs doesn’t make me to the neoconservative right of them. That isn’t how the political spectrum works. I’m not religious, I don’t hold the constitution as the holy bible, and I’m for small forms of gun control.