MovieChat Forums > IMDBrefugee > Replies
IMDBrefugee's Replies
Cameron Diaz in The Mask
It's become sort of a identifier based solely on the titular character. Examples already mentioned of this are "Freddy" and "Jason" when referring to their respective franchises.
Another example that used to annoy me was when people referred to "Family Matters" as "The Urkel Show" or just "Urkel". It began to make sense given that he for most people he 'became' the show just as Jason, Freddy and Chucky 'became the movies they were in.
He's a wrestling commentator, historian and youtube personality.
You could make that argument. Which is why movies that have an over emphasis on it generally don't do well - Violence, profanity, Nudity. Obviously there are exceptions or they may develop a cult status but it's probably not going to be received well and thus not worth it, nor is it again even necessary.
I don't understand your second point - ' a film scene where a child would be naked in real life'. Like if they're changing their clothes? Why show that?
It's very different to have <insert very attractive actor/actress in nude scene> where the reaction be whoa <said actor/actress> looked good. vs. <insert child actor/actress in a nude scene> and the reaction is most people scratching there head.
Lastly I think a parent would have an issue with their adolescent child being nude for something that is again not necessary to get the point across to viewers, yes they're naked.
First Spawn was PG-13, but it was supposed to be R and was toned down. Blade and Sin City were R. The Watchmen was R as was Kick-Ass. Deadpool was just the most successful R movie.
It's alright when it's here and there, but when it's blatant like constantly showing scenes of a Mac book being used for example with it's illuminated apple symbol, it's a bit much. It's like, ok we get it. It's a Mac Book, you want us to buy one.
I don't think it's necessary.
I've never been all that big into it. I like to use Facebook to see how people are doing from like 10 years ago, but other than that I hardly use it. I still don't really understand Twitter or Instagram really, unless it's a business.
I give many sequel movies the benefit of the doubt, but this unquestionably stands on it's own no problem.
My guess is Dad's who need a little something for the kids that's all in one. Action with some laughs.
π₯π₯π₯
I got the impression that they both more or less stopped practicing diligently. Johnny perhaps after KK 1 or 2 and Daniel after 3.
Then there is just how much of what you learn just kind of "sticks", so even though it's been several years you never forget the fundamentals. Johnny just mixes that with being "badass" and wha-la. Daniel probably practiced alongside Same about 5 or so years prior so he's maybe slightly less rusty.
The last thing I assume is that they get practice in off screen. I know most of the time Johnny is slacking when he's got free time, but we do see him trying to get back into shape in some montages and Daniel moreso doing meditation.
Totally agree. Also it removes having to make excuses during suspenseful scenes such as the phone battery being conveniently low or there being no service. The ol' land line suddenly ringing scaring the character also becomes a thing again π
MEW
It's a waste watching movies like this on regular TV. That is unless of course you're purposely seeking the edits and censored words for laughs.
Why even have a child in the first place? Yes it's wrong. Especially if one is deceiving their partner about it.
These are the best to me. Poltergeist comes to mind.
The more butter the better!
They really emphasize it I think the Director cut. Also Rasta dude was funny, I always thought him being part of Stansfields thugs was funny.
Nice catches!