MovieChat Forums > hackerman6731 > Replies
hackerman6731's Replies
It's bad, but it's a fun bad.
I did, I was 14 years old, I've seen it dozens of times since.
Agreed, and same.
Same.
I've never found her that attractive tbh, she always looks like she smells like patchouli oil.
I wouldn't kick her out of bed for eating crackers.
Jodie Foster is still gorgeous.
I actually like the poster, the colors look cool.
Oh, geez, dozens of times.
How messed up is it that Alzanden seemed to be okay with them killing him...
Kino is releasing a blu ray soon.
https://www.kinolorber.com/product/gotcha-blu-ray
You think 35mm is inferior to DVD or Blu Ray? Well.....you're wrong.
I don't think you understand how catagories work.
I think they're referring to what she changed into later, it was okay, tight black pants, and a weird jacket that was like tight black material on the bottom, but was like a brown satin jacket thing with a leopard collar. Definitely not something you'd change into to not be noticed.
Just a guess, probably not really in her control, maybe health problems.
It was so awful, that Ving Rhames gave his Emmy to Jack Lemmon.......
No idea what movie you watched, but IMO the 97 version was excellent.
Of course it's a classic, BUT IMO (and I'm not the only one) this was better made, the acting was as good, if not better. The bits that were updated to modernize things was good. It didn't have those awkward shots like the original where they cut to a single of an actor out of nowhere (ie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqDd06GW76o&t ). They did a lot of handheld camerawork in the "remake", which gave the scenes a little more life.
Agreed, I generally don't care either, but I didnt expect it from a Terminator movie.
He was the best part of the movie.
I remember hearing her on Marc Maron's WTF podcast, and she was drier than a piece if toast.