MovieChat Forums > DracTarashV2 > Replies
DracTarashV2's Replies
“you should see me in a crown”
No symbolism here - it’s just that particular fetish Tarantino has on full display, if you will. Sure, while hippies walking around barefoot and having dirty feet is/was based on reality, you can always expect Tarantino to find any excuse to get actresses in his movies to show their feet (good ol’ creepy uncle Quentin!). This wouldn’t be a Tarantino film otherwise.
Pretty good film btw. And no, it’s not ‘cause of the silly ass regressive reasons the social injustice reactionary manbabies that whine every day and hour about modern Hollywood (the way the industry is not regressively-correct for their con assess) approved of it. Heh, projecting snowflake reactionaries just can’t with the fact that this industry is no longer appeasing their true PC asses like it did for decades, and is instead moving forward. But that’s what this film is, huh? It’s set in a time when the status quo was beginning to be threatened by non-straight white dudes in old school Hollywood, so of course reactionaries that bitch about the good ol’ exclusionary days are drawn to a film that keeps it straight & white and sees its characters cursing change. As such, said reactionaries will never stop crying over glorious Hollywood, like at least half of the country, obvs and thankfully being the very opposite of the reich wing circus show that is the current fascist administration. Sorry not sorry!
But it‘s obviously much easier to accept some of the decidedly far more unrealistic elements in The Family, hehe.
Maggie surely had to be the same as Michelle was in real life (as noted above, Michelle was in her early 50’s when she filmed this movie), which means that she had her high school aged kids when she was in her late 30’s or early 40’s. Doesn’t compute? Yeah, well that [b]does[/b] compute for me (and for many who’ve had kids past the age of 40). Side note: Ms. Pfeiffer looked [i]fine[/i] as Maggie.
Apart from aging naturally, nada. Absolutely nada.
But lol, obvious bait taken. And I like how Leo somehow became part of the conversation, bahaha. People...
Move on..... well, we’re gonna move on [i]with[/i] his “presumably” resurrected character and follow him in his new adventures in the sequel. There’s no other choice! :-]
Interesting
“
Umm.... yuck.
But this is the way the modern paranoid regressive thinks. Pftt... modern. No, actually this is how it’s always been for the false equivalence-loving, claim certain properties as their own, and fear mongering regressive — it’s conservatism 101. F*ck “the good old days”! The pro-exclusion, unchallenged (to hell with constitutional change!), and overall very safe vanilla days (which were pc AF). So Shapiro, please! :|
Or... Foghorn Leghorn? XD
Dug it I did.
^What they said. He physically couldn’t - he was stabbed with a very powerful weapon (presumably one of the most dangerous in the universe) that basically disrupted his powers and thus phase he could not..
[b][i]Must follow orders[/i][/b]
It’s been pretty pleasing, oh yes.
By “everyone” it means a lot of people. K, most people. And why is that? The preference and overall praise for the film in discussion baffles it. Now reading some positive critic reviews of the film (or simply looking up what good ol’ Kevin Smith thought about this epic) could prove to be helpful for it. But obviously, that just won’t do. It wants to know why. [b]WANTS![/b] And surely it’ll get THE answer in little o’ moviechat. ;)
Well excuse me, but what u need to know is... [url]https://media1.tenor.com/images/d565d0519a90092f589684b9fe43168c/tenor.gif?itemid=8012262[/url]
Fanboys of that non-Marvel comic brand (yes it’s time for puerile fanboy labeling - you’re familiar with that) and the regular anti-Marvel trolls on here are with ya more than anyone else, bro. But don’t fret.... even a few diehards feel similarly to you about Endgame. Fortunately, *most* don’t and rightfully think highly of this film (and would never consider it inferior to the previous ones like you and those down below do). #sorrynotsorry
Yeah, that is quite noteworthy if I do say so myself. And considering the film was made with little money, it turned out to be a ginormous success overall. As such, it’s interesting albeit [i]kinda[/i] strange to think of it as the last blockbuster of 2020 before COVID-19 took over (so to speak) and consequently movie theaters and everything else had to shut their doors.
Oh
[url]https://media1.tenor.com/images/9dc2958605bec10b2cfdb36daa7b236f/tenor.gif?itemid=13657504[/url]
One of my favorites she is
More than once I thought that was Kate in ScarJo’s profile pic (at first glance of course). Minus those lips, I do see the resemblance.
The coolest of the cool. Been loving the [b]Keanussance![/b]
Yeah, ok.
Now it’s time for me to watch it a 3rd time!
Why... yes it is! The general consensus is that it delivers the goods in a big way, after all. Now you could feel similarly to the OP and be unimpressed by it, but most people (negative critics on movie boards like these notwithstanding) think that it is, in fact, a [b]very[/b] good film. But, providing it doesn’t impress you as much as it did many others, the film is definitely not a time waster.
Damn fine film.
That could explain it.
Short Term 12
Captain Marvel
The Glass Castle
Honorable mentions: Room, Unicorn Store, Skull Island, United States of Tara. Love her!
(And fragile alt reich trolls blah)
Heh.
Alright, well I far prefer the cleverer, more impactful and [b]superior film[/b] that is The Invisible Man. Hollow Man more macho? Lol, thankfully I’m not concerned with such pettiness (girls be icky!). For real. What’s more, Elisabeth Moss’ performance in Invisible Man easily blows away Shue’s acting in Hollow Man.
Verhoeven’s sinister-ish yet cheesy flick is still a fun watch. That said, apart from Kevin Bacon’s performance and the special effects, nothing about Hollow Man is A+. So this isn’t close — I’ll take Whannell’s more expertly-crafted and tense film over HM any day of the week (the dudebros and oldheads can keep their supposedly macho flick).