Count the trannies. - Fallout (2024) Discussion

[–] Lord Rake (4454) 7 months ago

It only makes sense considering they are .0000000000001% of the population. It's hard to make a movie without half a dozen of them with those numbers.

reply

[–] CDWard (122) 7 months ago

Indeed.

reply

[–] moviechatter2526 (147) 7 months ago

Especially after a nuclear apocalypse. Then again, if radiation can litter the landscape with all manner of ugly, horrifying monsters, a few trannies here and there wouldn't be that out of the question.

reply

[–] RipRoss (557) 7 months ago

That’s a good point. This might actually be a case where transsexual representation is warranted.

reply

[–] Lord Rake (4454) 7 months ago

Why would the radiation cause men to dress like women? And if the radiation caused males to be born with female genitalia, or females to be born with male genitalia, wouldn't they just be normal?

reply

[–] moviechatter2526 (147) 7 months ago

Maybe it mutated their brains.

reply

[–] Daisy_Mabel (122) 7 months ago

Oh no, someone is triggered by seeing a trans individual! Dude, not everyone gets scared when they see someone trans, gay or black human beings. Grow the fuck up and face your true demons.

reply

[–] Lord Rake (4454) 7 months ago

You believe in imaginary things, you can grow up. I take reality for what it is, sometimes it sucks and we cannot be what we can be in dreamland but that's life.

reply

[–] Burk48917 (11356) 6 months ago

You are so brave to ignore logic so that you may virtue signal. 🙏

reply

[–] Kowalski (75528) 7 months ago

FUTURISTIC SCI-FI....BUT...WHO CARES ANYWAY?...I MEAN WHO CARES OTHER THAN WHINEY INTERNET WEIRDOS?

reply

[–] tvfan (12729) 7 months ago

On a woke scale of (1-5), it sounds like this is a four or five.

reply

[–] maximmm (3335) 7 months ago

looks like they aiming for an oscar award - if it were a film, that is

reply

[–] Satan2016 (25525) 7 months ago

Go back to playing Duke Nukem. Surely there's a movie by now.

reply

[–] Zinger (2334) 7 months ago

Which ones?

The only one I see is the girl, who's clearly a girl, will always be a girl, and hasn't chopped off her tits so obviously isn't taking her role as man as seriously as she ought to... Because she's a girl.

Kinda hot too.

But who are the others?

reply

[–] AbolishWokeness (32) 7 months ago

Most "females" in real life and on TV are transgender now. I'm a professional transvestigator and based on my estimates, at least 8 out of 10 "women" are transgenders. Most of them are pretending they are not. Take Obama's "wife" as an example. Also, Lady Gaga, Taylor Swift, Kaitlyn Jenner, Kate Middleton, Don Lemon, Katie Holmes, etc....

If you see a "woman" on that show, then there a 90% chance that "she" is actually a man. That Elle Purrel "chick", yeap. A dude.

reply

[–] RoloTony (1285) 7 months ago

Kaitlyn Jenner??....say it ain't so!

reply

[–] AbolishWokeness (32) 7 months ago

I shit you not. Extremely attractive person that looks very feminine, but I assure you that chick has a dick.

reply

[–] Alex (1503) 7 months ago

Exactly. If OP counted 4, its up to him to at least give their character names. Otherwise, he's full of shit.

reply

[–] Rorikon (17855) 7 months ago

If the trannies can trick my mind into thinking they're the sex they want to be, all more power to them. Voice has to be that sex as well. There are lots of hot trannies out there, try image searching it.

reply

[–] liscarkat (18373) 7 months ago

It doesn't matter how convincing looking they are. They're still dudes, not women.

reply

[–] CaptBeefBlower (245) 7 months ago

As Ted said, there are no chicks with dicks, only guys with tits.

reply

[–] RoloTony (1285) 7 months ago

That's all well and good until he flops out his 10 inch cock and wants to plow your asshole...

reply

[–] Kowalski (75528) 7 months ago

WHO SAID THEY WERE GAY?

reply

[–] RoloTony (1285) 7 months ago

The same people who said they weren’t gay.

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17407) 7 months ago

It's a trap!

reply

[–] Alex (1503) 7 months ago

The only one that was beyond obvious and distracting was Max's soldier buddy.
What were the rest?

reply

[–] CDWard (122) 7 months ago

I have already lost interest in this topic/series.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75528) 7 months ago

BASELESS CLAIMS FOLLOWED BY LAZY RESPONSES...WOW...WHAT A WINNER.

reply

[–] Blackbeard (153) 7 months ago

Typical incel coward is more like it in @CDWard's case.

reply

[–] moviechatterer (15583) 7 months ago

"I have already lost interest in this topic/series."

oh what a tradgedy ,
and you were so excited and keen earlier ! you were up to 4 !

reply

[–] AbolishWokeness (32) 7 months ago

Great response. Honestly, at this point it's up to your detractors to prove that the "women" are not trannies. If they cannot do that, then we have no choice by to assume that they are transgenders. This isn't just good advice for movie/tv shows, but also for real life. I'm currently in the process of exposing my wife for her lies about being born a man. I don't know how I was so trusting to the point that I allowed a man to bear and give birth to four of my children. Never again. My blinders are off.

reply

[–] Alex (1503) 7 months ago

Are you retarded? I asked him to point out the other 3 he recognized and he wouldnt answer. Probably cause he's full of shit, just like your lying ass.

reply

[–] moviechatterer (15583) 7 months ago

" at this point it's up to your detractors to prove "

nope, because you guys (the tiny minority who make zero difference to revenues) are the ones all upset and boycotting the show.

Everyone else just enjoying it for what it is.

reply

[–] Alex (1503) 7 months ago

I guess you're full of shit after all.
Seethe, mald, cope.

reply