MovieChat Forums > CDWard
![avatar](/images/no-avatar.png)
CDWard (158)
Posts
Wait, so who was the gay one?
Surprisingly good.
Personally, I can't wait for Sex Robots.
So this is, in fact, a dude?
So offbeat-gorgeous for so many years...
*A* Thing, not *the* Thing.
Parents, please pre-watch this before you show it to your young children.
Revolvers with suppressors.
Kind of prescient...
"Unironically Robotic".
View all posts >
Replies
You don't appear to have been paying attention these last few years...
I've always thought so. He's had his moments, but on the whole definitely over-hyped.
I believe that was the general idea.
Well, it's a story, so you can spin just about any way you want, but I'd be willing to bet the writers had it in mind that Blair was already a Thing when he was hauled off to the shed.
<i><b>"Watchin' Norris in there gave me the idea that... maybe every part of him was a whole, every little piece was an individual animal with a built-in desire to protect its own life. Ya see, when a man bleeds, it's just tissue, but blood from one of you Things won't obey when it's attacked. It'll try and survive..."</i></b>
I'm inclined to posit that creates like this, while they may cooperate with each other to a general degree (repeatedly inciting confusion and conflict like the Palmer-Thing, for example) so long as the playing field is open, would not be above screwing each other over if they found themselves in a "him-or-me" situation. Such creatures seem unlikely to form, or to be a component of, a gestalt.
I submit it that Blair was already A Thing before he was placed in the shed. He had already ransacked the vehicles for spare parts; he wanted uninterrupted isolation to build his little flying saucer, so he faked psychosis.
But, men really are all evil and sexist....
Yes. This show was full of Lycra-skinned lovelies.
Probably something to do with the "patients who have been damaged".
One of the trailers basically spills the whole thing.
View all replies >