MovieChat Forums > The Fighter (2010) Discussion > Bale is a distractingly bad actor

Bale is a distractingly bad actor


This has always bothered me: It takes an actor without any sense of subtlety whatsoever for people to sit back and say, "What a great actor." Throughout The Fighter, it felt as though Bale was winking to the camera, saying, "Look at me, everybody! I'm acting! Now where's my Oscar?" I was constantly taken out of the film because of Bale's distractingly self-conscious performance.

Good actors work with such subtlety that their performances go unnoticed, and, unfortunately, are often not recognized. Bale's performance in The Fighter is just the opposite: Loud, self-conscious, and totally distracting.

EDIT: This thread won't die, largely because the majority of people replying are misunderstanding my argument. For that reason, I'll reiterate the clarification I made earlier:

It's possible to play a loud character and do it right. For example, the character of Taketoki Washizu in Akira Kurosawa's Throne of Blood is one that requires a broad performance. Toshirô Mifune delivers just that in a way that keeps me engaged in the film from beginning to end.

By contrast to Mifune's performance, Christian Bale broadcasts the fact that he's acting in a way that takes me out of the movie. My problem isn't with the loud character--my problem is the way Bale performs the character in a manner that makes him seem like he is acting, thereby taking me out of the film, rather than seamlessly embodying the character as a good actor should.

reply

[deleted]

If you'd known Dicky long before this film and had seen him and Micky together, you'd never for one second think Bale was overacting or that "lacking subtlety" was a problem in this performance.

Now: Given the truism that factuality is never a defense for unconvincing fiction, it IS true that the part of Dicky Eklund is really difficult to play without seeming a bit unreal, even if you do him so well his own sister is fooled at times when your face is turned (as one of Eklund's sisters says in the featurette on the DVD--maybe you should tell her just how dumb she was to be fooled by an unsubtle performance). That is a distinct possibility, and if true, it leaves you with a real problem: Those who had some familiarity with Eklund and Ward before see the performance as spot-on because they know Eklund actually _is_ like that, while others find the performance hard to believe because they _don't_ know he's like that. That's a tough problem, but it's not Bale's, and it doesn't make him a "bad actor."

Further, your subject line indicates that this is not just a bad performance but a bad actor. Not that being in a very small minority makes you wrong, but did it ever occur to you that it might just be you who's missing the boat, if it's true that you think he's a bad actor in general?

reply

RE: vulpix - You know, you're right. That's probably why he won an Oscar for it.

I have to return some video tapes.

reply

I just don't get the whole discussion. Look around you: there are lots of loud and anoying people in real life. And that's the kind of character Bale had to play here. i don't see how he could do that in a "more subtile" way

reply

lol... this is an amusing thread. The OP might be on to something.



"Where is Aron?" - Adam
"I don't know. I'm not my brother's keeper." - Cal

reply

[deleted]

Perhaps actors should ask you for an opinion on which performance would suit you in their next movie, so that they don't stray away from your expectations...
the only problem is you need to own a studio to be able to have that kind of influence. Except, with such ideas your studio would not last very long.

Owning a studio notwithstanding, here is an idea: watch a performance with your ego checked at the door. That will uncover a world of performances and movies you have not seen (although you may have watched them), including the Fighter.

reply

[deleted]