Well, like I described, ridiculous
Yes they're giant acid-spewing space insects that eat their way out of human bodies
Ah, that might be an interesting speculation, but I did not see a shred of anything that pointed to that or implied it. Did you?
All we're privy to is what the crew think happened and what the android told them, we do not know anything beyond that other than
someone programmed it to retrieve an alien specimen. However, it would be the simplest explanation if we're going by Alien lore.
If a single alien does not need an off to reproduce, then why go through all the energy to make a queen and lay them
It's like a bee hive. They become more efficient at laying eggs if they have a Queen. It takes more energy for one drone to create an egg compared to a Queen whose sole purpose is to reproduce.
if it can grow to enormous proportions without eating humans, or anything else, why would it need humans to develop an egg?
It's shown in the director's cut that the aliens are able to consume humans as well in order to grow, as well as other material. In the first films the creature grows rapidly, but it is postured that the Alien was feeding off the metal on the ship.
I mean, if there is some coherent story or logic that parallels the movie, that's one thing, but if they just throw some line out there for the audience to hand-wave an illogical and contradictory life-cycle story that is another
I don't recall characters throwing out lines ever really explaining much about the life cycle other than the obvious. The reason for the confusion is that the first two movies offered different interpretations to the alien's reproductive process, compounded by the footage of its life cycle in the first movie being deleted and only officially added in 2003.
reply
share