The movie is deliberately ambiguous about the background and motives of the shark, leaving the audience to connect the dots for themselves.
No it isn't. It's sloppily put together due to the rushed production, studio being bereft of ideas, and just wanted to milk the franchise once more for profit.
If you actually read into the films' production history, you'll know this.
Modern viewers like to have everything explained to them in black and white so when an unconventional work comes along that subverts their expectations, they donât know how to respond.
Wait, what? So you think all the negativity comes from modern audiences? Hahaha you're funny. This movie was slammed right from the beginning, for the same reasons it still is now.
Again, if you'd done your research, you'd already know this.
To quote several reviews from professional critics:
âIâm not sure who greenlighted this thing, but Iâd bet theyâre not working in the film industry anymore. Simply put, the script is awfulâmy seven-year-old daughter makes up better stories than this when sheâs trying to avoid getting in trouble.â
- Mike Bracken, Culture dose.
"Jaws the Revenge is not simply a bad movie, but also a stupid and incompetent one. The screenplay is simply a series of meaningless episodes of human behaviour, punctuated by shark attacks"
- Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun Times.
And the audience reception was just as bad, hence its' bad buzz and diminishing returns at the box office.
You may not realize it, but the fact that yourâe still piecing the puzzle together is a credit to the filmmakersâ audacity.
It seems once again you've misunderstood my previous quote:
"You do realise that pondering and calling out obvious flaws (in this case logical errors, plot holes, and narrative inconsistencies) are two VERY DIFFERENT things, right?"
reply
share