....to see a highly dubious and most likely staged incident at the Oscars telecast and now this is all you people have to talk about during a period when the world is under threat of nuclear war.
AMERICAN IDIOT #1: I think Will Smith was wrong!
AMERICAN IDIOT #2: no Chris Rock was wrong! He should never have made those alopecia jokes about Jada!
AMERICAN IDIOT #3: God bless Will Smith! He just protecting his family!
BIDEN: The US is committed to a military action that could last decades. We have to take up the reins of leadership in the New World Order!
It's not really a thing on this site soo much, but IMDB taught me just how much some Europeans hate us. This was loooong before the trolls took over that site. I'm talking back in 05. Anti-American sentiment was rampant on the politics and religion boards.
You're right about one thing: the world has been a thorn in our ass for a hundred years, and to be honest, we're getting sick of bailing your asses out.
Japan was being squeezed by embargoes because they were attacking China years before Pearl. All Japan had to do was not be an expansionist empire with plans to rape and rule the South Pacific.
In other words, it was Japan's own actions that caused their downfall just as Germany caused her own downfall.
Oh, so sorry! Your definition of "colonialist" is wrong. (sad trombone noise here). Thanks for playing!! Make sure you pick up your Rice-A-Roni on the way out!
Colonialist: adjective
characteristic of or involving the practice of gaining political control over other countries and occupying them with settlers.
No wonder you were so keen on trotting out the sad trombone noises. You must be sick of hearing them at your expense. You naturally wanted to try them out on someone else. Sad, then, that you chose to try it at that particular moment.
Incidentally, what definition do you use? You're obviously confusing it with something else. This is a learning opportunity for you to correctly distinguish between two, yes, TWO... words you are using incorrectly.
Besides which, the fact you missed the point of my initial comment is proving the point I was making. American's aren't interested in anything outside America, unless and until it affects them, their oil prices, or some other facet of their incestuous lives. Either personally, or as a nation.
No, I was absolutely using the word correctly.
Colonialist: adjective
characteristic of or involving the practice of gaining political control over other countries and occupying them with settlers.
Doesn't apply. Sorry. You have been well indoctrinated comrade.
So, you aren't interested in the proper use of words?
Odd... I expected you to just be wrong. It seems you've just proved you are wrong AND are being wilfully ignorant.
Unless you can show me why my definition of the word doesn't apply in this case, your assertion that I am using the word incorrectly is not proven. Thus the default position is that I am right.
Listen... I'm open to the possibility of me being wrong if it can be proven I'm wrong. The only caveat is that it needs someone who can argue the point logically and with reason. Unfortunately for you, your argument consists of wiping your ass with your hand then licking your hand clean afterwards.
Yeah, sadly, some Americans are like that. Wait till you meet some of the "patriotic" ones in person. You'll have a hard time not laughing in their faces during a casual conversation.
You are exactly right. It was both Japan and Germany's own aggression that doomed them both. If they had stayed quiet, nothing would have happened. Or in Hitler's case, if he had cooled it after taking The Sudentenland.
Also, does this support other's claims of U.S. "colonialism"? If that was the goal, it wouldn't have rebuilt both countries and allowed them to their own self-determination, unlike The Soviet Union's vision of East Germany. Oh well, can't argue with haters.
Seriously? You come here to preach your crap about nothing better to talk about under the threat of nuclear war and your latest post is this:
How much beaver?
posted an hour ago by Metatron1970 (3821)
1 reply | jump to latest
I've forgotten how much beaver is in this movie. Is it more than Porky's? Do you think it's real or a merkin?
You want to post that crap fine, but don't come here bitching about what others post when you have nothing useful to contribute either.
I have varied interests. The questions about the full frontal nudity were valid and unrelated to my critique of this staged incident at the Oscars. You will not shame me for liking movies like Porky's. I don't listen to prudes.
Yup they've started to look through your profile and previous posts for ammunition (pardon the pun to our American friends) to use against you. Not a good sign.
The Americans have adopted this cancel culture which is anathema to free expression. Many of them think themselves very enlightened and progressive because they have warped ideas about words like "socialism" and "leftism" now. Many Americans erroneously equate the Democratic Party's fixation on Identity Politics as progressive when in fact it is horrifyingly reactionary.