Amid criticism, IMDb founder, Col Needham, steps down from CEO position after 35 years.
Criticism includes disbanding message boards and launching redesign.
The boards were one of the main reasons I went to that site, and ending them is how I found MovieChat. They probably didn't want some of the content ruining their squeaky clean image, which likely was a risk for anyone that might advertise.
Keeping the boards was a no brainer for me, as I am sure it drove fan traffic. But perhaps they cared more about the corporate and content provider side of the business.
One of three, that's a third. 10 million message boarders who never look at IMDb anymore. Plus we stayed on that site for hours at a time and were the ones who actually read the ads.
The IMDb message boards were notorious for trolling and hyperbolic reviews of movies and actors. Nobody blamed IMDb management. It was kitsch culture. IMDb made a huge mistake.
I've always thought the word Colonel should have been spelled Cerrnal. The way that Colonel is spelled it sounds like it should be said, "Co-lo-nell".
Speaking of pronunciation, I was thinking earlier when you wrote "tots" and completely befuddled me that it might be helpful if you started writing using those pronunciation symbols like they show in the dictionary going forward. (H)wät dü yü thingk?
It only took me about 15 minutes to figure out how to type that sentence phonetically.
Keeping the boards was a no brainer for me, as I am sure it drove fan traffic
According to what they said at the time they removed them, the boards really didn't drive the traffic at IMDb. They said less than 7% of IMDb visitors used the boards. That said, it was still a lot of people in raw numbers.
But I think you're right that the decision will have been based on corporate priorities, advertising revenue and whatnot. They weren't profitable and they may have been hurting Amazon's brand, as IMDb had a reputation for being a troll magnet. (No more than most places on the internet, if you ask me, but if you're Amazon, you don't need that headache if you're not making money from it anyway.)
reply share
This is why we can't have nice things. Even here many people are just looking for a fight by turning everything political or looking to spar on the wokeness of movies. Even legitimate disagreements are often laced with personal insults... why? Such encounters are rare in real life.
But once in a while I stumble on to good discussions. I wonder if the trolls are a vocal minority, or if this is a true reflection of society as it stands today.
Wokeness is an attempt to force a perverse political agenda into our entertainment, and is responsible for the death of entire genres like Comedy, and accounts for much of the decline in quality as crew are hired for diversity instead of talent.
It is impossible to talk about modern Hollywood films without mentioning the glaring issue of woke.
Woke = the African-American English synonym for the General American English word awake, has since the 1930s or earlier been used to refer to awareness of social and political issues affecting African Americans.
You support Nazi salutes from Musk and releasing white supremacists from prison which is the reason you despise "woke".
Even legitimate disagreements are often laced with personal insults... why? Such encounters are rare in real life.
Same reason as road rage , its the "disconnection" . People feel "separated" from the world in a car , and feel they can hurl insults at other drivers just as if they are insulting a fictional character on tv.
Same , and even more so , for the keyboard warriors at home talking anonymously on the internet.
Amazon owned the IMDb for nearly 20 years before they got rid of the boards. I think if bad reviews were putting a serious dent in their core retail business, they would have acted rather sooner.
Amazon sells everything. I can't imagine people disliking the Ghostbusters remake - or any other movie, really - even showing up on their spreadsheets. There will have been lots of bad movies since 1998 that weren't well-reviewed by IMDb users and didn't sell well on Amazon's website. The two things are not directly related, except that they're both a result of a movie being bad.
No, no, it's far likelier that the reputation the IMDb boards had were denting advertising revenues. After all, they kind of alluded to trolling being an issue in their statements surrounding the closure.
If the imdb boards stayed open, then they needed revamping. The blocking system was terrible, you could see your trolls following you around, and when you posted on an old movie's board, then you may as well have been talking to yourself, unlike here on MC where every topic goes straight to the top of the page for everyone to see.
It's funny — I wrote the exact same thing in a reply to Onan on the next page of this thread, where he also mentioned Luigi. I told him that if he ends up on the jury, he should remember: the verdict is 'not guilty.'
However, there was such a rich history that was erased that were in the comments from even the most obscure movies and television shows.
This remains the tragedy of the IMDb boards ending. I go to a lot of old movie and actor boards here, and there's nothing there. I do not believe they migrated everything from IMDb. I think they snatched the most prolific and popular and let the obscure boards with some of the best discussions and anecdotes die.
reply share