HEY MOVIECHAT...WHY ARE YOU BEING SUCH A DICKHEAD? - General Discussion Discussion

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

Did you see the post Kowalski ?

reply

[–] Mrmojo4700 (21452) 2 years ago

Is there something more to the story?

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

ThetaSigma said that the Mod(s) was/were sucking a certain posters cock so it's no surprise the post was deleted.

reply

[–] Mrmojo4700 (21452) 2 years ago

That was certainly a poor choice of words, but obviously born out his frustration with this constant situation.

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

Ticketsplease is a troll but he's hardly the only one at Moviechat and he does cop a constant barrage of abuse for his trolling the only result of which is that he seems to be getting worse. I think people would be better off just ignoring him if they don't like what he posts. After all the Mods decide who does or doesn't get canned here not some of the posters and that's the way it should be.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

HE SAID THAT AFTER A HOMOPHOBIC THREAD STARTED BY THE SHITSTAIN GOT MASS DELETED...YOU KNOW...EXCEPT THE SHITSTAIN'S POSTS...FULL ON BULLSHIT TOP TO BOTTOM.

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

Hey Kowalski you can stop shouting, he's back !

reply

[–] sslssg (34211) 2 years ago

I don't know if it was the same thread, but there was a recent one that was absolutely homophobic and incredibly misogynist. It was one of the reasons that I've not been posting lately.

We need at least one more mod here.

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

We need at least one more mod here.

A Mod who will delete posters that you don't like ?

reply

[–] sslssg (34211) 2 years ago

Not posters no. But I do think that there does need to be a little bit more enforcement of the site standards. There have been several posts which are blatantly prohibited content, and they are allowed. There doesn't seem to be any sort of consistency as to what is allowed and what isn't.

reply

[–] GlenEllyn (21526) 2 years ago

I agree that there are posts that appear to break the rules and are left up. But we have to understand that someone needs to actually report the post to have it reviewed by a mod. Mods don't have the time to read every single post. There are some posters here who claim they've never reported a post. That's fine. There are also posts that appear to violate the site standards, but if folks just assume that it has been reported, well...it may be that it never happened. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Mods can't win, no matter what they do.

reply

[–] sslssg (34211) 2 years ago

I agree with this 100%. Which is why I'm not bashing the mods. It's a job I'd not want. I just know that we used to have more of them, and it seems like it's mostly Mod5 doing all the work around here. That's why I was requesting more mods. Despite what Quasimodo seems to think, I don't want anyone banned just because I disagree with them. But I do want posts which violate site standards to be deleted, or at least have a warning issued. I admit I didn't report for the first couple of years because I didn't want to be annoying to the mods, but I do report posts now.

reply

[–] db20db (17235) 2 years ago

The one and only post I ever reported occurred over 5 years ago and it was from a bona fide troll who was eventually banned.

I agree. It looks like a really thankless position, much like with good cops nowadays in large cities, retiring early in record numbers.

I was approached to become a mod in a couple of other forums I belonged to. One site creator tried to entice me with the great software I'd have access to. I said, "No thanks, I'm just here to have fun and engage in interesting discussion."

reply

[–] keybored (2660) 2 years ago

Exactly.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

No, one who is consistent. For example, recently I had one of my posts deleted by a mod because I wrote a bunch of parody porn titles and the mod didn't like that there was too much profanity. However, db20db on a regular basis, harasses people and tells them to "fuck off", and none of his posts get deleted. When you look at his posting history, he does this often and somehow gets away with it. At one point I counted 10 different users that he attacked unprovoked. The standards on this site are all over the place.

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

I understand the frustration but "the art" of moderating is bound to be a messy business. I'm in the less is more camp so I like the way the Mods go about their business here. If the Mods did become more "robust" I think people would soon start bitching about that.

reply

[–] Moderator5 (1464) 2 years ago

It wasn't just profanity, it was graphic, pornographic language, as I explained in my message to you at the time.

Hello samoanjoes,

One of your posts was removed for violating MovieChat's Community Standards, specifically:

Prohibited Content:

1. Pornography, adult or mature content

You may review the full Standards here: https://moviechat.org/standards

Regards,

Moderator 5

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

And that's fine, I acknowledged that. But people like db20dbcontrantly swear and harass people here and there isn't a single mod that does anything.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

I HONESTLY LIKE DB...AND THE ENTERTAINMENT VALUE ON HIS BACK AND FORTHS WITH SOME OF YOU GUYS FAR OUTWEIGHS THE MINOR INFRACTIONS.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

He kept coming after me before I decided to finally to defend myself.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

THAT PART I DON'T AGREE WITH...HE GETS ONE MINDED WITH PEOPLE...AND SHOULD BE WARNED WHEN IT'S UNPROVOKED AND RELENTLESS...BUT THE BACK AND FORTH'S YOU GUYS HAVE WITH HIM CRACK ME UP.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

He’s a piece of busted trash.

reply

[–] Moderator5 (1464) 2 years ago

Again, swearing is not an issue. I view db20db's posts in their context, which is always part of a back-and-forth with other, equally acid-tongued members. We generally do not get involved in these situations.

We very rarely take action with respect to claims of harassment. But in two recent cases, the harassment has been obvious, repeated, and unprovoked (beyond general claims that the members are "trolls"), and it got to the point where one of them was literally begging for it to stop. It will not be allowed to continue.

If people chose to quit this site because they either can't bring themselves to ignore two people they don't like or can't restrain themselves from harassing those people, that is regrettable, but it is their choice.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

I view db20db's posts in their context, which is always part of a back-and-forth with other, equally acid-tongued members.

Always part of a back-and-forth? Where were any of the mods the first few years when he came at me for no reason and I said nothing back? So now because I've been doing what he's doing, it counts as a back-and-forth?

reply

[–] Moderator5 (1464) 2 years ago

Yes, if you are doing what he is doing, that would count as a back-and-forth.

With respect to what happened in "the first few years"– I've been a moderator since July 2017 and that has been my experience. Looking at our moderator spreadsheet, where all enforcement actions are logged, I see only one warning from another mod on his record from 5 years ago:

Informal "soft" warning for repeatedly accusing others of being Ben

Regardless, I'm not going to dig up five year-old posts to re-litigate whatever disputes may have occurred at that time.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

You should definitely look into it or take notice of him, because I'm definitely not the only one he's been hostile to. I've received DM's about him.

reply

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

Agreed. db20db has been hostile and abusive to multiple posters, often unprovoked and he has said things that were out of line on more than one occasion.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

He says he only attacks people who come after him. There were so many times the first few years I wasn't talking to or about him, and he unleashed on me. There was one occasion a few months ago where he went after Mrmojo who made a regular comment. I mean, who goes after Mrmojo? Mojo, the classy gent he is, just ignored it.

reply

[–] db20db (17235) 2 years ago

Why don't you provide a link to that and prove it, liar? You also lied to Mod 5 when you said I first came after you "for no reason." I've made myself clear about that time and again, yet you want to constantly portray yourself as some innocent victim. The reality is, you're a whiny drama queen and rabble rouser.

Mojo and I are on good terms. We wished each other Happy New Year just last night.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

Why don't you provide a link to that and prove it, liar?

I'd have to go back who knows how long to find that exact comment where you said you don't come after me unless I was talking about you. I actually called you out shortly after when you responded to me in a post that had nothing to do with you and I said, "what happened to only going after me when I'm not talking about you?" You didn't respond.

Also, last time you told me to provide you links of unprovoked attacks on other users, not just me, your response was "it's pretty pathetic that you went through my history to find these". Damned if I do, damned if I don't.

I've made myself clear about that time

That time? It was many times.

reply

[–] db20db (17235) 2 years ago

When I mentioned the link, I was talking about your allegation concerning Mojo. You made this allegation some time back, I cleared it up, now you're making it again.

If you're not putting a distorted, deceitful spin to a post of mine, or a situation, you're wildly exaggerating or just plain lying like hell! You're a real snake in the grass.

Mod 5 and Kowalski saw the truth here today.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

I sent you the link to Mojo at the time and you said that you buried the hatchet and were good. But that doesn't change the fact that you made an unprovoked attacked on one of the most lovable users on this site.

reply

[–] db20db (17235) 2 years ago

There you go again! That's what I mean by distorted spin. I don't remember you sending me a link, just the accusation. And it wasn't an "unprovoked attack" (exaggeration, lie). It was a very brief misunderstanding that was quickly cleared up and we've been getting along just fine ever since.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

He didn't respond to your attack. If you got lovey-dovey with him, it happened in another thread. If you say you cleared it up, you acknowledge the comment I was talking about exists.

reply

[–] db20db (17235) 2 years ago

One last time, snake! It was not an "attack" it was a brief misunderstanding. And he didn't ignore me (another lie), he quickly explained what he had meant and it was over within minutes. I'm pretty sure you didn't send me a link because if you had, it would have immediately disproved your allegation, so that's another lie.

You're such a whiny wuss! You once characterized a simple question I asked you as "an attack."

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

‘Snake, attention whore, dogpiler, sycophant, ass-kisser, sickening clique…etc.’ Learn some new phony accusations you broken record.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

In your attack, he didn't respond to you. There was still no response to it days later, so he obviously ignored your attack. If he explained anything, he either did that on a completely different thread, or you are referring to a different attack on him.

reply

[–] db20db (17235) 2 years ago

There was never any attack on Mojo, liar. Provide the same link you claim you did previously. It should be easy enough for you to do, to prove your allegation.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

You already responded to the link and now you want me to search for it again? You just claimed that you settled it with Mojo too.

Maybe it's better if you just stop responding to me because no matter what I say, you'll just respond with your common "there's that lying, self attention you do so often". You're just wasting your time.

reply

[–] db20db (17235) 2 years ago

I didn't respond to the nonexistent link because you never sent one, liar. Why don't we bring Mojo in here and ask him if I ever attacked him, especially in an unprovoked manner. You're a liar, always have been, that's all there is to it.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

How about this, I will no longer respond to you, and hopefully you will no longer respond to me.

Have a nice life.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

He’ll respond to you tomorrow because he’s a lifeless piece of shit.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

He probably will, but I won't even read his replies.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

Who else does the scumbag have to talk to?

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

His alleged ex-wife.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

She likely grabbed their boy and stole the car.

Smart woman!

reply

[–] Bloodshot77 (13762) 2 years ago

He is easily squashed, like a bug.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

Yeah, call for backup from a very polite poster that wants no trouble you lying scoundrel. Don’t drag other people into your sorry, pathetic lies.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

You sure do seem to have a lot of ‘misunderstandings’ with well known, valued posters.

You went after Allaby last year when he was clearly making a silly, light hearted joke that everyone else just laughed off.
Some posters just like to have fun and make jokes, they don’t need an angry asshole swooping out of nowhere firing both barrels dipshit.

You are an angry nut and I’m happy to tell you so.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

Just a few days ago he misread a comment you made and thought that it was an insult to me. Gramps needs to get some glasses.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

More desperate grasping by a worthless bum, I remember that well because I quite enjoy you and assume the feeling is mutual.

db is a loser.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

Not sure if I can be friends with a KISS fan though...

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

Hey man, you like the Winter and I’m willing to put up with that as crazy as it is!

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

Okay, fine. Friends again.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

Eh, we are never not friends Amigo. We are the founding members of the ‘sickening clique’ after all😄

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

Oh shit, our meeting was today! I totally forgot.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

No worries, I ‘dogpiled’ the pizzas for both of us👍

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

Nonsense, you jumped Mojo, one of the most laid back guys here out of the blue.

You suffer from angry fits and frequent bouts of day drinking.

Hang your head low you bullying liar.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

Baloney, a few dopey trolls aside you are a constant pest and bully here.

You’d be shocked at how many of your online ‘friends’ view you as an unnecessarily aggressive, mean spirited braggart.

Since you can’t seem to avoid me you’ll hear a lot from me going forward🖕

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

I’ve received multiple unsolicited PMs from 9 posters here that expressed their disdain for db.

I suppose by backing you up on your statement we are now ‘dogpiling’ lol.

That guy asks for it so he’s going to get it.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

I just don't get how the mods don't see this. Unprovoked attacks on so many people.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

This db character told me ages ago he hated me, etc. so I figured OK, avoid this one. Lo and behold the weirdo responds to me with angry insults every week when I’m not even posting to him and he’s not involved in the thread.
I’ve had enough of him, he’s going to get more of me than he wanted.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

He told me he hates me too. Frankly, I think he might be in love with me.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

It’s ‘attention whoring,’ one of his favorite insults. He’s retired, alone, divorced and has little contact with the family he drove off so like any bratty little punk he seeks any attention that he can get.

What a pathetic and lonely failure👎

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

Open your eyes, he claims to ‘despise’ posters and then opens fire on them a day later inviting more discourse...

I’ve responded to that useless poster with equal venom and I’m the bad guy?

There is a weird system of modding going on here.

I’m not trying to seem nice to you because I’m not a very nice guy and I’m sure modding is not easy, but if you don’t see db as a huge pest you are a blind man. Nobody likes the guy, he’s a constant fire starter.

reply

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

For the record I did not say cock at all. And while you’re revelling in this situation Quasimodo, don’t forget that you yourself have said far more obscene things here. But not to worry, you’ll always be safe because your bigotry is EXACTLY the type of filth that the MovieChat hopes to promote, protect and nurture.

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

I knew you'd be back ! And I definitely recall seeing the use of the word "cock" but my memory is not infallible. So what did you say exactly. It was offensive to the Mod(s) wasn't it.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

THE MODS SHOULD BE CAPABLE OF HANDLING SITUATIONS FAIRLY REGARDLESS OF WHAT OFFENSE IS HURLED THEIR WAY...THT'S THE JOB.

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

The Mod(s) is/are handling the situation you just don't agree with the way they are handling it.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

NO...I LOVE THEM AND THIS SITE...BUT THEY ARE FUCKING UP ON THIS ONE.

reply

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

I certainly hope it was, because that was absolutely my intention.

And before you pat yourself on the back over your predictive powers, I didn’t say I would never be back, I said “see ya MovieChat” meaning that I’m done with posting here regularly. Which I am.

I’m fine with having that post deleted. I think the message I was sending was received loud and clear. It’s just that TexasModerator didn’t want others to see it, but he failed.

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

I think you should just stand in the naughty corner until you calm down.

reply

[–] xanthas (3215) 2 years ago

I used to come here to post about entertainment topics. I only recently started participating in political conversations because it seems this site has been hijacked by Russian bots and MAGA trolls. Really sad that this site has been allowed to drift in that direction. There are plenty of other places online for these types to post their propaganda.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

This post is an extremely rare and uncommon Kowalski W. You should write more of these.

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

No he shouldn't.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

It's rare for him. I'm going to give it to him.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

QUASI IS JUST PISSY BECAUSE I WON'T ACCEPT HIS SKYPE CALL.

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

You're such a fantasist Kowalski.

SHAKEMYHEADEMOJI

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

Yeah I get it but being a Mod would be a pain in the arse and I wouldn't do it so I think some posters should refrain from bitching about Mod(s) not doing what they want.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

I'd be a mod if I had more time to be here and was more computer savvy. I'm just saying that certain mods have their favourites because there have been blatant infractions where nothing is done, and then harmless ones get deleted.

reply

[–] BeaSouth (3282) 2 years ago

You’d be be an excellent Mod SJ. You are a reasonable and even-handed person and respectful when you disagree with people. The only bad judgment you have demonstrated involves your disdain for the Beach Boys.

reply

[–] samoanjoes (56640) 2 years ago

Maybe it's better I'm not a mod. Beach Boys fans are permanently banned.

reply

[–] db20db (17235) 2 years ago

He's too deceitful to ever be a mod, much less a good one. It's this type of thinking that leads to the wrong types of people in positions where they don't belong and why we have such a turbulent world.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

JUST TO BE CLEAR...THIS IS THE FIRST SITE I HAVE POSTED ON IN A LONG TIME THAT I MYSELF AM NOT A MOD...I HAVE BEEN MODERATING ASSHOLE TEA PARTIES SINCE THE EARLY 2000'S...THIS SITE IS UNDER-MANNED AND LOSING ACTUAL POSTERS AT A HIGHER RATE THAN IT'S PICKING UP TROLLS...THIS CURRENT SITUATION BEING DISCUSSED IS CLEARLY A PROBLEM...A PROBLEM THAT IS BEING HANDLED IN A VERY SUSPICIOUS MANNER.

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

Yeah well I don't agree with your take on it Kowalski. I think the lack of traffic on Moviechat has got more to do with a small clique of old posters ( don't forget I'm an "old" poster here too ) who think they own this place and have the right to run people off if they don't like them which they try to do on a regular basis.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

PEOPLE I DON'T LIKE...

RACISTS.
PEDOPHILES.
HOMOPHOBIC ASSHOLES.
TROLLS WITH NOTHING TO ADD BUT UGLINESS.

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

Yeah that's fine Kowalski you can like or dislike whoever you want but you don't get to have them deleted from Moviechat on your say so.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

NO...I DON'T...BUT I DO GET TO SAY SOMETHING IF I DON'T AGREE WITH SOMETHING...WHICH IS WHAT I HAVE DONE...WHAT EXACTLY IS YOUR ARGUMENT ANYWAY?...THAT MOVIECHAT WOULD BE BETTER WITH ZERO RULES?

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

I thought my argument would have been crystal clear by now but apparently not. So here it is again:

The Mods do the moderating not us.

And why yes Kowlaski obviously I think Moviechat would be much much much better with no rules at all, you idiot.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

YOUR FINAL STATEMENT MAKES YOUR ARGUMENT MOOT.

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

Well I'll be mooted !

reply

[–] moviechatterer (15583) 2 years ago

Yeah that's fine Kowalski you can like or dislike whoever you want but you don't get to have them deleted from Moviechat on your say so.

True , but the list of criteria he specified for "not liking people"
RACISTS.
PEDOPHILES.
HOMOPHOBIC ASSHOLES.
TROLLS WITH NOTHING TO ADD BUT UGLINESS.

... also coincides with (is a subset of ) valid reasons for banning people doesnt it ?

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

Well it's been a while since I looked over the terms and conditions of Moviechat but I don't think it actually spells things out in specific detail like that, it was more vague from memory. I get what you're saying and what Kowalski was saying but I keep repeating my point which is it's the Mods job to ban people not for some of the users to go all vigilante and try to do the job themselves.

reply

[–] moviechatterer (15583) 2 years ago

Yeah I went and had a look at the terms after posting that , but I couldnt even find the general section on user behavior amongst all the other legal mumbo jumbo .

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

Yep I missed it first time as well and when a Mod coincidentally pointed out the actual relevant part of the T&C it was really brief, just a line which allowed a lot of discretion from memory.

reply

[–] BeaSouth (3282) 2 years ago

I generally agree with this observation. I am a part-time poster, long-time reader and see this becoming more common. If you lack a 5- or 6- figure post count and express an unfashionable observation, it often seems met with coordinated criticism, insults, and ostracism from certain high-volume posters. I’m not saying it’s universal but it is a trend that has caused me to come here less.

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

Yes it's definitely a thing. Moviechat has been going for five years now and yet it stubbornly remains a quiet little backwater in spite of being a clone of the old IMDb message boards. There has to be a reason for it.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

YES...IT IS DEFINITELY PEER PRESSURE.🤨

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

That is a self-serving way of looking at it. Bullying people you don't like to drive them away and keep this place like a small and exclusive club for the "PEER APPROVED MUTUAL BACK SLAPPERS" is bad behaviour and bad for Moviechat.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

I AGREE ...ANYONE DOING THAT NEEDS TO HAVE THEIR PEEPEE WHACKED.

reply

[–] db20db (17235) 2 years ago

You're spot on with this observation. It's a trend that has existed here since the site's earliest days. I have seen promising, quality newcomers leave because of what they see as the cliquishness on this board.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

Bullshit.
Most users here are decent people and enjoy music, movies, TV and general posts, you are a total asshole.

You are not fooling anyone but total idiots you liar.

reply

[–] db20db (17235) 2 years ago

I noticed you quickly edited out Mod 5 from your comment, chickenshit, when it supposedly comes to fooling people.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

You have a ridiculously high regard for yourself. Glad to know that I baited you into a trap again.

MOD 5 is your buddy, I know his handle but I have manners unlike you.
I won’t name that one publicly but it’s pretty obvious.

Baited again shithead?

reply

[–] db20db (17235) 2 years ago

You've been trying to bait me for hours now. Into a trap? Hardly.

You've really been pressing your luck lately, getting posts deleted by a Mod and alienating more posters with your ranting, hateful bullshit. Keep on projecting, chickenshit.

reply

[–] ShogunofYonkers (77357) 2 years ago

Hook, Line and Sinker every time dummy.

Report me.

reply

[–] TexasJack (12516) 2 years ago

Not just newcomers. Do you remember Dazed? She left Moviechat years ago unfortunately and deleted her account along with many of her posts. The last one was talking about exactly this situation. I didn't get it at the time. Now I do.

It also seems that the sewing circle has been circulating my name as being the moderator. Pretty funny stuff because I think BillHicksFan was Mod5 last month. Though it does explain a few things I had been wondering about lately.

Time for me to take a little break.

reply

[–] db20db (17235) 2 years ago

Do I ever! She was a favorite poster, a smart woman with a great sense of humor. We were discussing our concerns over that pattern via PMs shortly before she did that and she had one particular trouble maker very accurately pegged.

reply

[–] Bloodshot77 (13762) 2 years ago

It also seems that the sewing circle has been circulating my name as being the moderator. Pretty funny stuff because I think BillHicksFan was Mod5 last month.

Nice deflection! Not falling for it

reply

[–] db20db (17235) a year ago

TexasJack's (one of our best, most articulate posters) last post here. His "little break" has become over half a year by now and I haven't seen the slightest peep referencing his disappearance. Correct me if I'm wrong.

reply

[–] TrentnQuarantino (9187) 2 years ago

Time after time I've reported posts that just use the most disgusting and ugly profanity, one ... two .... three times until one of MC's supposed moderators tells me to stop reporting it. I'm talking nothing else in the text of the post but profanity, insults, hate-speech, etc and the moderators do nothing after it is brough to their attention multiple times.

reply

[–] DMT (4369) 2 years ago

this site would be ruined if it became a sanitized libturd safe space. the internet used to be the wild west when i was a kiddo, i miss those days everybody grew such a huge pussy lately

reply

[–] FredBurroughs (21447) 2 years ago

Is it possible for you to compose a single post that does not emanate the stench of someone who spends all day typing out vitriol in a terminally online echo chamber on their cell phone, or would that be asking for the moon?

reply

[–] DMT (4369) 2 years ago

ur really throwing rocks in a glass house bud having 15x times the posts I have on here...

reply

[–] FredBurroughs (21447) 2 years ago

123Guy previously mentioned that he told his girlfriend about me and my post count and it made her laugh. Are you his girlfriend?

https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/637d75a9955e851aa6be866c/do-women-miss-chivalry?reply=637d8573955e851aa6be870e

Also, please explain what the rocks and glass house thing means because it's kind of hard for me to grasp metaphors when they're thrown about by someone who fails to utilize basic grammar.

reply

[–] DMT (4369) 2 years ago

whatever u grammar nazi, i would of thought someone as edumicated as urself would of understood such a basic common saying...

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (38068) 2 years ago

Actually, it’s nearer 10x (Mathematical Andy).

reply

[–] DMT (4369) 2 years ago

you got me there i was really baked when i added up those maths lol

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (38068) 2 years ago

It was a gentle tease. Thank you for taking it in the spirit it was intended.

reply

[–] DMT (4369) 2 years ago

😁

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

THOSE HOURS YOU SPENT ON THE WILD WILD WEST INTERNET AS A KIDDO FUCKED YOU UP,BRO.

reply

[–] DMT (4369) 2 years ago

nawwwwww they made me the great great successful man I am today :)

reply

[–] Ticketsplease (4024) 2 years ago

Those who complain should leave. Freedom of speech should be protected.

reply

[–] DMT (4369) 2 years ago

exactly this forum was created in the first place for the sole fact that the libturd tech overlords running amazon hate free speech and totally shutdown the imdb forums burnings decades of internet conversations and history just because it is virtually impossible to censor like they would like to as if they were some soviet big brother spies...

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

NO

reply

[–] DMT (4369) 2 years ago

YES

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (38068) 2 years ago

Maybe.

reply

[–] Drooch (5333) 2 years ago

Nothing gets Leftists screeching more than when they can’t censor and ban other people. This thread is hilarious.

reply

[–] DMT (4369) 2 years ago

their views are so retarded they cant defend them with free speech. there only hope of domination is to restrict free speech like there Stalinist role models they look up too

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

HEY,YOU EVER NOTICE HOW THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO FIND IT NECESSARY TO THROW OUT THE FREE SPEECH EXCUSE ARE ALL DICKHEADS WITH NO MANNERS GRASPING AT STRAWS TO MENTALLY VALIDATE THEIR OWN SCUMBAG NATURE?

reply

[–] DMT (4369) 2 years ago

free speech excuse? its the First Amendment!!

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

IT IS...AND IT IS A WONDERFUL THING...PEOPLE WHO USE IT AS AN EXCUSE TO BE MANNERLESS DICKBAGS SUCK THOUGH.

reply

[–] DMT (4369) 2 years ago

the world had too many manners these days we need more dickheads like myself to balance it all out

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

YOUR DEFINITION OF MANNERS MUST BE FLAWED.

reply

[–] Drooch (5333) 2 years ago

Exactly correct, and it’s fun to watch them squirm as they desperately try to pretend to themselves and others that they’re the good guys while they tyrannise people.

I don’t know how they can live with themselves, let alone sleep at night.

reply

[–] db20db (17235) 2 years ago

Freedom! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rynxqdNMry4

reply

[–] Ticketsplease (4024) 2 years ago

There are other sites so don't let the door hit you on the way out! The mods do a fantastic job.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

I WILL BE HERE LONG AFTER YOU ARE GONE,FRENCHIE.

reply

[–] ItsGood2BeRight (3879) 2 years ago

LOL whatever! You just threatened me a couple days ago. You invited me to your home so you could beat me to a bloody pulp. I'm paraphrasing of course. Be tougher...sticks and stones ya big baby.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

INVENTING BULLLSHIT I SEE...THATS NOT TOUGH AT ALL.

reply

[–] JoeBlow88 (559) 2 years ago

Leave, you wont be missed. You are the most toxic person on this site.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

DID YOU NOTICE HOW ALL YOU LATE TO THE PARTY FUCKERS ARE COMPLETE WASTES OF SKIN?

reply

[–] ItsGood2BeRight (3879) 2 years ago

You are always so toxic. Seems like you can not get heated without insulting anyone.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

LMAO...YOUR DISPLAY OF IGNORANCE IS COMPLETE.

NOW...WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE SITCOM?🙂

reply

[–] Ticketsplease (4024) 2 years ago

Your mental breakdowns are sad to witness. I think you actually need help.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

BAD FICTION,MISTER ANUS.

reply

[–] ItsGood2BeRight (3879) 2 years ago

Another insult. You really do have breakdowns though. I think because you're always home like a woman you forget how to control your emotions like a man.

reply

[–] Kowalski (75520) 2 years ago

PURE SPECULATION AND ASSUMPTION...MAKES YOU SEEM WEAK MINDED.

reply