“It Will Be the Policy of the United States That There Are Only Two Genders”
...Male and Female". Cry about THAT, snowflakes!
https://tinyurl.com/2p8awkmu
...Male and Female". Cry about THAT, snowflakes!
https://tinyurl.com/2p8awkmu
LOL, I think the vast majority of Democrats aren’t crying. They never even believed in all of this stupid gender shit. They just latched onto the fad because they thought it was a winning strategy. Now that America has universally rejected the idea that men can get pregnant and that there are 49 sets of pronouns the Democrats have pretty much kicked the gender activists to the curb and forgotten about them. Yeah it’s fucked up but I can’t help but find it hilarious.
shareNow all we have to do is get the liberal University I work for to understand this along with the students
sharelol the liberal university I attended emails me all the time asking for handouts and I tell them to go fuck themselves every time.
shareWhat kind of a business model is it that universities employ? They continually raise prices in a manner that far outstrips inflation, but then they badger their former customers for even more money long after they've finished with the service they contracted to provide.
Imagine flying the friendly skies and then for the rest of your life you get regular letters from American Airlines saying, "In order to continue to provide our services we rely on the generosity of valued customers such as yourself. Please consider making a one-time or annual donation to our airline so that we may continue bringing the world to your doorstep!" You'd never bring your custom to any company that showed that much effrontery.
Executive orders aren’t enough. Federal laws need to be passed to protect the country against the cancer that is the Democrat party and their mentally ill cult.
Woke and its supporters should be eradicated from power. The fires in CA are exactly what happens when Democrats are allowed to run things unchecked.
The Democrat party is the enemy of the United States.
>The Democrat party is the enemy of the United States.
Interesting.
They say the same about the Republicans.
Who do we all believe?
Who?
Who? 🤔
If you mean the RINOs, then yes, those are Democrats posing as Republicans.
shareI believe the actions of both parties that I have witnessed. The Democrats are clearly the enemy of the United States.
shareWhich proudly remove and burn the American flag?
shareThat's what I like to hear. We need more people like you to think this way. Make your voice heard and spread the message far and wide — if enough people speak up, maybe we can finally eradicate wokeness. What we need is an old-school-style fascism, but this time, instead of Jews, the target should be the Wokes. They are the undesirables of our time. But instead of yellow Stars of David, they will don rainbow triangles — and the irony is they already wear them proudly, making them easy to identify.
shareBut we still have to deal with men and women pretending to be part of the opposite gender.
shareWe still have to deal with dawn and dusk. That doesn’t require everyone to walk around pretending there’s no night and day
shareThe best course of action is to employ social pressure, ridicule, humiliation, bullying, and even intimidation to compel them back into the closet. It is more effective than passing laws.
shareCry about THAT, snowflakes!
> All that it means is the increased persecution and ignorance against transgender people for the next few years.
No.
It means an end to Libs and companies, terrorizing and crucifying people ln social media like JK Rowling who refuse to support the trans delusions.
Maybe but that does not mean persecution will not now happen the other way. The transphobia on this board shows which way the winds are blowing,.
shareThey never stopped blowing that way.
Personally, I don’t care what they do.
Glue a horn to your head and pretend you’re a unicorn if you want.
Just don’t expect or demand the entire world to accept your delusion and support it or threaten to punish those who don’t.
And stop fucking trying to push confused kids into doing it.
Keep it out of the schools.
Let kids decide when they’re 18 what they want to do and stop grooming them before that.
Perfectly said. It’s so creepy how the likes of Flimflam insist on having this ‘trans’ insanity rubbed in people’s faces and used to psychologically damage and permanently mutilate children.
The fuck is wrong with these people?
Thank you for your demands,
Let kids decide when they’re 18 what they want to do
I'm not crying but I'm a liberal so you probably are referring to me with your taunting. The reason I'm not crying is because you know that despite what you claim--
"People can be born with variations in sex characteristics that don't fit the typical binary definitions of male or female. This can occur due to variations in chromosomes, hormones, or the development of reproductive organs, leading to individuals who are intersex."
This tiny percentage of "abnormal" people really jerks your chain and fills you with hate, for some reason. Were you abused as a child? What accounts for your sociopathy now? You might want to try seeing a therapist who can help you get past your anger and paranoid fantasies (truly they can help!).
Are you so retarded that you don't know mentally disordered biological males are violating women's only spaces like restrooms and changing areas as well as taking over 900 sports medals from women?
share[deleted]
>. Were you abused as a child?
According to the left, a grown man waving his dick in a 5 year olds face is considered educational.
"People can be born with variations in sex characteristics that don't fit the typical binary definitions of male or female. This can occur due to variations in chromosomes, hormones, or the development of reproductive organs, leading to individuals who are intersex."
It looks like you're still making posts on this topic. Are you ready to answer my question yet?
shareWhy is it that every time a pro-trans person brings up "intersex", thinking that they've proven something profound, they ALWAYS drop the subject and run away right afterwards (and will likely just do the same thing again in another discussion)?
It's not even just Thaisticks. Nearly every trans activist does this.
I'm not a "trans activist," I just see haters and ask "why you got to hate?"
shareWell whatever you want to call yourself, you brought up intersex into the conversation. So are you going to answer my question about it? If not, then why? Why do you people always bring it up, then go quiet about it?
shareDo you even know what your question us? You've just got a case of diarrhea mouth, it seems to me.
shareI only seem that way to you because you're not mature, it seems.
I asked you a perfectly fair question. You said there are people who are intersex; who don't fit the typical definitions of male or female. And I'm asking you what's your point?
Are you trying to prove that there are NOT only two genders? That there are more? Do you consider intersex to be neither male or female, but some kind of THIRD sex?
Well?
trying to prove that there are NOT only two genders?
Thanks for your response, but I've heard it from others before, and the main problem is still the same.
People keep saying that "gender is not the same as sex". But virtually every single person I've ever heard say that typically don't really believe it themselves. Nearly all attempts by genderqueer people to identify as the "man or woman" genders have been a way to pretend the "male or female" sexes.
IE: "A (trans) person who identifies as a woman is female."
And every time there are attempts to distinguish and separate the male and female sexes (like in sports), there's always a fight to smuggle the "women" together with the females.
This is also why the idea of gender "nonbinary" is totally ridiculous. Especially if they won't confirm that intersex is really a "third sex".
But virtually every single person I've ever heard say that typically don't really believe it themselves
Nearly all attempts by genderqueer people to identify as the "man or woman" genders have been a way to pretend the "male or female" sexes.
there's always a fight to smuggle the "women" together with the females.
This is also why the idea of gender "nonbinary" is totally ridiculous.
Especially if they won't confirm that intersex is really a "third sex".
Thank you for second anecdotal opinion.
but 'smuggle in' implies something underhand, which it is not.
The problem is more that men who identify as women in sport will always have advantage of greater strength.
Please see my earlier post re intersex.
Men identify as women.
I still have my disagreements and counterarguments, but I'll need to ask you this before I proceed with them.
Are you okay with continuing this conversation with me? If you have a transgender child whom you're protective of, I'll understand if debating about transgenders won't be comfortable for you.
I might need to ask a few questions about your child as well.
I appreciate the ask but as long as you don't make it personal, attack me on the basis of my family, that is fine. You will also have to accept that what I say is more likely to be based on first hand experience. I don't claim to be an expert in this area, but am familiar with what my son and health professionals have diagnosed and said. I also know he is much happier now and is not 'pretending'.
shareThank you.
So about your trans child, when you called him your son, does that mean he was born female, but identifies as a boy/man?
Does your son acknowledge his sex at birth, and accepts that he cannot change it (just like you said)?
How does he define boy/man?
So about your trans child, when you called him your son, does that mean he was born female, but identifies as a boy/man?
Does your son acknowledge his sex at birth, and accepts that he cannot change it (just like you said)? How does he define boy/man?
To be honest we have never had that discussion, but I have no reason to think he denies sex is immutable rather than gender.
Thank you for your advice. But as you say, it is from someone who has never had transchildren, which places you at a disadvantage. Whether or not my son agrees sex is immutable is probably more of technical interest to you than for someone who just wishes to make sense of their live and move on. The bottom line is that he is quite obviously happier and more adjusted since transitioning, and that is all that matters. Knowing him as I do, the idea that he is somehow 'hiding the truth' or 'pretending' frankly tells more about you than it does him.
What rights trans people have over other people,
And they believe that the existence of intersex people helps them do that, by providing a lot of fallacies they could take advantage of.
If you and your son are going to move forward with his transition,
the idea that he is somehow 'hiding the truth' or 'pretending' frankly tells more about you than it does him.
The problem is you are making all these arguments and claims from the outside without experiencing gender dysphoria and how it can affect people.
I don't know for certain but I expect you might have similar views about homosexuality as well.
Despite your views, intersex exists. But is not relevant to my son. Intersex is a natural variation, and not a disease or condition.
Already done, with the assistance of medication and surgery. But thank you. He's having a great life and in fact was married last year.
What does that tell about me?
I find it peculiar that you seem uncomfortable with the term "pretending", but you seem okay with "men identify as women" or vice versa.
the problem is gender and sex are a universal topic that nobody should be outside of, but some people are changing the facts about, with tons of misinformation in them, and somebody has to point them out.
What views have I stated that could be applied to homosexuality?
That's a strawman. I never denied intersex exists, and I don't believe you genuinely thought I did.
I hope he stays happy and won't have any regrets. I really do.
Sorry, but for someone who has a trans relative and thus should be on the inside of all of this, I'm surprised how unaware you are of the fallacies and misinformation that go on in the trans community at large.
Don't you know that they would never stand to allow people to say "women identify as men"? They believe that trans men are real men, and that your son was NEVER female in any capacity, inside or out, beginning to end.
Don't you know the reason why they always bring up intersex in debates all the time? The things they try to prove with it?
Also, every view you think I might have regarding homosexuals is not true. I don't see misinformation coming from them, or fighting over jobs and spaces for the opposite sex or any right 'over' other people. They largely follow the same rules and knowledge as other people, provided that their personal lives are not interfered with.
Most of the homosexuals I see that are exceptions are the ones who speak for transgenders.
I'm surprised how unaware you are of the fallacies and misinformation that go on in the trans community at large.
Thanks for sharing information about your son. I know it's not easy as a parent, so I appreciate it. I don't think I'll ask anymore questions about your family. But are you still interested in resuming the original topic that was at hand before you brought up your son?
My argument was that gender is being used to identify as a sex that a trans person is NOT. Just like that sports example I cited earlier, which even you did not deny. I don't really know why you wouldn't call it "pretending", but "men identify as women" is still what it sounds like.
I want to get back to the technical issues around labels and definitions that occupy us all, because like I said, those are a universal topic that nobody should be outside of. It's about how gender and sex work for everybody, including ME. So I hope this time you won't dismiss me as an outsider who can't even talk about how the rules work on myself.
No problem.
My argument was that gender is being used to identify as a sex that a trans person is NOT.
I'll make the point of my argument more clear. GENDER IS FUTILE.
I know you don't like the word "pretend", but I don't think I can get my point across without it, so please bear with it. Gender is either your sex, or it's your "pretend sex". Either way, it's futile.
If you don't agree with me, then what value and validity do you think gender has?
I'll make the point of my argument more clear. GENDER IS FUTILE. Gender is either your sex, or it's your "pretend sex".
what value and validity do you think gender has?
Gender is not the same as sex, and the difference has been explained already.But it is, for ideological grounds, convenient to deny it exists I can see that.
Validity of gender refers to the extent to which the concept of gender, as a social construct, accurately reflects a person's internal sense of their own gender identity ( male, female, non-binary, or somewhere on a spectrum) It is considered a valid and real experience by the scientific community,
Gender is of value because it can affect a person's power, privilege, and opportunities in a society. It can also impact a person's sense of identity, rights, and possibilities.
Gender is male or female (AKA sexes)
Existence of the internal sense or experience does not mean it's valid or real.
So it has no value unless it is given one.
Gender is not the same as sex although the two can be associated. You can look this up if you don't believe me.
Thank you for your opinion. You have a sense or experience of your own sexuality, one would assume. Does that mean it is not valid or real?
This is true of most things, The bottom line here appears to be that one ought to take your scepticism and assume it is the only correct view. i.e. you give it overweening value.
I looked it up and heard it a thousand times
YOU have not proven to me there is another reason to change one's gender
... which one is valid and real. The sense and experience, or the one that matches with reality.
you're just relying on ad hominems now.
Good; then by now you ought to know that you are wrong about sex and gender being the same. One can have a birth sex and identify with a different gender, as many do.
Many people with gender dysphoria have a strong, lasting desire to live a life that "matches" or expresses their gender identity. They do this by changing the way they look and behave. Proof of gender dysphoria can include a person's history, a medical report, and evidence of distress over time.
You mean the 'reality' you prefer as a conservative commentator, and not the reality others experience.
You didn't say whether, assuming you have an internal sense or experience of your own sexuality, that means it is not valid or real. I wonder why? If it is, then there is no logical reason to deny such certainty in others.
Not at all, I am just pointing out how presumptive you are in assuming your view of sex and gender is the only reasonable one and those who do not share that view are somehow 'pretending' or now even it seems, 'liars'. Ad hominems indeed
Nothing you said denies what I said.
I'm not conservative
here is no PREFERRED reality. There is only objective material reality, and whether or not experience matches with that.
"Sexuality" is an umbrella term that includes many ideas and concepts.
I want to focus strictly on gender identity.
Yes, it is an ad hominem
This time, answer the skinny vs obese analogy I provided.
Not even where I have told you that sex and gender are not the same, and why?
And the reality is that some people feel out of place in their original gender
This agreed separation implies you now consider it separate from sexual identity. Good idea.
If you think that you are insulted by being told you make assertions and think them necessarily true over the experience of others - whom you now call 'liars' just because you don't agree with them - then you need to get out more.
Internalized weight bias exists, and is often when someone internalizes negative stereotypes about their weight and devalues themselves, or suffers distress as a result. The answer can be a transition in weight through diet. In this sense all dieting (or weight loss surgery) is a form of transition. Glad to help.
This time, answer the thrice-asked question of whether, assuming you have an internal sense or experience of your own sexuality, that means it is not valid or real as you claim for others. Is there a problem?
Read what I said. Anybody ever point out to you that you have a habit of avoiding important parts?
And do those feelings match with reality?
Still waiting for you to answer my previous question about this one.
They're men who identify as women, and women who identify as men. They're people who identify as something they are not.
Read my analogy again.
another attempt at a strawman
My internal sense or experience of gender identity (not sexuality, GENDER IDENTITY) does not matter.
a false dilemma and strawman.
I have, thank you; it still consists of just your somewhat conservative opinions together with a conflation of sex and gender.
Which question was that?
Thank you for your expected opinion but, as explained before, while sex is unchanging, gender is not, your preferences notwithstanding. Sorry about that.
Good; so we can both agree that internalised weight exists and is valid and real then, right?
That is something of an evasion since I was asking if it "was not valid or real", as this is something you claim of the experience of others, and not whether it matters (to you). Please try again.
It is not a strawman
do you claim something as valid and real for yourself which you deny others?
you would have recognized it as a question instead of an opinion.
Why do they call male/female "genders" at all? Why do they need genders to have the same names as sexes? If genders and sexes are different as you say, why not give genders any other name, except male or female?
Answer the question.
When someone accused you for using a strawman, and you don't deny it, that's your cue to stop using it, and address the actual analogy they gave you.
(of asking if it "was not valid or real", as this is something you claim of the experience of others, and not whether it matters). I gave my answer
What matters is OBJECTIVE MATERIAL REALITY. That is what gives ANYTHING validity. If I identify as male, then the reality of me being male is what makes it valid.
If anybody else identifies as male, being male makes it valid.
"people keep saying that "gender is not the same as sex" But virtually every single person I've ever heard say that typically don't really believe it themselves. Nearly all attempts by genderqueer people to identify as the "man or woman" genders have been a way to pretend the "male or female" sexes."? I see.
There are many gender identities and names, including non-binary, genderqueer, agender, and bigender. (Most people are born cisgender.) Here your question betrays an unfortunate lack of understanding about gender distinctions.
lol Which one this time? But no matter, I am leaving you to it after this. We have already agreed that one can have an accurate body weight and an internalized body weight.................
The analogy you gave was about the supposedly comparable idea of internalised weight and I gave my answer already.
'objective reality' is that many have gender dysphoria, and medicine takes this as, objectively, perfectly valid and true in itself.
one can change one's gender but not one's sex, since objectively, they can be considered separately and one is immutable, the other not.
I should not have to keep repeating this - and won't anymore since I feel you are just being obtuse.
I've ever heard say that typically don't really believe it themselves. Well, it's true
Why do they call male/female "genders" at all? Why not call THOSE two "genders" something else, instead of male and female?
I internalize being obese. AM I OBESE? Yes or no?
"opinions", as you seem to like to call most things
And the 'objective reality' is that some people do not relate to their gender.
The 'objective reality" is that some people have dreams. They have confusions. Delusions. Pretentions. And lies.
If a man identifies as a woman, is that TRUE?
By the same logic then, identifying as female does not validate being male. See how it works?
With this you have moved on from asserting that trans gendering, and gender dysphoria as a medical condition does not reflect an 'objective reality' of sex at least, to grievously insulting or discrediting the individuals usually concerned with transitioning gender. With your oft-repeated, mere opinions, familiar in the exchange between us it appears that, ultimately, it is all you have to legitimise your view - and is unfortunate.
Yes; it is true that he sincerely identifies as woman. His sex is still male, but it is true that his gender is reassigned.
Thank you for playing.
It's being male that does not validate identifying as female. But it does validate identifying as male... people who have these experiences exist. Not that these experiences are valid.
But IS he a woman, just because he called himself one?
Why they have genders named after sexes. Why they have genders called "man" and "woman"
Your attempts to feign cockiness only reveals your insecurities
Thank you for your purely anecdotal evidence. To which I can just easily point (through personal experience, my inevitable exposure to transgender culture) to people who honestly do believe it.
The word "gender" originally meant "type" or "kind" in Latin and French, but evolved to encompass social, cultural, and psychological aspects beyond biological sex, including gender identity and expression. I hope that helps.
I helpfully listed a range of different genders for your information a while back.
body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), where they are preoccupied with perceived flaws in their appearance, leading to anxiety and distress. In some cases a skinny person may still think they are too fat for instance and develop an eating disorder. They need to transition to a more positive body image before being cured. But, good try.
Delusional people do exist.
explain why they absolutely MUST have two genders that share the same names as biological sexes.
And what kind of body do you think an already skinny person who still thinks he's too fat needs to transition into to be cured?It would be a mental transition from one body image to another.
Is it not possible that this person's internalization of being fat is just... not valid? That it's just a symptom of a DISORDER?
YOUR personal experience ... I don't doubt that some people honestly do believe their own BS.
Gender is a social convention which are validated through a combination of social influence, shared expectations, and the potential for sanctions (both positive and negative), reinforcing behaviours that align with the group's understanding of acceptable conduct. And if I may say so, it is presumptive to think you can decide whose experiences are 'valid' or not.
I can't be bothered to type the answer out all over again. Please see my other reply to you today.
Whatever. But transgender people can be insecure and your lack of empathy and medical knowledge do them no favours.
Everything you just said can also be applied to dreams, confusions, delusions, pretentions, and lies.
You can validate ALL of those things with social influence, reinforcing behaviors that align to groups, and every other way you listed.But only you are always associating lies, delusions, and confusions etc with gender assignment, your implication here. One can also validate truths, clear headedness, aspirations and mental health.
I don't decide whose experiences are "valid". Reality does.. reality will still decide if I'm right or wrong.
please see what I said about your reply above.
Either your medical knowledge is too indefensible, or it's your evasive way of defending it
When transgenders change their gender they simple move to another of those conventional names for that new gender thereby so then having one sex, another gender.
They might as well call the genders 'ladies' and 'gentlemen' 'masculine' 'feminine' or even A and B.
How can there be a symptom of something which is not valid?
With this type of sentiment, despite what you claimed, totally lacking empathy for some very troubled and confused people dismissing all their troubles as 'invalid' as you did earlier.
But only you are always associating lies, delusions, and confusions etc with gender assignment, your implication here.
One can also validate truths, clear headedness, aspirations and mental health.
while sex in immutable, gender is a matter of convention and can be changed.
And my answer remains the same. There is a whole range of possible genders. Male and female are just the two most common.
Since I merely tell you honestly the current view of medical professionals, the matter of indefensibility is something you need to take up with the doctors; this while explaining things to you bluntly and openly, several times in fact, is hardly 'evasive'.
I rather enjoy watching when woke culture gets torpedoed. After years of abuse, justice is finally getting served.
shareWho's been abused (Some have been DISabused of the Male-female only dipole.)?
shareThere is only male and female — binary. Just because there are deformities, genetic mistakes and anomalies, like intersex conditions, which are biological abominations, does not change the fact that the dipole of male and female is the correct and natural order.
shareIt must be very soothing to you to be part of the "correct and natural order," but it only takes a little bit of sympathy to accept other's differences--have you not that little bit of sympathy? I am sorry for you if you don't.
sharehave you not that little bit of sympathy?
Justice is finally coming for the woke scum that has been gaslighting and marginalizing us for the last 10 years.
shareLet’s just pray they get it out of Hollywood. It would be nice to be able to enjoy movies again..
shareThat is what I want more than anything — to see all the diversity garbage removed from TV and film. I want to see TV and film made for White people by White people with White people.
shareI’d be happy with a return to the 90’s - predominantly straight white male heroes and protagonists with a smattering of diversity here and there, and females largely in love interest roles and happy to get their tits out on occasion.
Is that too much to ask for?
That sounds like a reasonable compromise. Perhaps something closer to the '80s would help limit the amount of diversity, though I still believe the '90s were the best era for film. Even the movies that included diversity were excellent. In fact, my favorite film of all time, The Shawshank Redemption, beautifully portrays the friendship between a Black man and a White man.
shareCan they also bring back shy, nerdy, straight, teenage kids that go on fun, sci-fi or fantasy adventures too? I miss those so much.
I also want straight romance back on screen, with both characters being the same ethnicity (I don't mind if they're not always white), and cute little side stories of secondary characters finding hetero romantic love in the background too.
Yeah that sounds good.
I’d like to see raunchy comedies come back too, like Bachelor Party (1984). Guys who want pussy having drunken fun and getting into crazy scrapes, with a good helping of gratuitous tits and bush on the side.
Yeah! :D I want a movie that will make me laugh again. And I want [traditional] family comedies too, like families going on adventures they totally didn't ask for, and hilarity ensues; or families having to deal with something whacky going on in their neighborhood, or tapping into a holiday nobody's touched on yet and having the families go nuts for that, or two really weird, silly, crazy families coming together because the parents or the adult kids (who are straight) are getting married; something along those lines.
God knows, we could use some humor after 9 years of humorless garbage.
When I was younger, many guys would dismiss those kinds of romance movies as 'chick flicks,' but I always found them charming in their simplicity. Like you, I miss those classic romances that portrayed a normal, straight White couple falling in love. I used to watch them with my girlfriend, and I truly cherished those moments.
share“get transgender out of the military and out of our elementary schools and middle schools and high schools.”
I'm no fan of transgenderism, but if this is true, I can't agree to it. Unless trans women are taking jobs meant for women, all people who can do the job without problems have the right to jobs. And unless they're going into bathrooms of the opposite sex, all children have the right to school.
Anne Fausto-Sterling s suggestion that the prevalence of intersex might be as high as 1.7% has attracted wide attention in both the scholarly press and the popular media. Many reviewers are not aware that this figure includes conditions which most clinicians do not recognize as intersex, such as Klinefelter syndrome, Turner syndrome, and late-onset adrenal hyperplasia. If the term intersex is to retain any meaning, the term should be restricted to those conditions in which chromosomal sex is inconsistent with phenotypic sex, or in which the phenotype is not classifiable as either male or female. Applying this more precise definition, the true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%, almost 100 times lower than Fausto-Sterling s estimate of 1.7%.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
So, if there are 335 million people in USA, and 0.018% of them are undeniably hermaphrodites, that comes out to 60,300 Americans with both a penis and a vagina.