So a second Hurricane which will be considered major prior to landfall is going to strike IMMEDIATELY after Florida dealt with a Category 4 Hurricane? Coincidence? I think not. Kamala and her team is clearly trying to decimate Florida with this historic disaster and distract the people from voting for Trump.
shareKamala only controls earthquakes. Trump controls hurricanes and blizzards.
shareNo, The dems are lying when they say climate change is man-made. They actually can control the environment to their liking and have everything set in place to do so if they see it necessary.
shareOf course they’re lying. They use geoengineering to change the weather/climate and blame it on the public. They always project their own crimes. Every. Single. Time.
shareIsn't that the fucking point of climate change? If it's man-made, that would mean they're admitting they control the weather, not the other way around. By you denying and saying they're lying, that means these weather phenomena are all natural, DUH! Ya got reverse psychologized.
shareIf it's man-made, that would mean they're admitting they control the weather
Weather and climate describe the same thing—the state of the atmosphere.
shareWhereas weather refers to short-term changes in the atmosphere, climate describes what the weather is like over a long period of time in a specific area.
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/news/weather-vs-climate
I know, it's all fake news and just more Woke.
They created at least three more. (Kirk, Milton and Leslie)
It seems that instead of using riots to kill and destroy, they chose hurricanes, just in time for the election.
You get more entertaining with every post...
shareSource: "I made it up"
shareAre you implying that the establishment is lying? They have openly admitted in the past that they can change/modify/maneuver the weather.
shareSo because we can seed clouds, that must mean that all hurricanes were caused by us?
shareNo, not all. Only the ones that they can use to further their agenda(s) and $500+ Billion is a big one.
The other hurricanes are their cover for the first/previous hurricane.
>The other hurricanes are their cover for the first/previous hurricane.
You have not demonstrated that the "first/previous hurricane" was theirs to start with. Nevermind the absurdity of the idea that somehow making more would function as cover. Provide evidence for this you lying piece of shit.
There's no evidence that we can cause hurricanes. It's complete bullshit.
So now you're backpedaling and contradicting yourself.
First you admit that they can and now you claim there's no evidence that they can.
There's a new sock account that uses similar fallacies, is it yours?
>So now you're backpedaling and contradicting yourself.
How am I contradicting myself?
>First you admit that they can and now you claim there's no evidence that they can.
No. I said there's no evidence that we can cause hurricanes. Clouding seeding efforts don't cause hurricanes.
And I am still waiting for your evidence that this recent hurricane was caused by the US.
>There's a new sock account that uses similar fallacies, is it yours?
No.
They don't need to cause them...just steer them in the right direction, while seeding them.
https://archive.is/QekKH
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1566898/Scientists-a-step-closer-to-steering-hurricanes.html
Is there any evidence that this research ever left the lab, and indeed, any evidence specifically that this latest hurricane in the USA was steered and seeded?
shareI don't recall specifying that it was caused by the US.
The top beneficiary to the mining and land grabs is "BlackRock" and they have global lackeys to do their dirty work.
Provide evidence that this hurricane was caused by Blackrock
sharecan you prove it isnt?
shareNo. I also can't prove that there isn't a teapot orbiting Jupiter, or that invisible fairies inhabit my garden. Should we just assume that something is true because we can't disprove it?
sharejust because you cant see something it doesnt make it untrue. the fed govt is like schrodinger's cat. they tell us there is no cat but then we find out later there was a cat. or vice versa.
what are the odds of 2 back to back hurricanes to hit the same state twice? and right before an election. all the chaos will cause disruptions for counting votes.
>just because you cant see something it doesnt make it untrue. the fed govt is like schrodinger's cat. they tell us there is no cat but then we find out later there was a cat. or vice versa.
And just because we can't see something, or rather, that there's no evidence for it also doesn't give us good reason for it to be true.
>what are the odds of 2 back to back hurricanes to hit the same state twice? and right before an election. all the chaos will cause disruptions for counting votes.
Florida was hit by 3 major hurricanes in about a month (just over) in 2004. Then 2 Hurricanes in 3 months in 2005.
https://x.com/FreyjaTarte/status/1842321776597996023
shareThis isn't evidence. I've already addressed that.
sharehow is that not evidence?
shareIt's from over a decade ago, and he notes that research is experimental and says nothing about creating hurricanes.
shareso you are saying that science does not advance? at the very end it says "hurricanes"
shareModification, not creation.
And again: Any evidence whatsoever that the US government created this hurricane?
Is it your opinion that natural events just do not occur and that whatever happens, the Biden administration caused it?
"Modification, not creation."
can you elaborate on this? how does modification affect the growth of science?
did you watch the video?
I saw it before you post it.
And are you back to behaving like a pathetic little child asking nonsensical questions because you're too stupid to back up any of your utterly baseless claims?
how does seeing the video before I posted it prove that science does not advance? where is your evidence for this?
Yep, back to behaving like a little child.
I continue to await for evidence that the USA caused the hurricane that just hit Florida and the South-East of the USA.
https://x.com/FreyjaTarte/status/1842321776597996023
shareThat's not evidence. That's a guy talking about the potential of tampering with the weather.
Ignoring the plausibility of somehow directing or causing a hurricane - that something could be done, and could be done maliciously is not evidence that it was. Where is your evidence for this?
its a physicist talking about it 9 years ago. he said at the end of the video its possible to form hurricanes. again, this was 9 years ago. you are alleging that science does not advance.
how would I prove the govt fired a laser beam at the sky? it would be like trying to figure out whats inside a black hole.
>its a physicist talking about it 9 years ago. he said at the end of the video its possible to form hurricanes. again, this was 9 years ago. you are alleging that science does not advance.
Right, and that something /COULD/ be done is evidence that it must have been? Is that what you're alleging?
>how would I prove the govt fired a laser beam at the sky? it would be like trying to figure out whats inside a black hole.
So that's my point. You can't. It's just like every other hurricane that Florida gets roughly once a year or so.
yes, it would be like this math equation.
2+N=4
Solve for N
sorry, that black hole reference was too deep for you. lets say I fire a laser beam at the moon and get a response in 2.56 s. how would you prove I transmitted a laser beam?
You have not established in the first place that you have actually fired a laser beam at the moon. I only have your claim that you did. From my perspective I have some person claiming they did.
Why should I take them seriously?
it would be like this math equation.
2+N=4
Solve for N
So back to you just asking nonsense, irrelevant questions to hide the fact that you have fuck all evidence for your utterly baseless claim that the USA caused the hurricane.
sharehow is math nonsense? its the basis for most everything that exists. I guess math doesnt exist because it was invented thousands of years ago? lol
shareNot remotely what I said.
Still waiting for evidence for the claim that the USA caused the hurricane that hit Florida.
https://x.com/FreyjaTarte/status/1842321776597996023
shareThat is not evidence that the Hurricane, this SPECIFIC HURRICANE was deliberately caused, you unbelievable moron.
sharethe physicist said its possible to manipulate the weather and it has been done already. are saying he is lying?
shareHe was called up on that in the clip by the presenter who said "Alleged" - which he agreed. So he had no evidence.
But supposing it had been done, or rather that clouds have been seeded to incite rainfall (and we know they have) - how does this demonstrate that the hurricanes, the SPECIFIC hurricane that we are talking about was deliberately caused?
https://www.reddit.com/r/weather/comments/1fxotdo/map_of_gulfformed_hurricanes_from_1950_2017/#lightbox
Since 1851, a total of 14 hurricanes have formed in the Gulf of Mexico that moved to the east and into Florida.
and now we have 2 in the span of 2 weeks? seems suspicious to me.
>and now we have 2 in the span of 2 weeks? seems suspicious to me.
There were 3 hurricanes in just over a month in Florida in 2004..
>Since 1851, a total of 14 hurricanes have formed in the Gulf of Mexico that moved to the east and into Florida.
So because its rare, that means its impossible?
Also that data is from 1951, not 1851.
>There were 3 hurricanes in just over a month in Florida in 2004..
is there any evidence for this?
why is the data from 1951 irrelevant?
>is there any evidence for this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Florida_hurricanes#2000%E2%80%93present
Charley, Ivan and Jeanne all within a month and a half.
>why is the data from 1951 irrelevant?
It's not. Just noting you added 100 years.
thats not evidence. thats just a random website with no evidence from legitimate sites.
1951 + 100 is 2051. we are still in 2024 I think. unless I blacked out.
>thats not evidence. thats just a random website with no evidence from legitimate sites.
Sorry, are you now claiming that those hurricanes didn't exist?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5_8ISOYkPM (Hurricane Charley)
https://www.weather.gov/mob/ivan (Hurricane Ivan)
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/13969/hurricane-jeanne (Hurricane Jeane)
All of these sites are lying, and these hurricanes didn't exist?
---
Your original post said 1851, you unbelievable pathetic child.
Skav will accept nothing less than a full confession from the masterminds that created/seeded/steered the hurricanes.
And they also need to demonstrate every step they took while on record and all technical documentation must be provided for the public to access.
Oh, and then, there needs to be corroborating witnesses from "credible sources" to authenticate their confession and claims.
After all that, he will jump straight to Step 3. (Why it’s a good thing)
>Skav will accept nothing less than a full confession from the masterminds that created/seeded/steered the hurricanes.
You are assuming that such "masterminds" even exist. You have zero evidence for your claim that this hurricane was caused by anyone.
>After all that, he will jump straight to Step 3. (Why it’s a good thing)
You haven't got past your own step 1 - which is to provide evidence that this hurricane was anything but a natural event.
I continue to note you being a cowardly little bitch and replying to other people, rather than me.
Fuckface.
No assumption is necessary; anyone with a fraction of common sense knows that those people (masterminds) have existed since the beginning of civilization.
shareThat clever people (academics, scientists, intellectuals), or "masterminds" as you appear to put it have existed is not evidence that some "masterminds" specifically collaborating to create a hurricane to smash into the South-East coast of the USA.
"Masterminds" don't all think and do the same thing.
Moron
I find his trolling amusing somedays and his ability to ignore facts and constantly ask for evidence but then reject your evidence. its a well orchestrated scheme that some people fall for. skivvy pretends he has no deductive reasoning.
shareAnd what facts am I ignoring? Name them. You're of course, talking shit and are too stupid to name them.
You are, like other users on here, baselessly claiming that the USA caused the hurricane that hit Florida. Why should that be considered to be true?
What's the deductive reasoning you even refer to here that somehow provides good reason for thinking the USA caused this hurricane? We know that Florida and the SE board of the USA gets hits by hurricanes, and that they do get hit by them in this season on a (usually) yearly basis. What is it that makes this specific hurricane so unique?
shareBack in the early 2000s the eye of TWO hurricanes passed over my small Florida town in a two week period. It's happened before, and may happen again... but what's it prove? Very little.
shareAlthough wind is not visible, the effects of it are.
If and when there’s no plausible explanation as to what caused something to move/shift/fall; "circumstantial evidence" suggests that the invisible wind caused it.
There's zero circumstantial evidence of anything in regards to orbiting teapots and magical fairies.
What "circumstantial evidence" exactly? Yes, Florida and other parts of the world have been hit by consecutive hurricanes before. This is not a novel event.
The emergence and path of this hurricane was well known and documented. You have presented no evidence that it was somehow directed by HAARP.
There's admission going on here lol.
https://x.com/FreyjaTarte/status/1842321776597996023
Yup, they admitted that 9 years ago to the public but they have been doing it for decades; it's documented.
And the denialists are still claiming that it's just a conspiracy theory.
Turn off hardware acceleration if it shows a blank page: https://map.geoengineeringmonitor.org/
This Is Why Hurricane Helene Was Manipulated:
https://x.com/myhiddenvalue/status/1841456277974601763
History Channel, 2009 (how HAARP could modify weather & cause earthquakes)
https://x.com/SamParkerSenate/status/1842623286091588056
Hurricane and tornado control device US Patent: 20030085296 A1
https://zerogeoengineering.com/2017/hurricane-tornado-control-device/
That's not an admission. He's talking about stuff conducted experimentally, in laboratory settings at that point. His claims about monsoons in the 1960s are completely and utterly baseless.
Show us these documents you claim exists.
Why do you bother asking when you're just going to move the goalpost again as you just did.
shareYou claim there's documents that back up your claims.
Put up or shut up, fuckface. You cowardly spineless piece of shit.
So you're trolling as usual.
shareAsking you for evidence is not trolling. Clearly, as usual, you have fucking nothing and are just making shit up.
shareYes, it's 100% trolling.
Asking is what you did the first 100 times you harassed others on this forum with your incessant demand for evidence; after that, it's trolling.
What a whiny little pissant you are. I don't give a fuck what you think. Make bullshit claims and I will respond by asking for evidence.
Put me on ignore if it makes you cry.
It's going to be difficult to convince people on the fence to vote Republican if their supporters continue saying things like, "The gub'mint controls the weather."
Before you call me woke or stupid or whatever, know that I loathe and despise the demoncrats. I just don't think anybody human can control the weather.
"allegedly"
https://x.com/FreyjaTarte/status/1842321776597996023
People on the fence are generally the ones that sit home on election night.
Then there's this from 2007...
https://archive.is/QekKH
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1566898/Scientists-a-step-closer-to-steering-hurricanes.html
So you are in fact claiming that these hurricanes were deliberate, despite claims you were not in the other thread.
Also, this is about negating hurricanes - not causing them.
Do you have any evidence whatsoever that this recent hurricane was caused deliberately?
Ffs, MAGA will believe anything.
shareThIs is entertainment!
shareCan you read, dumbass?
"Moshe Alamaro, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), told The Sunday Telegraph of his plans to "paint" the tops of hurricanes black by scattering carbon particles – either soot or black particles from the manufacture of tyres – from aircraft flying above the storms. The particles would absorb heat from the sun, leading to changes in the airflows within the storm. Satellites could also heat the cloud tops by beaming microwaves from space.
"If they're done in the right place at the right time they can affect the strength of the hurricane," Mr Alamaro said.
The theory has so far been tested only in computer simulation by Mr Alamaro's colleague, Ross Hoffman. Mr Alamaro said: "With small changes to this side or that side of the hurricane we can nudge it and change its track. We're starting with computer simulations, then will hopefully experiment on a small weather system."
https://archive.is/QekKH#selection-2171.0-2195.321
Satellites could also heat the cloud tops by beaming microwaves from space.
And they vote...
sharePlease stop saying these far-out things. Its not doing us any favors. If you truly believe weather is controllable you best have better evidence than this.
shareTrust the science...
"Moshe Alamaro, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), told The Sunday Telegraph of his plans to "paint" the tops of hurricanes black by scattering carbon particles – either soot or black particles from the manufacture of tyres – from aircraft flying above the storms. The particles would absorb heat from the sun, leading to changes in the airflows within the storm. Satellites could also heat the cloud tops by beaming microwaves from space.
"If they're done in the right place at the right time they can affect the strength of the hurricane," Mr Alamaro said.
The theory has so far been tested only in computer simulation by Mr Alamaro's colleague, Ross Hoffman. Mr Alamaro said: "With small changes to this side or that side of the hurricane we can nudge it and change its track. We're starting with computer simulations, THEN WILL HOPEFULLY EXPERIMENT ON A SMALL WEATHER SYSTEM."
That kinda makes sense. My idiot brain was picturing someone with a joy-stick making the clouds move lmao.
sharehttps://zerogeoengineering.com/2017/hurricane-tornado-control-device/
Turn off hardware acceleration if it shows a blank page: https://map.geoengineeringmonitor.org/
If tiny microwaves can magically cook your food in a box, then huge microwaves from satellites can heat clouds it's not that difficult to conceptualize.
shareI know standard Maga excuses why they have no proof of anything or why no judges will bring charges over the stolen election is "Democrats control everything"
Democrats control Hollywood
Democrats control Media
Democrats control Silicon Valley
Democrats control Police
Democrats control Courts
Democrats control FBI
Democrats control AI
Democrats control CIA
and now the weather? The Fucking Weather!!!???
You retards are beyond hope
This really is rubber wall paranoid lunatic territory.
and yets theres millions of them , all corralled by Trump to vote for him .
History will look back in disbelief at this in decades to come.
They'll be like "Remember when the lunatics nearly took over the asylum?"
Its an overused cliche but now this new insanity really does bring it a step closer
"Ideocracy the movie is coming true"
You. Fucking . Morons.
its about as dumb as dems believing that Russia hijacked the 2016 election with fake facebook ads. lol
Chad - "but muh twitter told me to vote for Trump so I did." haha
Once again , nobody thinks that Russia hijacked the 2016 election.
Your little youtube video of nancy quotes is meaningless and out of context.
You need a larger sample size like , say moviechat site
How many Dems claim 2016 rigged - 0%
How many Magas claim 2020 rigged - 100%
And lets not get off topic here - you believe that Dems control the weather :) ! :D
It must take some effort to be this dumb.
A real conscious ability to ignore reality and live in la la land
Nancy said it was hijacked. and Joe was right about the chicanery in 2020. now the DOJ is saying that China, Iran and Russia will be hijacking the 2024 election. Joe said that Netanyahu might hijack the election too.
shareThose countries will be attempting to get Trump in for you* , probably by spreading propaganda and misinformation about KH . That doesent mean they will , or ever have in the past , succeed
*why? because those enemy countries know that having an easily manipulable moron with mental problems will benefit them and not the US , I dont know why you're assisting them by voting trump.
I am voting Trump, so I can say that Trump won for the next 4 years. lol but unfortunately the election will be hijacked and Joe or Kamelturd will win.
share[–] moviechatterer (15128) 4 hours ago
I know standard Maga excuses why they have no proof of anything or why no judges will bring charges over the stolen election is "Democrats control everything"
Democrats control Hollywood
Democrats control Media
Democrats control Silicon Valley
Democrats control Police
Democrats control Courts
Democrats control FBI
Democrats control AI
Democrats control CIA
and now the weather? The Fucking Weather!!!???
You retards are beyond hope
This really is rubber wall paranoid lunatic territory.
and yets theres millions of them , all corralled by Trump to vote for him .
History will look back in disbelief at this in decades to come.
They'll be like "Remember when the lunatics nearly took over the asylum?"
Its an overused cliche but now this new insanity really does bring it a step closer
"Ideocracy the movie is coming true"
You. Fucking . Morons."
It's no more absurd then the Democrats claiming Trump is an Existential Threat: The man who Hosted The APPRENTICE for Christ sake.. 🙄
Its not the same ballpark , its not even the same sport.
"claiming Trump is an Existential Threat:" is at least maybe credible , maybe absurd - its a grey area lets say given that:
The man refused to gtfo the whitehouse when he lost last time.
The man is a mentaly deficient moron with a narcissus complex
Claiming Dems control the weather however is absolute wack a doodle batshit nonsense
I cant even begin to articulate how amazingly mind bogglingly stupid that idea even is.
I'm surprised you're clinging to it .
Is this a new maga fantasy you all have to believe or you're not allowed any kool aid?
I'm just saying it to get on your nerves and personally don't give a fuck. I'm still voting for Trump in 28 Days
shareah that 'splains it 👍
I'm sure when Trump moves on, someone else will take the MAGA mantle up after him. Perhaps Vance? The guy who seems more optimistic about Project 2025 than even Trump. The MAGA movement will never truly die or slow down that much just because Trump is no longer their leader.
shareYeah, but it's making Harris and Biden look bad concocting another Hurricane when they failed to respond in a timely manner with FEMA for Helena
shareThat's too logical for MAGA to understand, how dare you!
shareanother hurricane mysteriously formed in the gulf. imagine that. dems are doing everything they can to create chaos so they can rig the elections.
shareHave you seen the leftards online that are happy that Trump Supporters are dying?
share1. Deny Climate Change
2. Believe in God and everything happens because of God willing it
3. Combine the two
4. Conclusion: Blame Demonkrats and magical weather machines
Them logic.
1. No one denies the climate changes
2. God is Real. Christ is King.
3. Get Underpants.
4. Conclusion: You're a Russian Tard
Them Logic.