Trump: "I have concepts of a plan"
🤣
--Michael D. Clarke
To be fair, Kamala is probably thinking the same thing to herself right now.
share
MovieChat Forums > Politics > Trump: "I have concepts of a plan"
If he said anything specific and later had to make changes to the plan, the establishment would have used it against him and the liberal retards would be drinking their Kool-Aid.
shareKamala answering any questions: "..."
shareHe said if he can do it better, he will.
Don't people want better?
Oh, he's going to do everything the best. The best any country has ever done it.
He just won't tell us how, that's all. That's a secret.
You think he or Harris devise their policies all by their lonesome?
Maybe RFK Jr will be tasked with it.
Don't you want someone to stick it to Eli Lilly and friends at some point?
I did not say they devise policies on their own. That has nothing to do whether Trump can tell the public how he plans to very quickly make the US the best its ever been when it comes to infrastructure, health care, curing diseases like cancer, and anything else he's asked about but can't tell us how at all.
shareHe told you he'd stop the Chinese vehicles from coming in.
Someone I know just came back from Mexico and told me about those Chinese plants - they're a thing.
You want the US car market flooded with cheap China subsidized vehicles?
He told you he'd stop all vehicles coming in . The Chinese barely make any.
He's stopping Honda , BMW , Merc , Toyota , Missan , Jaguar etc
All the good ones .
You want things made in your country or other countries?
The country of origin means less than the quality. US made cars are mid or less in reliability rankings.
https://www.consumerreports.org/cars/car-reliability-owner-satisfaction/who-makes-the-most-reliable-cars-a7824554938/?srsltid=AfmBOoqFOzdpe5Ycf5_yKrs1yorS3oSM5Wzv3ldfqcQtzfIcpkbrdgfD
So yes, based on reliability reports, I want a car that was made in Japan.
Personally I'd rather see my fellow citizens build things.
You want to be a consumer based society, get ready for some hardship.
If my neighbors want my business then they shouldn't be selling inferior products. If performance and reliability were equal I'd choose domestic. But they aren't, and I don't perceive a vehicle purchase to be an act of charity.
shareSo if China floods the market with state subsidized cheaper cars and destroys the domestic market, you're cool with that?
If China can produce vehicles that are cheaper and more reliable than US automotive manufacturers, then yes. I have no interest in propping up makers that are either unwilling or unable to offer competitive products.
Forcing a population to resort to purchasing poor products, thereby removing incentives for domestic makers to improve their vehicles and make them actually worth buying, is not the answer.
So you have no problem with a foreign government destroying another governments industry.
Got it.
I get your point but in the case of cars american ones are laughable gas guzzlers that look they are designed by a 5 year old , time to give up and let the rest of the world do cars , while you concentrate on something you're good at in return.
Also , most global car manufacturers put actual factories in the foreign markets they're selling to , so you'd still have Americans having jobs building the cars , they just wouldnt be building monster trucks or taxis with V8s gettign 8mpg
I realise of course that the above is not a serious suggestion as getting rid of F350 size dually monsters would be almost as hard as banning guns
Don't forget about the likes of Dodge Chargers where the car is basically scrap at 150,000 miles and has beaten the odds if it somehow manages to last to 200,000. Meanwhile your neighbor has 300,000 on their 15 year old Lexus that they still drive daily without issues.
shareAgain, I don't make financial decisions based on charity.
I do think it's ironic you're claiming that such an outlook is going to destroy the US in this particular context. Are you aware that domestic makers are already importing parts from China and Mexico, assembling them in the US and then slapping a "Made in the US" label in part to lure buyers who think with their feelings rather than their wallets? How much of your good intention here would actually support your stated goals?
https://www.classaction.org/news/general-motors-falsely-claims-acdelco-parts-are-made-in-the-u.s.a.-class-action-alleges
As I said before, if the products and prices were equal I'd support purchasing domestically. But they aren't. If the US had an automotive equivalent of Snap On, I'd gladly pay more for higher quality products and take satisfaction in supporting domestic production. But they don't.
No details and specifics are necessary, otherwise when changes need to be made or the establishment blocks him, they will use it against him as they have done numerous times.
shareThis was about US healthcare policy. I love how you'll make excuses for basically anything Trump says. He's so utterly pathetic according to you that he can't articulate anything in any detail to the US public incase muh establishment somehow uses it against him.
shareThe only reason the Dems and Libs care about specifics is to use it against him as you just demonstrated.
Thanks for proving my point … again.
...What the fuck are you talking about? I've seen plenty of MAGA or conservatives complaining that Kamala doesn't provide any policy plans.
Why is it any different for Democrats to expect some level of detail or planning from Trump?
Because of all the lying and deceptive fact checkers that twist and distort everything that Trump says; therefore, why the hell should he provide specifics and details so they can sabotage his plans as they have been doing for eight years.
Trump always had plans, the Democrats don't because they don't give a shit as long they are financially profiting and remain in power/control. Even the most simple minded can see that.
>Because of all the lying and deceptive fact checkers that twist and distort everything that Trump says; therefore, why the hell should he provide specifics and details so they can sabotage his plans as they have been doing for eight years.
Sorry don't you, as a prospective Trump voter want to know some details about Trumps policy platform? Are you that credulous that you don't care?
Trump is speaking to the US public, not just the media.
Imagine being such a whiny little bitch, as you depict Trump as being, that he is too much of a scared little princess to reveal any details of his platform incase the media are mean about it to him.
What a cowardly little bitch you portray Donald Trump as. And what a simple-minded credulous little buffoon you are for not caring about anything Trump says.
The details are better after the fact since they can be changed numerous times due to different obstacles and setbacks.
I provided two links on another post with a list of all his accomplishments, not that it's necessary since personally I and everyone I know were better off under Trump; the details beforehand were not necessary, only the reality of the results.
BTW, I noticed how you continue to label him "a little bitch" which is ironic considering that on the other hand, your side bitches about how authoritarian he is and the fear mongering of him being a dictator.
100% projection and hypocrisy.
>The details are better after the fact since they can be changed numerous times due to different obstacles and setbacks.
So why not just provide a roadmap of his plans accepting that things might change down the line?
>I provided two links on another post with a list of all his accomplishments, not that it's necessary since personally I and everyone I know were better off under Trump; the details beforehand were not necessary, only the reality of the results.
That's got nothing to do with whatever his future plans are.
>BTW, I noticed how you continue to label him "a little bitch" which is ironic considering that on the other hand, your side bitches about how authoritarian he is and the fear mongering of him being a dictator.
The two terms are not mutually exclusive at all. Most dictators are thin-skinned snowflakes who can't tolerate criticism. Although I would label him more a would-be autocrat than a dictator per se.
He's been saying that for 9 years, though, and still has no plan. He doesn't spend any time thinking of policy.
shareThat sounds like a line from a Will Ferrell comedy. Except it is the Republican nominee for president. Good luck, MAGA!
shareYep, he had his term and under Biden and still hasn't had a comprehensive plan to replace Medicare, pretty much a non-answer.
shareIt’s a start.
share