MovieChat Forums > Politics > A Moment of Clarity on Race and the Impa...

A Moment of Clarity on Race and the Impact on White Identity

posted 6 months ago by curiousMInd101 (4675)
93 replies | jump to latest

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1830290669128089600/pu/vid/avc1/1024x576/vPtUL1p3yD_wbuch.mp4?tag=12
A man has a moment of clarity and discusses how White people are the only group that can't stand up for their own interests without being labeled 'racist.' He explains how this term was purposely created to weaken Whites and keep them from defending themselves.

"Well, to me, racism is just instinct and everything. Everyone is racist, right? Everyone knows this too. Asians are some of the most racist people in the world, but they're not pulled up for it by some moral authority masquerading as a journalism or government official. So racism, to me, is simply wanting the same rights. It's not rooted in hatred. It's not an ugly thing rooted in hatred. It's wanting the same rights that every other race seems to have, which is the right to our own exclusive living space, our own ethnic communities, having our own schools for our own children, having our own government for our own people, looking out for our ethnic interests, protecting us from exploitation, from big business and other hostile forces in the world, not everyone's your friend in this world, not everyone is equal, and not everyone is your friend. People are trying to harm you. People are trying to take advantage of you. People are trying to you know, they're trying to exploit you. That's just the reality of situation, reality of life. And so, you know, to me, racism God or racialism essentially mean the same thing, and it's not an ugly thing. I've thought about what racism is. I'm not just subscribing to some contrived idea about this ugly boogeyman that was, you know, shoved into my soft head during schooling years or during my education process, and now I'm fighting racism like a good, loyal bootlicker to the system. I've actually thought about it. And, you know, as a white guy myself, I realized that the term racist doesn't really apply to anyone except white people. And when you consider that, when you consider that, then it becomes clear that the term is contrived for a sinister purpose. The accusation is reserved only for white people, and that means it's serving a specific agenda."

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 6 months ago

Turns out the original video was in English not German. I updated the post. And created a transcript of the video.

[–] KiwiJim (1816) 5 months ago

Not that you have too much time on your hands or anything, ay CuriousMinge?

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

It literally took me 5 minutes. I had an AI bot handle it. Just upload the video, and boom—you’ve got a transcript

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

CuriousMinge? That's very rude of you KiwiJim. Very rude indeed.

[–] KiwiJim (1816) 5 months ago

Well you know what they say, if the minge fits..

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

But it doesn't.

[–] KiwiJim (1816) 5 months ago

Are you sure?

Your weak-arsed race baiting appears distinctly minge-worthy from where I’m standing.

Pussy is as pussy does.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

My race-baiting serves a larger purpose.
And don't be a pussy by calling me a pussy, call me cunt, like a real man.

[–] KiwiJim (1816) 5 months ago

Ok cunt :)

Better get back to that larger purpose of masturbating while disparaging other ethnicities in a forgotten corner of the internet. You’re making a difference mingey.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

See, there you go cunt! Doesn't that feel better?

And I will. I'm sitting here naked, wearing only a cock ring, crafting my next racist post as we speak. I'm thinking of sending a picture of a noose to black guy on twitter. I think that will get me to cum.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

I hope I don't ever get famous, because if I do, the above post will almost certainly get me cancelled.
YOLO LULZ

[–] KiwiJim (1816) 5 months ago

🤢🤮

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

LOL

[–] KiwiJim (1816) 5 months ago

Lots of love to you too 😘

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

By the way, here's a pro tip: if you ever sift through all my posts here, you’ll find I almost always sneak in a line from a movie or TV show somewhere in my post. Sometimes it’s blatantly obvious, and everyone will catch the reference, but more often, it’s a bit more subtle.

The above line about the cock ring is a reference to Happy Harry Hardon played by Christian Slater in Pump Up the Volume: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c93wwAJbB1M

[–] KiwiJim (1816) 5 months ago

Whoa, take it easy mingey, there will be no sifting through your posts, I’m just not that invested. But that’s amazing that you quote movies. YOU are amazing. Please let me know how to subscribe to your newsletter.

Mingey for president!!

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Don't be such a cunt about it, I'm just saying be on the look out. It's like an Easter Egg. I'm trying to make it fun for everyone. Fun is what I'm all about.

[–] KiwiJim (1816) 5 months ago

Yeah stating that black women should be kept on leashes is a laugh riot. You’re a regular Carrot Top.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

I know right? That one was banger, no doubt.

[–] KiwiJim (1816) 5 months ago

No doubt at all. I laughed so much I almost shat.

Post more like that. Scum needs to be easily identifiable, if only so the Amerigirls of the forum can flock to it like flies on shit.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Why are you so angry Kiwi? Don't be angry. Be happy.

Never lose your smile

[–] KiwiJim (1816) 5 months ago

What makes you think I’m angry?

I find your fractured psyche quite fascinating actually.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

You sounded a little angry to me. But I'm glad you find my fractured psyche fascinating. It's all part of my charm — keeps people guessing which version they’re talking to. You call it fractured, I call it multidimensional.

[–] B1cKsurN (17838) 6 months ago

White people really need to find a racial identity....and fast. They are less than 10% of the global population.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 6 months ago

I know. It's heartbreaking. It feels like we're facing extinction. It enrages me that some White people are either indifferent or so thoroughly brainwashed and cucked that they cheer on this decline.

People sometimes accuse me of being afraid or angry, but what I truly feel is profound grief. I'm mourning the loss of my people and their homelands. I see a future without us and it looks like an apocalyptic wasteland. I can’t bear the thought of my kids growing up in such a world.

[–] Tam87 (1608) 5 months ago

It enrages me that some White people are either indifferent or so thoroughly brainwashed and cucked that they cheer on this decline.

What I find about whites is that most of them only care about what's going on in their own lives. If they're doing well, nothing else really matters. I don't think they have a concept of a homeland anymore, it's never been drummed into them to feel any kind of racial identity, just the opposite (thanks to film and tv especially).

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

This is it exactly. It's not just that it hasn’t been drummed into them; it’s that it has been deliberately drummed out of them. They’re not allowed to collectivize based on race, celebrate their heritage, or even learn their own history — except to be told they were the villains who need to atone for their ancestors' sins. Their connection to their people, their history, and heritage has been systematiclaly stripped out of them. Now, they're conditioned to be passive, complicit in their own erasure, driving their own extinction.
It's really disgusting.

[–] AmeriGirl26 (15137) 5 months ago

The WEF is trying to get rid of us, because our culture and identity is the only one strong enough to think for ourselves and to fight back against evil authoritarians. We're the only ones who push ourselves to be independent, work hard for what we want, and to use critical thinking. Very few other non-white civilizations have actually done that, and most are far too used to having to just live an almost feudalistic lifestyle of being powerless peasants that have to capitulate to a tiny oligarchy that's in charge.

The cabal's ultimate goal is to be the only group of white people in the world with a bunch of brown and black peasants to do the dirty work without question and not have the gumption to fight back against the regime. It'll be Panem just like in the "Hunger Games" books, but on a global scale. Everyone will be a slave except for one little oligarchy that lives in a walled-off city somewhere in Europe.

[–] Tam87 (1608) 5 months ago

This bit stands out:

as a white guy myself, I realized that the term racist doesn't really apply to anyone except white people. And when you consider that, when you consider that, then it becomes clear that the term is contrived for a sinister purpose. The accusation is reserved only for white people, and that means it's serving a specific agenda

Also, only one race is ever demonized for things done in the past. The word slavery in todays world basically means whites enslaving blacks, and colonialism means whites exploiting third world countries. It's as if genocide, invasion, subjugation and enslavement doesn't count unless whites are doing it. It's pathetic.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Yeah, that part stood out to me as well. Honestly, it kind of gave me chills hearing him say it. It just felt good to hear someone say it out loud.
One day, we’re going to make those responsible pay for the damage they’ve inflicted on our people.

[–] Tam87 (1608) 5 months ago

The ironic thing is that if whites were as racist as they say we are, then non-whites wouldn't even be allowed into our countries and any that got in would be deported.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

That’s exactly what I’m trying to do here — create a space for all the racists. For people who want to speak out but are afraid of being labeled or banned. For those who’ve had the Wokes hammer it into them for the last decade that their views are illegitimate. I want to show them it’s okay, there’s nothing to fear. I want them to see that I’m the biggest racist around, and I wear that proudly, like a badge of honor. That’s why I go so extreme here — to push the Overton window and carve out space for normal people with unpopular views

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

I want them to see that I’m the biggest racist around, and I wear that proudly, like a badge of honor.

But you are not; you pretend; you admitted to me just a short while ago that half the time you are joking. Once the sort of cat is out of the bag, it cannot be caught and readmitted.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Are you certain about that? Take a look at my original post where I mentioned being only half-joking. This was in my response to SemiAnimus. What was I referring to when I said I was only half-joking? I was talking about single-handedly turning this board into a propaganda arm of the Fourth Reich. That was the half-joke. Regarding the racist and White supremacist claims, I’ve already clarified in a previous post that while I enjoy trolling and being provocative, I genuinely believe in a lot of what I say; I just present it in the most raw and extreme manner possible.

Here was the original post where I clarified what I meant:
"As for my positions, I genuinely believe in most of them, though I often present them in an intentionally extreme and provocative way. I also like to troll a little, partly to spark conversation and partly for my own and others' entertainment. While my delivery may be exaggerated for effect, the core beliefs behind them are real."

I told you the line between parody and reality is blurred.

Never lose your smile!

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

What was I referring to when I said I was only half-joking?

Just above in this thread you said "I'm glad you find my fractured psyche fascinating. It's all part of my charm — keeps people guessing which version they’re talking to. ". QED

that while I enjoy trolling and being provocative, I genuinely believe in a lot of what I say

Trouble is we are guessing which part that is. And it is reasonable to think that it would be the most outrageous and extreme.

< partly to spark conversation and partly for my own and others' entertainment.
With the actual results being as already described as, now a self-admitted troll, you hope to provoke and bring the worst out of people.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Just above in this thread you said "I'm glad you find my fractured psyche fascinating. It's all part of my charm — keeps people guessing which version they’re talking to

I thought what you said was funny and I was playing along.

Trouble is we are guessing which part that is. And it is reasonable to think that it would be the most outrageous and extreme.

The line between parody and reality is blurred.

you hope to provoke and bring the worst out of people.

Some would say the best out of people.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

I thought what you said was funny and I was playing along.

Another joke! Well done. But you were not addressing me with that.

The line between parody and reality is blurred.

Not with the right glasses.

" you hope to provoke and bring the worst out of people."
Some would say the best out of people.

No troll writes to bring the best out of people.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

No troll writes to bring the best out of people.

This troll does. I care about people.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

I care about people.

Well the racist whites, anyway (using your new definition here, thanks!)

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

A man has a moment of clarity

Well, that proves things then.

"I'm not just subscribing to some contrived idea"

Unfortunately. this is exactly what he is doing.

"racism is just instinct and everything. Everyone is racist, right? ... racism, to me, is simply wanting the same rights. It's not rooted in hatred."

Racism : a belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race [Websters]

A more balanced and reasonable view, that quite obviously any group can be racist, can be found here:

https://jimcrowmuseum.ferris.edu/question/2009/march.htm

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

That's a very uncharitable interpretation of what the man was saying. You cherry-picked a few words that are irrelevant to his overall message, which was that the term 'racist' is used as a weapon to weaken and silence White people into submission. As a result, they are conditioned to be passive while facilitating their own extinction.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

You cherry-picked a few words that are irrelevant to his overall message

Hardly irrelevant. It is where his justification lies. Racism is not 'wanting the same rights' it is, as Webster says ' a belief that some races are superior'. And that belief is indeed often rooted in hatred. Sometimes from the fear of losing white privilege.

'racist' is used as a weapon to weaken and silence White people into submission. They are conditioned to be passive

Doesn't seem to have silenced him much. Or you. Or the many on this board with the same views, and who aren't in the event joking, in fact.

while facilitating their own extinction.

One of your 'half jokes' The familiar conspiracies which make up Replacement Theory can be funny.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Hardly irrelevant. It is where his justification lies. Racism is not 'wanting the same rights' it is, as Webster says ' a belief that some races are superior'. And that belief is indeed often rooted in hatred. Sometimes in the fear of losing white privilege.

The dictionary is irrelevant in this context. Dictionaries don’t assign meaning to words; they simply document how words are used. Usage is what determines meaning as pointed out by Wittgenstein. As mentioned, the term 'racism' is frequently used to describe White people who merely seek the right to have their own exclusive spaces, ethnic communities, and a government that prioritizes their ethnic interests. Other groups are allowed these privileges without being labeled as racist, yet when White people request the same rights, they are branded as racists.

Doesn't seem to have silenced him much. Or you. Or the many on this board with the same views, in fact.

It has silenced him and many others, but now he’s finally speaking out because people have had enough and are starting to rise up. And that’s exactly what I’m doing here. By being extreme, I’m carving out space for normal people who’ve been too scared to speak out, fearing labels like racist, sexist, or bigot. I’m showing them there’s nothing to fear. I embrace being called the biggest racist, sexist, misogynist, homophobe, and transphobe here, wearing these labels as badges of honor. I don’t care how many Wokes whine about it — they don't matter, their feelings don't matter, their opinions don’t matter. I wanted to create a space where those with "racist" views can express themselves freely, and I’ve succeeded. Now, many people here are discussing race and White identity and expressing their true feelings.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

Dictionaries don’t assign meaning to words;

Still joking I see. A dictionary is a reference book that lists words and their definitions, and provides other information about them.

document how words are used

Linguistics is the social science that studies how language is used in different cultures and contexts.

'racism' is frequently used to describe White people who merely seek the right to have their own exclusive spaces, ethnic communities, and a government that prioritizes their ethnic interests.

According to the Oxford Dictionary this time, racism is 'prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed at someone based on their race, with the belief that one's own race is superior.' The thing is that when those blithe Whites do to 'merely' seek justice and their rights, it is often denied to others on the grounds that Caucasians are necessarily privileged, deserved, and superior.

Other groups are allowed these privileges without being labeled as racist, yet when White people request the same rights, they are branded as racists.

This a claim I have yet to seen proved or even properly evidenced. If we take it seriously one quickly sees that it is not a call for justice but for prejudice, through a fear of losing white privilege.

By being extreme, I’m carving out space for normal people who’ve been too scared to speak out, fearing labels like racist, sexist, or bigot. I’m showing them there’s nothing to fear.

Yeah right. A shame you admit to being half-joking all along, You are not quite the cultural warrior you claim to be. An alternate view is that you are just provoking disgruntled people to bring out their worst.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Still joking I see. A dictionary is a reference book that lists words and their definitions, and provides other information about them.

No, that wasn't a joke. That's simply how words work. They are used in various ways by people, and while dictionaries attempt to document and record these uses, they’re always playing catch-up. Words evolve over time, and dictionaries are always lagging behind.

According to the Oxford Dictionary this time, racism is 'prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed at someone based on their race, with the belief that one's own race is superior.' The thing is that when those blithe Whites do to 'merely' seek justice and their rights, it is often denied to others on the grounds that Caucasians are necessarily privileged, deserved, and superior.

Once again, you’re missing the point. The dictionary definition is irrelevant here. The term 'racism' is being used by some to describe White people who simply want their own exclusive communities. That’s what they mean by 'racist.' The person in the video was addressing this specific usage and definition of racism, not the one provided by Oxford Dictionaries.

This a claim I have yet to seen proved or even properly evidenced. If we take it seriously one quickly sees that it is not a call for justice but for prejudice, through a fear of losing white privilege.

White people deserve to be privileged in their own society. It’s their society, built by White people for White people, while foreigners are merely guests. Do you realize how absurd this 'White privilege' nonsense is? Foreigners aren’t entitled to any privileges. They should be grateful just to be here and receive benefits without contributing anything of value. And yet, you have the audacity to bring up our privilege. I could tell you more about what immigrants deserve but I think it would probably violate the community standards of this board.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

Words evolve over time, and dictionaries are always lagging behind.

This is just a desperate attempt to weaken the clear and similar definitions of racism provided by two major dictionaries. It sounds like special pleading

.The dictionary definition is irrelevant here

It is entirely relevant. All that is happening is that you don't want to accept standard definition and want to use something which your argument demands.

The term 'racism' is being used by some to describe White people who simply want their own exclusive communities.. The person in the video was addressing this specific usage and definition of racism, not the one provided by Oxford Dictionaries..

What has happened is that person has used the word 'racism'. which is invariably seen as a negative thing (although I have seen some here making out of it a positive) and misapplied it to add to their case. Same as I described of you, above.

Do you realize how absurd this 'White privilege' nonsense is?

Not absurd enough, as we saw from the historic quote you provided founding the country with all that white privilege built in.

Foreigners aren’t entitled to any privileges.

Probably another half-joke, so I am laughing. But fully naturalised ethnic groups in the US are no more 'foreigners' than white immigrants. They are just more recent arrivals. Your argument is illogical and self serving.

They should be grateful just to be here and receive benefits without contributing anything of value. Your joking continues I see.

And yet, you have the audacity to bring up our privilege

Seems like you admit it exists here... but again just look again at those terms of the founding of your country, QED

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

as we saw from the historic quote you provided founding the country with all that white privilege built in.

I'm glad it's built in. That is how it should be. Even so, it wasn’t enough to stop us from making the mistake of turning our country into a failed MultiCulti experiment. You seem to be under the impression that there’s something inherently good or desirable about multicultural societies. There isn’t. If you import foreigners into a democracy, it inevitably becomes a tyranny. Aristotle pointed this out 2,300 years ago. You’d think we would have learned from history by now.

Probably another half-joke

If they are non-White they are foreigners.
Ausländer Raus!

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

I'm glad it's built in.

Good; then we both agree it is.

You seem to be under the impression that there’s something inherently good or desirable about multicultural societies. There isn’t.

Your are welcome to your opinions.

If they are non-White they are foreigners.
Ausländer Raus!

.
I'm still half laughing ...

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

It looks like part of your post has been cut off. It looks like you didn't properly close the HTML flag.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

sorry, corrected now..

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

[deleted]

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Oh, and I reject the Woke definition of racism. It’s a cynical construct designed to single out White people and marginalize them. This definition is nothing more than a tool in a vile anti-White propaganda campaign, and it’s disgusting.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

I reject the Woke definition of racism.

Websters is woke too, now? You can see its definition does not mention any ethnic group.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

See my other reply to you. I explain how dictionaries work.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

See how I show how you unfortunately mix up linguistics with dictionaries' widely understood function.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

You’ve done nothing of the sort. I said that "usage is what determines meaning as pointed out by Wittgenstein". This is accurate unless you believe that Wittgenstein's idea — that the meaning of a word comes from its use in a particular language game — is confined solely to linguistics. It isn’t. He was making a broader claim about how language operates in everyday life.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

I said that "usage is what determines meaning as pointed out by Wittgenstein"

Now now be sensible. I don't think he meant that a deliberately false use of a word affects what it really means (although those misusing it might be satisfied to think it does) But, good try.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Language evolves precisely through the misuse of words. Misuse or novel applications of words can eventually become accepted if enough people adopt them, shifting what is considered "correct". This is a key part of how language evolves and semantic change happens over time.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

This is true. However a deliberately false use of a word does not affect what it really means. In the case of racism it is quite obvious that any ethnic group can be racist towards another.

But if it was true that the new meaning of racism is the 'Woke definition' of racism, meaning 'to single out White people and marginalize them'. Then this fresh definition is more than 'just a tool in a vile anti-White propaganda campaign'; it is what racism has become, and so, by the new definition brought into being by your usage, er, most white people are 'racist'. Thank you for showing the way.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

But if it was true that the new meaning of racism is the 'Woke definition' of racism, meaning 'to single out White people and marginalize them'. Then this fresh definition is more than 'just a tool in a vile anti-White propaganda campaign'; it is what racism has become, and so, by the new definition brought into being by your usage, er, most white people are 'racist'. Thank you for showing the way.

It can be both. The definition might be incorrect initially but can evolve to become the 'correct' one over time. Additionally, this shift can be driven by a deliberate anti-White propaganda campaign, influencing how terms are perceived and used.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

he definition might be incorrect initially but can evolve to become the 'correct' one over time.

Well you have used it so that's good enough for me. So then most whites are racist.

Additionally, this shift can be driven by a deliberate anti-White propaganda campaign, influencing how terms are perceived and used.

Ah, The good old Woke-Liberal conspiracy? Of course,

[–] moviechatterer (16326) 5 months ago

White people are the only group that can't stand up for their own interests without being labeled 'racist.'

Thats kinda like saying why isnt the fat kid with the biggest slice of cake allowed to have any more cake?

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Wrong. This is our country; it’s our cake. We deserve the biggest slice because the entire cake belongs to us. We are not obligated to share it with anyone else. We’ve made the mistake of inviting guests and giving them a slice, and now they believe they’re entitled to a larger portion.
The guests have overstayed their welcome and now it's time to go.
Ausländer Raus!

Ah, and before you bring up Black people, let me clarify: they were chattel and were never entitled to any of the cake. We liberated them from bondage, and now they should return to where they came from. They should grateful that they were even allowed to stay.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

The guests have overstayed their welcome and now it's time to go... now they should return to where they came from

Obviously one of your 'half-joking' efforts. But such a thing, even if taken seriously, will prove hard to do with nationalised citizens. And why not send all the whites back to Europe where they came from? The principle is the same.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

But such a thing, even if taken seriously, will prove hard to do with nationalised citizens.

Citizenship can be revoked.

And why not send all the whites back to Europe where they came from? The principle is the same.

Because the country belongs to White Europeans. It was founded by White Europeans for White Europeans. This is clearly stated in the Nationality Act of 1790:
https://immigrationhistory.org/item/1790-nationality-act/
"Congress first defined eligibility for citizenship by naturalization in this law, and limited this important right to “free white persons.” In practice, only white, male property owners could naturalize and acquire the status of citizens, whereas women, nonwhite persons, and indentured servants could not."

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

Citizenship can be revoked.

Not based on the colour of one's skin,

Because the country belongs to White Europeans.

The native Americans were there first, you are an immigrant.

In practice, only white, male property owners could naturalize and acquire the status of citizens, whereas women, nonwhite persons, and indentured servants could not."

This just shows again the white privilege and racism, from the start, of your country. QED

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Not based on the colour of one's skin,

Says who?

The native Americans were there first, you are an immigrant.

The native Americans were savages who couldn't even figure out how to create anything more advanced than a hunter-gatherer society. And we weren't immigrants, we were conquerors. The savages should be grateful that we didn't genocide them all. It was a great act of mercy and compassion that we allow them to live to this day on reservations.

This just shows again the white privilege and racism, from the start, of your country. QEDThis just shows again the white privilege and racism, from the start, of your country. QED

Good. Racism is based.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

"Not based on the colour of one's skin,"
Says who?

Well obviously in a racisr dictatorship, yes, But at the moment no.

The native Americans were savages [blah]And we weren't immigrants, we were conquerors. The savages should be grateful that we didn't genocide them all. It was a great act of mercy and compassion that we allow them to live to this day on reservations.

Your joking continues I see...

Racism is based.

Based on historical fact? Indeed.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

"Not based on the colour of one's skin,"
Says who?

Well obviously - in a racist dictatorship, yes, But at the moment no.

The native Americans were savages [blah]And we weren't immigrants, we were conquerors. The savages should be grateful that we didn't genocide them all. It was a great act of mercy and compassion that we allow them to live to this day on reservations.

Your joking continues I see...

Racism is based.

Based on historical fact? Indeed.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Well obviously in a racisr dictatorship, yes, But at the moment no.

Therefore a racist dictatorship is needed. QED

Your joking continues I see...

Am I joking though? Sometimes it's hard to tell.

Based on historical fact? Indeed.

No just based. Or based as fuck. QED

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

Therefore a racist dictatorship is needed

Another good one. You crack me up.

Am I joking though? Sometimes it's hard to tell.

Don't pride yourself you are that subtle.

No just based. Or based as fuck. QED

No idea what you are on about with this, sorry.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Another good one. You crack me up.

That's what I'm here for.

No idea what you are on about with this, sorry.

Sounds like you're not very based.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

Sounds like you're not very based.

Since I don't know 'based' means in this context, I will adopt my own binding definition, (around your own idea,) deeming it meaning 'fooled by racist notions'. Thank you. See how it works?

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

‘Based’ is a term that comes from the alt-right movement of the early 2010s. Today, it essentially means that you’re seen as cool and 'redpilled,' especially when you express controversial views that challenge the mainstream establishment. When used as a response to someone, it implies they have a sense of authenticity and approval for expressing controversial or unconventional opinions.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

‘Based’ is a term that comes from the alt-right movement of the early 2010s. Today, it essentially means

That was the OLD meaning, duh. I have introduced a new one, as outlined, through my usage. I know it will catch on...

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Now you're just being catty. Meow.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

I have a new definition for 'catty' too. Very flattering it is.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Meerrrrreeeeeowww

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

Hey, I define that as 'I have nothing fresh to say'! It is great how this works, just defining things to suit what one wants and it becomes true.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

I thought you were better than this. You disappoint me.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

Condescension noted. I've got a favourable definition of 'disappoint' too (for me, naturally)... remember, usage changes meanings. You insisted....

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Really? Still beating that dead horse, are we? I've noticed you have quite the fondness for flogging the deceased. Why is that?

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

Thank you for admitting that your Wittgenstein argument was a dead horse.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

I was talking about you making the same joke over and over again. It wasn’t funny the first time, and it’s not going to get any funnier. It’s just cringey.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

It is you who admits to making half-jokes as a practice. But the irony amused me, and certainly still exercises you.

“When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’ [Alice in Wonderland]

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

My jokes are funny though, that's the difference.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

[deleted]

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

Yes I laugh quite a lot! Though probably not for the reasons you hope for.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

You know, I actually liked you at first. It felt like we could disagree, have some back-and-forth, and still maintain a level of mutual respect. But now? Nearly every word you say reeks of this arrogant, pseudo-intellectual smugness, as if you’re more interested in showing off than engaging in a real conversation. The condescension in your tone isn’t clever, it’s just insufferable. It’s honestly repellent.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

Nearly every word you say reeks of this arrogant, pseudo-intellectual smugness, as if you’re more interested in showing off than engaging in a real conversation. The condescension in your tone isn’t clever, it’s just insufferable. It’s honestly repellent.

Thank you for your opinion, and you are welcome to it. But methinks you protest too much.

[–] curiousMInd101 (4675) 5 months ago

Thank you for sharing your opinion. You’re entitled to your own perspective as well. I’m simply echoing what you’ve put out there.

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

Thanks for the projection. If you live in an echo chamber (such as this board is very often) that is easy to do. As for what you put out there, half-joking, race-baiting, the result of a 'fractured psyche' of a troll (as you called yourself), I am pleased that you are happy with how it works out. Until the next time..

[–] filmflaneur (3146) 5 months ago

[deleted]