Who should Republicans choose to replace Trump? - Politics Discussion

[–] JoWilli (19964) 6 months ago

I would be happy with Vivek or Tulsi. Ron would be my last choice.

reply

[–] emori (3661) 6 months ago

Vivek is a russian asset and traitor. Why would you chose him?

He is fake Trump-wannabe minion. He tried to copy Trump but republicans will never chose non-white candidate. They were just like: "Ok boy. Trash democrats and that's it. Know your place".

reply

[–] BKB (9912) 6 months ago

How exactly is this any different than Biden getting Robert Deniro to stand outside a Court house and trash Trump?? 🙄

reply

[–] Yatzo (1924) 6 months ago

Dinero is replacing Biden?

reply

[–] JoWilli (19964) 6 months ago

russian asset? LOL! you guys still sticking to that story?

reply

[–] emori (3661) 6 months ago

Have you been living under the rock? Or in denial?

Did you not see how every radical trumpist on Twiiter and here on site are full on russian biches and root and push for russia to win over Ukraine and USA?

Who do you personally support?

reply

[–] maixiu (2220) 6 months ago

*bawk*...pretty bird...Russia, Russia, Russia...*bawk*

reply

[–] JoWilli (19964) 6 months ago

no one is a russian asset on here or twitter. and no one is rooting for russia to win. I cant speak for anyone else but I want russia to lose this war too. but this war is unwinnable and its a stalemate. russia just keeps on killing innocent civilians and no one really seems to care. the sanctions are pointless as well. it would be best to negotiate a cease fire deal and create a DMZ and call it day, but Biden needs to launder more money to the corrupt country of Ukriane.

reply

[–] emori (3661) 6 months ago

And then you people with completely serious face claim you are not russian assets. While at the same time demanding for Ukraine to surrender and for russia to win. LOL.

Comedy.

Homey - russia owns you. Russia hired Carlson, Jones, Posobitch and those other idiot-bloggers. Or they surrendered willingly because they hate Democrats and think that enemy of their enemy are their friends. So they dream that putin will somehow "end wokeness" in USA if they would kiss ass too much. Or some shit.

And those bloggers brainwash trumpists who read them into submission to russia and to root for it to win. And then trumpists run around internet and repeat it. Like you did now.

At the same time thinking its actually your own thoughts and conclusions. It's sad and pathetic, really. It's embarrassing to be russian little puppets.

Honey there was a cease fire negotiated in 2014. Called Minsk agreements. And then russia used 8 years to prepare more weapons and made full invasion. There can not be any "cease fire negotiations". Because they want to occupy whole Ukraine and then other countries. Any "cease fire" they will use to make more weapons and soldiers. Then attack again. Why are trumpists so empty headed and can't understand it is beyond me.

reply

[–] JoWilli (19964) 6 months ago

ok

reply

[–] CraigC (8177) 6 months ago

Wow, that is incredibly stupid. Typical of liberal "logic". If we're against sending money to Ukraine, we're somehow pro-Russia? Children are usually smarter than this.

No dipshit, we're only sending money and weapons to Ukraine to protect Biden's secrets and corrupt business interests.

reply

[–] emori (3661) 6 months ago

Sure Ivan. Go get your 5 rubles.
It will never be stop funny how pro-russian trumpists run around and trying to convince themselves that they are not traitors and are not owned by russia.
You are embarrassing to your country.

reply

[–] maixiu (2220) 6 months ago

Vladimir Putin never called me a racist, or a homophobe, or a deplorable, or a bitter clinger. How sad is it that he despises tens of millions of Americans less than the leaders of what's left of "our country"?

Now, where are those rubles you keep saying I'm going to get?

reply

[–] emori (3661) 6 months ago

Hon, russia literally hates every American and would nuke you all if there would be no consequences.
putin hates you all more then he hates Ukrainians. For russians America was always main enemy. They always hate it with hatred.

if russians could invade you then they would rape, kill and torture 10 times more then do it in Ukraine. And no - they would not spare you if you would scream that you are trumpists and love putin. They would laugh at you and continue.

I almost feel sorry for those trumpists. They are so pathetic and such cowards that they are willingly kiss feet of drunk russian loser Ivan in desperate hope that Ivan will somehow end fight against wokeness in USA. Honey - he won't. He doesnt care about your woke problem. Ivan despises you for being weak. russians laugh at you, trumpists. They don't see you as equal. For them you are their property. Their minions.

I wish you would comprehend how embarrassing and pathetic it is. Grow a balls inside your pants and fight wokeness yourself. putin is not gonna end it no matter how much you will suck his pee-pee.

reply

[–] maixiu (2220) 6 months ago

LOL!

You should take that act on the road.

reply

[–] emori (3661) 6 months ago

forgot to add. russians respect democrats because those fight them back. they fear them because they give weapons that kills russians. Because democrats put sanctions.

russians despise trumpists because those are weak and cowards. they don't respect you. they treat you like their property. like they can order you anything and you will say: "Yes master" and do it.

reply

[–] maixiu (2220) 6 months ago

Bat. Shit. Crazy.

reply

[–] Filmtenk2 (4045) 6 months ago

I've said it before but I truly believe Putin regrets not invading Ukraine when tfg was in office. Maybe he thought Biden was weak and could therefore get away with it. He was wrong. This is a nightmare for him & his regime.

reply

[–] CraigC (8177) 6 months ago

You are really a special kind of stupid.

reply

[–] emori (3661) 6 months ago

Sure Ivan. Go bow to your russian masters

reply

[–] CraigC (8177) 6 months ago

You're deranged. Which is ironic because the democrat party is actually beholding to China while pushing all the Russian collusion bullshit. I don't give a shit for any of you. Russia, China, democrats or your dumb ass.

reply

[–] CraigC (8177) 6 months ago

Oh no, more Russian collusion!

reply

[–] JoWilli (19964) 6 months ago

its funny how they believe russian collusion is real but dont believe the 2020 election was stolen.

reply

[–] CraigC (8177) 6 months ago

That's because they're easily duped and not heavy thinkers.

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17425) 6 months ago

He isn't getting replaced. The only people that think that court wasn't kangaroo are democrats, the media, and TDS sufferer's.

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

He was found guilty. It was a legitimate trial. He is now a convicted felon. Your feelings don't matter.

reply

[–] tvfan (12742) 6 months ago

There was nothing legitimate about the indictments, charges or that trial.

reply

[–] DarthAckbar (2044) 6 months ago

LOL!

reply

[–] JoWilli (19964) 6 months ago

LOL!

reply

[–] DarthAckbar (2044) 6 months ago

LOL!

reply

[–] BKB (9912) 6 months ago

I mean, you do understand the Appeal process and that even when people like Alan Dershowitz, who's not voting for Trump, would come out and say that what they did was inexcusable and never before seen in the 60 Years of service he's done

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

Alan Dershowitz hasn't done "service". He has catered to the elite.

reply

[–] BKB (9912) 6 months ago

He's performed 60 Years of service when you were nothing more than sperm in your Dad's dick

reply

[–] Yatzo (1924) 6 months ago

Dershowitz is a slimy asshole with deep Epstein connections. Thats the only reason he’s bloviating to Trumps base

reply

[–] CraigC (8177) 6 months ago

Wishful thinking. It was not a legitimate trial, it was a manufactured witch hunt. Has nothing to do with feelings and it will not survive appeal. They know this but they don't care. They just want him off the 2024 ballot. You're a sucker.

reply

[–] HarlemEagle42 (17745) 6 months ago

I think the party elite wants either DeSantis or Haley. Or hell, perhaps the pair on the same ticket.

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

DeSantis is very widely disliked by Republicans outside of Florida. Haley, I don't know. She is still a woman of color, two things that generally aren't liked by the Right wing.

reply

[–] maixiu (2220) 6 months ago

Mmm hmmm.

Normie-cons love to play the DR3 card: Dems 'R the Real Racists! Good god, look at how many of them are salivating this week over the number of blacks who say they now side with Trump (a small number in overall terms, but an increase to be sure). They crave minority approval just as much as the left. You want to make a shit-ton of money? Bring a conservative of color to something like CPAC and charge $10 a head to have a picture taken with him. You'll have marks lined up around the block willing to have photographic proof that they're just as color-blind as anyone else.

reply

[–] CraigC (8177) 6 months ago

Is that what CNN told you? All lies. Desantis is the most qualified and would be the front runner. Haley isn't disliked because she's a woman or "of color". She's disliked because she's an establishment choice, a RINO like Bush.

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) 6 months ago

Being targetted by this type of injustice and oppression makes him a BETTER candidate.

Instead of being a matter of policies, voting for him becomes a no brainer of either for or against human rights.

For human rights, vote for Trump.

Against human rights vote for the man that wants to win the Presidency by arresting his opposition leader.

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

His human rights have not been violated. He was charged and convicted because he committed crimes.

But are you admitting that Trump cannot win on his policies?

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) 6 months ago

1. Sure they have. Stop reacting and think for a second.

2. No. On policy Trump crushes Biden. But the choice of having a tyrannical government or not, is more important than say, economics. I rather be poor than oppressed. I rather have higher inflation than have political oppression and violence become the norm in this country.

That's why I said it made him a BETTER candidate rather than making him a GOOD candidate. BETTER implies that he was good, and is not BETTER. Especially in the context of my other posts in this thread.

Did you truly not understand that?

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

Tyrannical government? Trump is the one promising to rid the government of anyone who is not 100% loyal to HIM. Not to the constitution. Not to the rule of law. To HIM.
He is the one talking of political oppression and going after his enemies with the courts. He is the one talking about death and destruction if he loses.
He talks about these things all the time rather than about policies. His die hard fans don't care about policies. They whine about him being brought to justice.
But I do agree, Trump is not a good candidate.

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) 6 months ago

1. The concept of a neutral civil service, is based on them being NEUTRAL. When you people decided to politicize and weaponize the government, YOU choose to end that tradition. Naturally your enemies would respond to your escalation.

Trump needs to purge the government of all dem partisans. As do all republican presidents moving forward. Truthfully the plan I have heard him pushing, doesn't sound nearly tough enough.

2. I ask again. Did you really not understand my previous point about "better"? Because I thought I was pretty clear.

reply

[–] Grifterhunter (1406) 6 months ago

So then the jury is corrupt as well? I should trust you over a jury?

reply

[–] Yatzo (1924) 6 months ago

For “law and order” vote for Trump!
He can give press conferences from jail in an orange jumpsuit

reply

[–] WandererFromYs (2309) 6 months ago

Why would they replace him? He’s neck and neck with Biden, and he can possibly win, and this hasn’t hurt him at all.

Anyone with a brain knows that All felonies are not equal, and no one actually cares about this “crime” except democrats that want to weaponize it.

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

He's a convicted criminal. How can we have a convicted criminal a president?

reply

[–] maixiu (2220) 6 months ago

So you'd have been disgusted with the idea of Nelson Mandela as president of South Africa. The guy was a convicted criminal!

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

I can never decide if Trump is more like Mandella, Mother Theresa, Jesus or Abraham Lincoln

reply

[–] maixiu (2220) 6 months ago

Mandela was a convicted criminal who became president of his country. You've just indicated that such a turn of events is beyond the pale. Why are you so racist?

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

Okay, after Trump serves 27 years in prison and committed himself to peaceful democracy and healing of racial animus, we can elect him.

reply

[–] maixiu (2220) 6 months ago

So Mandela was required to serve those years and commit himself to the ideologies of the men who put him there before you would allow him to become president?

You, sir, are a pillar of mercy!

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) 6 months ago

Liberals make points, and then get confused when you address those points.

God forbid that you try to hold them to the point they made. That concept is always completely alien to them.

What is revealed here, is that Info NEVER gave a damn about the convictions. THe moment you applied that to another example, he just moved to another line of attack.

He said that because he doesn't want to discuss his real reasons for opposing Trump.

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

"Info never have a damn about the convictions."

All I did was echo what Trump said about Hillary in 2016, when she didn't ever get indicted for anything.

reply

[–] Corbell (10995) 6 months ago

So, i was right, you posted as though you were making a point, and the guy you were talking to responded to that point as though you had made a point, but really, you were just talking shit?

OK. moving forward, how do we know when you are being serious or talking shit?

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

Mandela isn't on the ballot, so I don't know why you are talking about him. Neither is Jesus or Mother Theresa, BTW

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

You think that Mandella committed to the ideologies of the period who imprisoned him?

Oh, please stop making such a fool of yourself!

reply

[–] BKB (9912) 6 months ago

I'll take a so called convicted criminal who genuinely loves the United States of America over an elderly man who shakes hands with no one there and tells the black community they're not black unless they vote for him or Democrat in general.. Need I go on?? 🤔

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

Trump is an elderly man who babbles incoherently and promises to give the country away to wealthy corporate donors. And he really is a convicted felon, not a "so-called" one.

reply

[–] BKB (9912) 6 months ago

He doesn't babble incoherently and is actually quite fluid when he speaks and you'd have to have both ears covered screaming LALALALALALALA with your TDS to not comprehend what he's saying.. And how come you didn't respond to a Racist like Joe Biden telling black America they're not black unless they vote for him or Democrat?? Don't blow this shit off!! WTF?? If Trump had said something like this, you wouldn't shut up over it along with the rest of the pinhead liberals at this site you hypocrite 🙄

reply

[–] Yatzo (1924) 6 months ago

Did you hear that FOX interview on Sunday!? He said he never sleeps and never said lock her up!

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

“Has anyone ever seen ‘The Silence of the Lambs? The late, great Hannibal Lecter. He’s a wonderful man.
He often times would have a friend for dinner. Remember the last scene? ‘Excuse me, I’m about to have a friend for dinner,’ as this poor doctor walks by. ‘I’m about to have a friend for dinner.’ But Hannibal Lecter. Congratulations, the late, great Hannibal Lecter…”

reply

[–] BKB (9912) 6 months ago

WTF does that have anything to do with anything?? 🤔

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

Exactly. That is a recent babble from Trump at one of his rallies.

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

Please provide evidence that Trump loves this country.

reply

[–] BKB (9912) 6 months ago

You and your bullshit of "SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE!!" SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE!!" I show you the evidence and predictably, you shit all over it.. Now, I just put this other doofus on ignore about 2 minutes ago in the form of "Emori" for doing the very same thing you're doing and I won't hesitate for 1 second to stick your ass on ignore as well because you bring 0 to any conversation other than going round and round to ad nauseum.

https://www.liberty.edu/champion/2020/10/opinion-trumps-policies-show-that-he-loves-america/

Here doofus

reply

[–] db20db (17237) 6 months ago

DON'T! You're putting yourself at a disadvantage by putting these creeps on Ignore. This is why Trump was so welcomed at the recent UFC event. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvlTJrNJ5lA

reply

[–] BKB (9912) 6 months ago

How so?? I don't have to see their comments which 95% of it is pure trolling and after awhile, a person only has some much of a thresh hold of tolerance before you simply shut em out.. 🤔

reply

[–] db20db (17237) 6 months ago

It's just my take on the Ignore function. I did it accidentally once and felt like it obscured too much in a thread. I like to maintain an awareness of what my adversaries are saying. But I get your frustration. Trying to have a discourse with some of these assholes too often seems like pissing into the wind. It's like they're clones, having come out of the same mold.

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

You don't have any of your own thoughts so you posted that link?

That shows he panders to Christians and otherwise dies things that any president does. How does it show he loves the country?

He doesn't respect the law. He doesn't respect the democrstic process.
Every day he says the country is a shithole. He says our soldiers who died for our freedom were sucker's and losers. He complains all the time but wants the military to shoot American citizens who complain through protests. He's a jerk.

reply

[–] BKB (9912) 6 months ago

Well I suppose with son Hunter on trial for a Felony, we're going to find out now aren't we?? Hunter goes to jail and I guarantee his Dad intervenes and prevents it

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

I'd take that berry if they was any way to enforce it. But what does that have to do with whether Trump loves America? Have you abandoned that claim?

reply

[–] BKB (9912) 6 months ago

Trump does love America, I posted a link to it and once again you predictably shit on it because it doesn't align with your trolling narrative

https://www.liberty.edu/champion/2020/10/opinion-trumps-policies-show-that-he-loves-america/

I mean, you wanted proof and there are other links as well if you're not satisfied with this one

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

I shit on it because it's shit. You have a hard time with the concept of proof, don't you.

Your article cited several instance where Trump took a position aligning the government with a religion. That is directly antithetical to the Constitution of the United States. That is the foundation of our country. How can he love a country when he aligns against its foundations?

reply

[–] Yatzo (1924) 6 months ago

It’s only June…he’s falling apart

reply

[–] maixiu (2220) 6 months ago

During Pride month??!! How dare he take away attention from the very best humans among us?

reply

[–] TrentnQuarantino (9187) 6 months ago

Trump support has reportedly ... that is reportedly ... fallen significantly so that if it was true across the board there is no chance he would win. But all the other Republicans would do worse. The Republican party has been deranged for decades now, but anything they do is supported by a manipulative cloud of global elite who hide from the public on the other side of media reality, and who despite almost limitless power, they clearly do not know what they are doing and are botching everything and alienatinig everyone.

reply

[–] CraigC (8177) 6 months ago

Is that how he managed to raise over $50m in a matter of hours, because his support is waning?

reply

[–] TrentnQuarantino (9187) 6 months ago

A few very rich people who want to screw over the country with Trump ... I don't think you are probably in their gang.

reply

[–] CraigC (8177) 6 months ago

Bullshit. You dumbasses are constantly on about republicans and the evil rich. While 99% of the billionaires and massive corporations have thrown in with the democrat party.

reply

[–] TrentnQuarantino (9187) 6 months ago

Welcome to ignore.
You really have to be an outstanding scumbag for years for me to go this far.

B1cKsurN
BKB
Bloodworth79
Bubbathegut
chilone
Corbell
CraigC
DMT
Dsx2006
Gd5150
Golfaddict666
JoWilli
Keelai
moviechatterer
Rorikon
Skavau
tvfan
WarrenPeace

reply

[–] CraigC (8177) 6 months ago

Then you have no cogent argument, which is typical.

Oh I may cry myself to sleep now.

reply

[–] javie (2216) 6 months ago

His lack in judgemnet shows he's not eallly in his right mind.

reply

[–] BKB (9912) 6 months ago

Your liberal tears will taste ever so delicious when this man beats Biden in a landslide and America has finally seen right through this bullshit and yours and so much, even "Never Trumpers" are now going to vote for him and that's gotta sting a little now doesn't it?? You turned misdemeanors into Felonies because you couldn't have done it any other way.. Let me put it to you another way: You get pulled over for speeding, you're issued a citation over it, but instead of paying probably $100.00, you're not going to jail for 30 Days instead.. You Ok with that?? 🤔

reply

[–] Information-Police (4889) 6 months ago

A jury of his peers decided he was guilty of 38 felonies. The democratic part did not decide that. The democratic party did not commit those felonies, either. Trump did. I don't expect you to accept that since you can't even accept the fact of a straight forward election.

reply

[–] maixiu (2220) 6 months ago

Your implication is that the mere fact that it was a jury trial makes it above board. So if Tyrone was tried by a white jury in 1926 Mississippi for the crime of stealing chickens and was sentenced to be hanged by the neck until dead, you'd be OK with it? After all, these were Tyrone's peers.

reply

[–] Yatzo (1924) 6 months ago

1926?

reply

[–] JoWilli (19964) 6 months ago

you are forgetting that Trump was indicted in a democrat state by democrat DA and there was a democrat judge and the jurors were democrat. also the Biden DOJ was in contact with Bragg and was at the press conference with Bragg. some people still wont accept that Trump won fair and square in 2016. Nancy said the election was hijacked and had cold hard evidence of collusion.

reply