To be what all of us same people already knew...
The shooter was a Woke, AntiWhite racist that wanted to murder White Kid "Faggots" for their "White Privilege"...
No wonder the Media has been bending over backwards to protect this terrorist.
________________________
Leftists always lie.
Wokeness is Fascism+Hypocrisy.
Otherism is worse than Racism.
so our side has 1. and your side has 1000's
so you will finally join us in calling for more gun control?
Gun control doesn't work. Only Oppressive, authoritarian tyrants want gun control.
Your whole post is a microcosm of the real problem...guns don't kill until a mentally disturbed human picks one up. This is not a partisan issue.
I can no longer take you seriously.
________________________
Leftists always lie.
Wokeness is Fascism+Hypocrisy.
Otherism is worse than Racism.
it only works in every single western country that has it.aka them all!
meanwhile the one that has the worst, the US, has the most shootings.
objective proof it works. your welcome
objective proof it works. your welcome
Free people have access to guns, slaves don’t.
'All civilizations' kill and murder whether by guns, objects, hands, feet, etc.
You are already a slave, so you have no other choice but to accept simplicity.
Those other countries are not USA and they are irrelevant.
this wasnt a response to what i said. this was a dodge. ill take that as your concession :) im 2/2 so far. last time your scurried away too at least you sort of saved face there despite looking utterely silly.
https://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/653eea6fa7f48457c57f521e/Is-Anti-Zionism-Anti-Semitism?reply=65480b63ebc51c64414d2d5f
"asking proof is imbecilic!"
Once again, I'm not the one begging others for proof.
Oh, so you are been competitive like a juvenile, lol.
Once again, I'm not the one begging others for proof.
There is something familiar about that clown, a possible sock for the previous dumbass that ended in an echo chamber, lol.
shareI'm sure at least one guy in the world is shocked. The rest of us, not so much.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8cUy163_rg
I wasn't shocked in the least...but it's nice to have it confirmed.
________________________
Leftists always lie.
Wokeness is Fascism+Hypocrisy.
Otherism is worse than Racism.
Not surprising that it was another false flag as usual.
shareWait? You're claiming this specific shooting was a "false flag"? Where is the evidence for this?
shareDid you even read the OP?
Are you aware of what I'm referring to or is that another of your usual pre-programmed NPC replies?
I know exactly what you're referring to. The shooter in the Nashville schools manifesto has leaked. I imagined you'd be one of the first to claim that the trans-shooter was completely legit, of all killings.
shareHe's too stupid for that.
shareIf you knew than why ask?
shareSo where's the evidence that this was a false flag?
shareDon't you ever get weary of begging others for evidence like a little child?
shareThis is literally a discussion forum. Should no-one challenge you on things you say? Should we just accept everything you say without any argument?
shareAs I just stated to the other clown:
It is called "confirming or verifying" which you are capable of doing on your own without requiring others to do it for you.
Confirming *what*? You just pulled this allegation from your ass.
shareI know exactly what you're referring to.
Confirming *what*?
Confirm that your claim of this shooting is a false flag. It's a simple request.
shareI know the event. I'm asking you for evidence that it was a false flag.
sharehttps://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/6548ffdc4bafc912fed2da99/so-what-IS-a-workable-solution-for-usa-gun-issue?reply=6549a173d0305f236f441c85
he took ""confirming or verifying"" from our convo. i explained to him he burden of proof and he took one part of it and misunderstood it because, hes an idiot
bless his soul. he cant even understand simple concepts. he doesnt understand the burden of proof. and he mixes up simple words and concepts with others then declares victory.
tvfan needs to be wearing a helmet at all times.
Everyone knows that leftists don't care about proof; if they did, they would not ask for it in the first place and they would find it themselves to verify/confirm or refute/debunk.
Many times, you idiots whine about "the burden of proof is on you" bullshit and when it is provided, you idiots dismiss, ignore, and reject them.
This is why clowns like you are never to be taken seriously...thanks for making this point for me.
Btw, I'm only stating all this for others to see why it is always futile providing you clowns with proof or evidence of anything.....ever.
>Everyone knows that leftists don't care about proof; if they did, they would not ask for it in the first place and they would find it themselves to verify/confirm or refute/debunk.
You can't disprove a negative, dude. Why are other people obligated to search the internet to see if there's any evidence for ridiculous claims that you make?
>Many times, you idiots whine about "the burden of proof is on you" bullshit and when it is provided, you idiots dismiss, ignore, and reject them.
The premise of the burden of proof isn't some leftist thing. People who make claims are usually expected to back it up. It's just social etiquette.
>This is why clowns like you are never to be taken seriously...thanks for making this point for me.
And you think that you should be taken seriously when you literally throw accusations about people, and specific events?
>Btw, I'm only stating all this for others to see why it is always futile providing you clowns with proof or evidence of anything.....ever.
And every time you make an outrageous allegation, I'll ask you for evidence.
99.9% of them are by leftists.
No one is obligating you to ask for proof or evidence every single time like an ignorant child. Only an NPC does that, or a shill.
Btw, you are another leftist that has proven my point several times about everything that I just stated.
>99.9% of them are by leftists.
Evidence please.
>No one is obligating you to ask for proof or evidence every single time like an ignorant child. Only an NPC does that, or a shill.
I didn't say anyone was. But when I see you make a ridiculous claim, I will ask you for evidence. This is a public forum and people have every right to challenge your bullshit. Cope and seethe.
You can challenge, question, and beg for proof/evidence all day long, it doesn't mean you will get it, so yes, you would have to cope and seethe without it, lol.
shareAnd you'll have to get used to people challenging you on your bullshit.
shareAnd they will always receive the same reply or no reply....you should be familiar with that by now.
shareThat doesn't matter. It's not for you, but also for others.
Also I'd like to hear the logic behind the government supposedly framing a transperson for a mass-shooting. This is comical even for you.
It's not for you, but also for others.
Still waiting for evidence.
Also also I'd like to hear the logic behind the government supposedly framing a transperson for a mass-shooting. This is comical even for you.
Where did I mention anything about framing?
Oh, wait, so you really didn't know what I was referring to before you jumped in, begging for evidence.
>Where did I mention anything about framing?
So in what way are you alleging this is a false flag?
"A false flag operation is an act committed with the intent of disguising the actual source of responsibility and pinning blame on another party."
Who is it that did this shooting, in your mind? And for what motive?
Careful... You're going to make his head explode.
shareIf you would just post your evidence of the claims that you keep making here you would be a hero. Trump might even give you a Big Mac for the evidence that the 2020 election was rigged.
shareSo just show your proof. Why is it so difficult for you to post evidence of your claims? The only point that's proven by you is how stupid you are.
Let's say I told you that Santa Claus is real. You would say prove it. So now instead of posting evidence to prove Santa is real I would tell you to find your own proof.
That's not how it works, Goober. If you didn't drop out of middle school then you would know this.
all that to still not provide evidence? just whining about "the leftists"
you got bodied by me tonight :) tuck tail and leave little sissy
Just so you know he believes that anyone who disagrees with him is a leftist. He's very simple minded.
shareI almost feel bad. Also pretty sure he thinks if he posts last he automatically wins the argument.
sharei feel like he should be escorted to his own special segment of Moviechat where he just argues with bots. also love how the moderators let him talk shit and swear not just abit but go all out and say heinous things and dont do anything.
shareAre you admitting that you are one of those bots?
also love how the moderators let him talk shit and swear not just abit but go all out and say heinous things and dont do anything.
You're losing here but you are too stupid to see it. Just think what a hero you would be if you provide valid evidence of your many claims.
shareYou know damn well if you had any proof of your claims you be screaming it from the rooftops. But you don't. Why is that?
shareA little child? Your lack of self awareness is astounding. It's works like this, Goober. You make a claim then you provide proof of the claim. It's that simple. Making baseless claims continuously just shows how stupid you are really are. Why won't you post your evidence?
shareHe simply asked for evidence of your claims. Why do you continue to avoid this?
shareAnother false flag killing? Do you have proof that this or any other mass shooting was a false flag? You really are a dumb fuck.
share" another false flag as usual."
jeeez you are dumb!
do you even know what false flag means ?
or is it something you've seen people say and you know its some kind of "get out" for inexcusable far right violence but dont understand it?
Tell me which particular flags you think are flying in this instance and who flew them.
some kind of "get out" for inexcusable far right violence
you are correct
Nobody said it was .
We all agree the tranny shooter would be called a progressive , or a lefty if you will .
But you calling that a "false Flag" implies that you the right are in fact taking reponsibility and were operating undercover as lefties ... a "false Falg"
Thats what false flag means - the other side dunnit
Thats why you hear righties saying it everytime the get caught doensg something naufghty
they "Oh it wasnt us , the lefties done it - it was a false flag"
We didnt startt jan 6 - undefcover lefties in the crwod started it .. Fals Flag!
get it ?
I think the time is right to have a serious discussion regarding Antiwhite Hate & Racism. It's become just a bit too accepted now. If we have leaned anything from WWII, its to not allow any one group become "Othered"...well, some of us have learned this.
________________________
Leftists always lie.
Wokeness is Fascism+Hypocrisy.
Otherism is worse than Racism.
Ain't going to happen but there should be. Anti-white racism is a thing and shouldn't be shrugged of, smirked at, laughed at, met with eyerolls etc. Could be a case here of being so widespread, accepted and normalized by society that a racially motivated mass murder has been carried out by a person of the same race as the victims. That could be a first.
share[deleted]
Couple of obvious points.
1. Violence and aggression manifest differently in different groups. Far left violence tends more to say, RIOTS and BURNING SHIT DOWN, as opposed to lone shooters. You people do love your herds. Looking att the last few years, your side is the more violent.
2. The crazy shooters on the right, tend to be from the FAR RIGHT FRINGE, not the right mainstream, nazis, white supremacists. Being a tranny progressive anti-white racist, this guy is a poster boy/girl/it for your side's MAINSTREAM.
3. And of course, the difference with the way hte media strokes up hysterica over it, ie NOT.
(2) I would argue that anyone willing to commit mass murder is from the fringe. What makes this person "mainstream" on the left anymore than than the Maine shooter, Robert Card?
shareBeing trans and being anti-white racist. Both issues that are required beliefs by the mainstream left. Hell,l I don't know if we can even call them "left" as their policies are being enacted by law and practice thoughout society, with only limited pushback by conservatives.
THey might just be the Status Quo now.
>Being trans and being anti-white racist.
You think most leftists are transgendered?
And I await evidence that most leftists are anti-white.
> Both issues that are required beliefs by the mainstream left. Hell,l I don't know if we can even call them "left" as their policies are being enacted by law and practice thoughout society, with only limited pushback by conservatives.
What policies, specifically?
What makes this person "mainstream" on the left anymore than than the Maine shooter, Robert Card?
1. Yes, both issues are mainstream left. Don't be silly.
2. From anti-white discrimination as policy to general anti-whitet racism found in scientific studies, the anti-white racism of the left is...universially observed and documented. Your denial is fucking retarded. Drop it. I will not pretend to have a converstaion with someone talking complete shit.
1. You specifically said *being trans*, not specifically just *supporting* trans-issues.
2. Name me some state-sanctioned examples, and provide evidence that most leftists support this. And I'll say and ask whatever the fuck I like and to whoever I like, and without your permission.
And I am still waiting for why this person is somehow representative of the left, but not the Maine Shooter.
1. LOL. Semantics, BORING. Find a more interesting way of being evasive, or dont bother responding.
2. ALL the attempts of AA, and diviersty over the last 60 years. FOr one example.
1. You think that it's semantics to say there's a difference between *being trans* and *supporting trans-issues*?
2. Affirmative Action. Okay. Can you specify more when it comes to "diversity"?
And I'll ask AGAIN: And I am still waiting for why this person is somehow representative of the left, but not the Maine Shooter.
1. Strike two.
2. Nope. It's a general statement about a big, massive issue. your request for finer details is a dodge.
1. What the fuck are you on about? I'll reply to you how I like no matter how many "strikes" you say.
2. So you have no concrete policies you're referring to. You just complain about affirmative action.
3. And I'll ask AGAIN: And I am still waiting for why this person is somehow representative of the left, but not the Maine Shooter.
1. Strike three.
2. Your absurd denial is noted.
1. Oh no! What happens if I keep getting strikes? What are you 12?
2. Denial of what?
And I am still waiting for why this person is somehow representative of the left, but not the Maine Shooter.
Answer this please. Not answering anything else until you answer this.
Conversation's over. You are just being silly and I refuse to play.
shareAnd I am still waiting for why this person is somehow representative of the left, but not the Maine Shooter.
shareConversation's over, you are just being silly and I refuse to play.
shareAnd I am still waiting for why this person is somehow representative of the left, but not the Maine Shooter.
shareYour denial of clear massive examples and semantic games are you deciding to not discuss the issue seriously.
So, why you are responding, if you are not willing to discuss the issue?
I'm pushing it back to the thread itself: Why is this person (the trans-shooter) somehow representative of the left, but not the Maine Shooter who had social media patterns very common of many rightists on here.
shareI'm "pushing it back" on the fact that you ignored a massive example and played silly semantic games.
That is you deciding to not discuss the issue seriously.
So, what is your purpose even responding to me then?
I continue to wait for an answer. I already told you I'm not playing ball until you answer.
Why is this person (the trans-shooter) somehow representative of the left, but not the Maine Shooter who had social media patterns very common of many rightists on here.
I'm "pushing it back" on the fact that you ignored a massive example and played silly semantic games.
That is you deciding to not discuss the issue seriously.
So, what is your purpose even responding to me then?
I continue to wait for an answer. I already told you I'm not playing ball until you answer.
Why is this person (the trans-shooter) somehow representative of the left, but not the Maine Shooter who had social media patterns very common of many rightists on here.
I'm "pushing it back" on the fact that you ignored a massive example and played silly semantic games.
That is you deciding to not discuss the issue seriously.
So, what is your purpose even responding to me then?
I continue to wait for an answer. I already told you I'm not playing ball until you answer.
Why is this person (the trans-shooter) somehow representative of the left, but not the Maine Shooter who had social media patterns very common of many rightists on here.
And if I did answer, why should I expect you to respond any more seriously to that answer then to my last ones?
Clearly you don't want to discuss this issue.
I've asked you why you are here. You refuse to answer.
I will guess that it is to make sure that there is no real discuss about the tranny mass murderer being a lefty.
You refuse to answer me. This is non-negotiable.
>I will guess that it is to make sure that there is no real discuss about the tranny mass murderer being a lefty.
My question literally brings up the fact that they were - but it's asking you why if they're representative, that the right-wing shooter in Maine is somehow *not* representative of right-wingers.
Why is this person (the trans-shooter) somehow representative of the left, but not the Maine Shooter who had social media patterns very common of many rightists on here.
I answered and instead of serously responding to my points, you played silly games. You denied that affrimative action is anti-white racism, and you requested more details about the big diff between "being trans" and "supporting trans".
That nonsense from you. Retarded nonsens which I am in no mood to pander to. So, rejected.
You did not answer my question about the Maine shooter here.
You refuse to answer me. This is non-negotiable.
>I will guess that it is to make sure that there is no real discuss about the tranny mass murderer being a lefty.
My question literally brings up the fact that they were - but it's asking you why if they're representative, that the right-wing shooter in Maine is somehow *not* representative of right-wingers.
Why is this person (the trans-shooter) somehow representative of the left, but not the Maine Shooter who had social media patterns very common of many rightists on here.
Being trans and being anti-white racist. Both issues that are required beliefs by the mainstream left.
whut? wtf ?
how can you *possibly* be serious about that ?
Ho many of the roughly 50% of the votes that went to Biden do you think came from white non trannies?
Can a man menstrate?
sharelol, he is going to say yes and then provide you with internet scriptures to back up his delusion.
shareLOL. sounds about right.
shareDo you think they will try to arrest Crowder for leaking the Murderfesto?
shareOh no. They would never do THAT.
Of course, they might, no connection, find an excuse to go though his entire life and find something that they can spin into 91 felonies, really TRUE crimes, that they totally would have found in the normal course of events...
They fired a bunch of cops... that's insane. There must more in that Murderfesto they realllllly don't want getting out. I can't for it to come out.
shareThey are really invested in having anyone in a position of any power or responsibility, being onboard with the narrative.
They really expect that any "good person" would just know that information that reflects badly on lefties, should be suppressed, and they see anyone that disagrees with that, as...
basically nazis.
They literally can't imagine that anyone would think differently then them. So if they DO differently than they would do it, it must be because they WANT bad things to happen.
no a man cant menstruate.
point im making is
- not all Dems are trans , which is the way he worded it ,
- dems do not believe trannies and "real women" are the same thing .
- dems do not persecute trannies , they just leave them alone do whatever they wanna do
Dems DO believe that trannies are real women. That is why we see men and boys in womens and girls sports, really fucking them up, and men in women's prison, LITERALLY fucking them up.
The line between the far left and the left, seems to be moving so fast as to be invisible or pointless. What is radical today, is mainstream policy LATER TODAY.
It's no surprise they suppressed this. It shows that this murderous little freak is a product manufactured by the CRT/DIE indoctrination infecting the nation. Another school shooter driven to murder by the American Left's anti-White hate propaganda.
shareNever look up the #VerifiedHate hashtag on twitter!
________________________
Leftists always lie.
Wokeness is Fascism+Hypocrisy.
Otherism is worse than Racism.
This is from last year but for me sums up the response when anti-white hate is brought up. Label any mention of anti-white hate as racist and spin it so non-whites are the victims when it comes to anti-white hate.
https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/stop-white-hate-sign-bellingham-high-school/
Hale must have has self hatred for being white. If the mayor and chief of police were aware of the monster's hate and intentions and did nothing. They should be held accountable.
share