MovieChat Forums > quartz > Replies
quartz's Replies
It would have been interesting to actually see the logistics of parking an SR-71 on an aircraft carrier
Surf Nazi's Must Die is the most difficult to watch film I've seen. When I say difficult, each scene doesn't have any continuity from the previous one, and your brain is trying to connect what's happening. It almost causes a headache. the easiest part of it to watch, is the credits. I thought well done to the people in the credits.
This post makes no sense. The T-800 didn't have points. Most of the components were smooth machine finished parts.
Deepwater Horizon if you want everything to explode
Apart from "holey rusted metal Batman", the only line I remember from this film is Arnold going "cawld, like my cawld heart". you could see he was literally reading a script in an amusing "Arnold" "I've received quite a large pay packet for being in this film" style. couldn't hate it. I've only watched this once and it was when it was in the cinema. I remember one of the icicles being slightly springy
Obi Wan told him as a Force ghost on Dagobah that she was his sister (he figured it out when OW mentioned his 'sister' - what with Leia being the only female in the galaxy apart from Mon Mothma and some of the staff on Hoth), and I assume he assumed Obi Wan was assuming he would assume Obi Wan was implying it was about the Force, not just about being siblings
what I'm [i]not[/i] actually sure of, is how Luke knew to call out to Leia when he was dangling underneath Cloud city - given that at that time he had no idea they were related or connected. I assume it's just.....Force stuff
He posted in Street Hawk, but his post made no sense. Got to admit, he's on a f-ckin roll on this (Matrix) movies page.
This post make no sense. Both of those programs are set in the same reality (gravity, light), but they are in separate fictional universes. Street Hawk has no knowledge that Knight Rider exists, and therefore cannot wannabe it.
If anyone's wondering, no one's saying we don't all fucking h*** i**igr**ts. We have craploads of them coming over in dinghy's from France, because the French don't want them. (it's why we say nice things to France in Eurovision - in the hope they'll s***t a few of them in return). I just think (in this example) blaming faulty landing gear on employing illegal br**n people is....slightly far fetched. But no doubt true. It didn't actually blame them, it [i]implied[/i] them, which isn't better. I mean I wouldn't want an illegal b***n person conducting safety checks on the integrity of landing gear on a commercial aircraft I was flying on. or someone yelling all** fucking ***bar, I'd want some ******* ***** **** ** ****** of ****** **** ***** **** ****** ** their ass
Some of what James Woods says is reasonable. No one's arguing about people who are saying they are a female if they still have a d1ck. No one's arguing that Starbucks is being retarded by putting a poster of a woman with their t*ts cut off, saying they are now a guy. Because they want to sell cups of fucking coffee. "oh no, it's representation". yeah, it's that, and not "buy our stuff".
I mean fuck, it was a dickless ad campaign (get it yeah, because it had a fucking tr*n in it) but I still mentioned it.
One of his recent posts is of a plane that landed without it's front undercarriage, with the phrase "diversity is our strength". **** *** actual **** *** **** *** ** ** with ************* airplane *************? ******* if **'* ********** **** Boeing *** ********* ******* ********** to ******** airplanes, **** **. ***** ****. ***** **** ******** ****** protocols.
Half of the last week of his timeline just seems to ** ***** ******** *****. Which you can agree or disagree with.
I'm here for moviechat.org. not ** ** *** * **** ********.org, or **** *** **** ***** ************** ***.com. but ******r. it's a fuckin m*d, m*d, m*d, m*d world.
Basically he's a ********t and I'm agreeing with you.
(edited for clarity)
Speaking of ******* ***********. *** *** a ***** of *********** ** *** ****, **** a ******** ** of **** **** a ******* ******?
Do ****** *** ***************s ******* **** ****y **** t*** ***m ********* *** ** *****, **** ****d ********** **s***?
**** is *** **** ** *********** *** *****t fr** ****s.
Edited huh.
Whatever. I'm here to talk about things on screen, not politics or some guy who who s*i** **s *r**** ** *** ** *** ****, ** ** *** ***** ** *-*** *** *** ***** ** ******** * ** *** **** ******* **** *** *e****** ***** **** **********s *** **** ** ** ****** ** ** ****b*
alt account edited, huh.
Arguing with some people is like ******* ** * ******* *****
Was that comment something to do with me?
I was fine with the idea that the whole outback cafe location was a delusion, and that they turned out to be his personalities. (are many people called 'Paris'? the only person called Paris I know of is the s'leb). When he strangled the guy in the car at the end, was that suggesting that every time he killed a person (one of his personalities) in the movie he killed someone in real life? or during the length of the movie was he just killing off his own personalities. I figured that the final car twist was setting the way for a sequel
k.
20 minutes from the end of almost 2 hours, the truck hit it at speed "point blank", and the damage to the T-800 was a slight limp (if you watch at 1:27:05, there is no limp, the limp appears to have started at about 1:27:10). That's reasonably indestructible from a cinematic point of view. During the length of the film, the damage to the T-800 was a gashed arm and one eye taken out, during a car chase with "small arms" or whatever you want to call them. During T1, the T-800 was portrayed for the length of the film as being fairly unstoppable, although having some vulnerabilities. In T5, they got hold of some upgraded weaponry.
yeah. I'm struggling to find out what the argument is here. I'm saying T1 portrayed the robot as being near-invincible, you're saying it wasn't. I'm saying in T5, out came a gun that could easily kill it, and you're saying "it's just a gun". Ok.
In the majority of the first Terminator film, the robot was portrayed as being impossible to stop with the resources they had at hand.
"invincible robot"
Throughout most of T1, it was impossible to stop it. I don't have the exact dialogue to hand. Or to be more precise, [i]portrayed[/i] as being impossible to stop.