MovieChat Forums > David1616 > Replies
David1616's Replies
No "far right" or White identatarian openly advocates that a less qualified White person should get a job or university admission ahead of a more qualified Black person. The opposite is obviously the foundation of left wing ideology. My point stands.
There is no evidence slavery has anything to do with Black poverty today. In fact the evidence says otherwise. What makes you think we all deserve the same opportunities? Whites and Blacks are not people with different skin color. They are different ethnic groups. And today Blacks have in many ways more opportunities than Whites (DEI, affirmative action, government favors to Black owned businesses...)
I see another childish ad hominem and no arguments. Yawn.
I owned you because you asked me to list examples and after I did, you ignored them and started name calling. Typical behavior of someone who loses an argument.
How could he have helped them? Sorry but an ad hominem is not an argument.
All I see is a bunch of childish insults because I owned you. IF you don't read the list of don't respond that much better for me, because you admit you lost. I didn't waste time typing it because OTHER people will read it.
" By 2045 whites will become a minority in the US and whites 18 and younger are already a minority. That's got to piss you off!"
Only because Whites are deliberately being lied to about race and not told example of what I listed above. If Americans knew the truth, it would be the other way around.
What is your point? Everyone had slaves. My point is people who are today called "White supremacists" don't have ANY double standards, while the left has at least a dozen.
> Asks me to name an example of what I asked in my challenge.
> I list literally a dozen.
> "I won't bother reading your list. You are racist"
Could your reply even be any more pathetic?
See my reply to robocat
1. Blacks have a right to identity and pride, Whites don't. In fact, they have to feel ashamed of being White.
2. Blacks have a right to exclusive organizations, Whites don't.
3. Blacks have a right to their safe spaces, Whites don't
4. If Black and brown countries have a nativist immigration policies, it's OK, if Whites do it, it's a moral outrage
5. White history should be rewritten to be full of minorities eve if it's pseudohistorical. Black and browns have a right to their exclusive history
6. Blacks/browns have a right to genetic survival ie. openly advocate for their people to marry within their race. If Whites do it, it's a moral outrage
7. Blacks should get ahead in college admissions and hiring before Whites, even if merit and thus fairness and even society's interest says otherwise.
8. What is considered racism and bigotry should be different for Whites and Blacks. Ie. the line of what is racism should be lower for Whites and much higher for Blacks. Some even say Blacks cannot be racist.
9. White people should have guilt for their bad historic behavior, Black and brown people shouldn't have guilt for their bad historic behavior even if in some cases they behaved worse.
10. White should NOT be capitalized. Blacks SHOULD be capitalized.
11. Problems of Black and brown people should be blamed on Whites (CRT). Problems of Whites should also be blamed on Whites. Nothing should be blamed on Blacks even when it's obvious only they can fix them.
12. Blacks and browns should be given credit for their historical achievements (even when they’re very small). Whites shouldn’t be given credit for their historical achievements.(because that would be “White supremacy”)
I could probably list even more... Now it's up to you to show me those on the far right (so called "White supremacists")
Fist of all this was not my point at all. I'm not a blind Trumptard or a MAGA cultist, But since you brought this up, I have to respond to some of your so called "points"
Trump and thus Jan 6 wouldn't have happened if America was all White. Populist politicians get elected when there is a shadow resentment against elite in the country ie where there is a perception that ruling class isn't connected to the ordinary citizen and his grievances. Wonder why there is no Trump in Canada?
There is no pattern of police brutality against Black people, only general police brutality, but that is expectable given the crime rates and stress/threat police are subjected to in America compared to say a country like Iceland or Finland who are - low and behold - much less diverse and thus more safe.
BLM riots were objectively worse than Jan 6. both in terms of time lasted, casualties and damage caused. Jan 6 was caused by a few angry political partisans desperate at the system which neglected them for 40 years and at most if you want a mistake by one person - Trump who didn't do enough to tell them to stop. BLM riots were caused by deliberate lies on behalf of the media and education in America who has spewed lies about Blacks being victims of police for decades and and lies of them being victims of society in general. Even if BLM grievances were legit (which they weren't) it would still be irresponsible for the media to incite them given the potential damage they tend to cause materially and loss of life.
No I'm not. A political idea is not terrorism. Terrorism is using violence.
Thanks for admitting you can't name a single example of a double standard that White nationalists have. Thanks for admitting White nationalists aren't immoral and unfair.
LOL It's not a distraction. It's a counter argument. You completely ignored my argument and just repeated a distraction that I have already addressed and debunked.
Name me a single thing that White nationalist want to take away from non Whites. Name me a single example of a double standard of White nationalists. I'm waiting.
1. You didn't address any of my arguments. If an ethnic group is brainwashed to hate themselves and on top of that aren't allowed to be on their own side while all other groups are, than this group doesn't really have power. In fact, they are oppressed.
2. Anti Semitism is irrational and unfair hostility of Jews. Saying an ethnic group has it's own prejudices and biases is not irrational or unfair just like saying Whites might be prejudiced and biased against Blacks is not necessarily irrational or unfair hostility against Whites. If you think I'm wrong, argue for it, but you shouldn't be able to dismiss it without any arguments.
First of all what is is inherently wrong with exclusion? Secondly "detriment" implies taking away from non Whites. White nationalists don't want to take anything away from non Whites.
First of all a severely disproportional percent of those White men are Jews who have ethnic interest totally at the opposite of Whites and have prejudices and biases against Whites. Secondy, what you just did is commit a logical fallacy. What use is people who control institutions happen to be White, if they are have either been brainwashed to not be on their own side, and aren't allowed to be on their own side? Imagine of of these White men make an explicitly pro White statement and see what happens to him. To see who rules over you see who you're not allowed to criticize.
Every single illegal alien is a criminal. Fact check true.
It's impossible for conservatives to win debates with liberals because they aren't allowed to make valid arguments against them because those have been artificially pushed out of acceptable range of ideas by people who happen to control the culture. Kamala can explicitly and unapologetically say "Black women are oppressed", but all Trump can do is dispute it, he can't reply "White men are oppressed" because that is "racist" and "sexist". Liberals rig the game and then falsely claim victory.
"White supremacists" are in reality White equalitarians and I mean that 100% seriously.