MovieChat Forums > OnanTheBarbarian > Replies
OnanTheBarbarian's Replies
Well then come out of the closet, sweetheart.
Kukuzu's post affirms everything I've been trying to tell you.
I really don't care about these heterosexual males who dress in women's clothes. It's not a human rights issue and has nothing to do with the LGBT struggle for equality.
My point in this thread is to draw a distinction between the majority of gay males who love being men and don't cross dress; the minority of gay males who dress in drag for fun and entertainment; and transgender women who were born male and now live as women.
That's all.
I'm not sure why you're so hostile.
Thank you and the reason I posted this parody is to explain the differences to people, which you have done quite clearly.
And yet "sodomites" and lesbians have been here since the dawn of time and the human race has not died out. Perhaps it's an evolutionary break on overpopulation. Who knows? But it's quite natural when it's between two consenting people so mind your own business.
Gay males who have anal intercourse are not playing with feces. And neither are heterosexual couples who do it as well. This is not a gay issue.
Disease spreads through all body fluids. You focus on one because you don't like gay people. No one has time for your peccadillo. We're too busy just living our lives.
I'm not trying to disparage trans people here. But you did get rather insulting. I'm trying to use this thread to discuss the differences with straight people.
From what I read here many of them are very confused, just as my sister was when I was a kid and she told me a homosexual was a man who wanted to be a woman.
I don't completely understand it. I just know it's a fetish which I don't take seriously. It's not the same as gay drag. And it's not transgender.
I don't see it as political like LGBT.
And it's very different than gay men who dress in drag.
I found a rather woke source which backs me up.
<blockquote>Here's exactly why the word 'transvestite' is offensive
'Transvestite' has largely been replaced by the term 'cross-dresser' which can apply to a person of any gender but typically refers to a heterosexual man who wears clothing traditionally associated with women.
https://www.sbs.com.au/topics/voices/article/2016/07/29/heres-exactly-why-word-transvestite-offensive</blockquote>
I started posting on IMDb 20 years ago as Gameboy. I was a strident unapologetic queer supremacist then as I still am now.
I was the Admin Platonic Caveman on filmboards for 4 years.
I left FB and I've been posting on MovieChat for about 7 months.
People know me. I am who I say I am. <i>Get used to it.</i>
Your agenda is to trample on me and my people because you're a breeder and we're queer.
You think we're gonna passively accept that? Don't be an idiot.
I'm sure that will be exciting. 🤣
I've read the Satanic Bible of course. It's really about libertarianism, sorta like Ayn Rand with horns. 🤣
Apparently Jenner has already had genital reassignment surgery. If he was faking it, I feel sorry for him.
I don't recall another member of the animal kingdom deep kissing as a prelude to intercourse either. We're humans, less driven by reproductive instinct, and more open to experimentation.
You frankly sound like one of those old school Christians who insist the missionary position is the only acceptable one.
The difference between the human anus and a dog's butt or pneumatic tube is that it is a human erogenous zone. It's natural for it to be sexualized.
And if you've performed cunnlingus you've consumed urine. Sorry to be so graphic, but you can't avoid bodily secretions during sex. And kissing a woman and drinking her saliva are very different things. You're objectifying human secretions out of context.
Anal intercourse is as old as humanity itself. We've done it forever.
Yeowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Quite honestly, it's a legitimate topic. Ticketsplease only provided me with a chance to do a parody which addressed the issue I want to discuss. Everyone has seen drag performers, RuPaul, et al.
I want everyone to understand the difference between drag and trans. I also think there are children confused that their homosexuality might make them trans.
Bro, my topic is coming from a genuine place.
Whatever you want to call it. They're straight men with a sexual fetish. Cross dressers is too broad a term.
I'm speaking more about men who wear women's clothes to party. I'm not talking about stage performance, per se.
I'm not trying to silence you, <i>bitch</i>. Don't dare try and silence me.
I was 10 years old, oh self-appointed spokesman for the community.
I had no clue what was a homosexual. I had heard the word occasionally and somehow knew it applied to me. I was sexually attracted to boys but had no idea what that was called. I just knew I had to keep it secret. I didn't need to hear straight fools tell me that all gay men dress in women's clothes. Even on this forum I've seen straight fools insist that all gay men like to dress in drag.
So what 10-year-old gay child knows anything about this stuff?
Did you when you were 10-years-old? I doubt it.
And you don't speak for me or all gay people. You're the clone whose voice is always heard. I'm giving the alternative which is drowned out by the chorus.
Here we have it. A straight person trying to tell me about my own community.
Real drag queens are almost always gay. I'm not talking about Robin Williams in "Mrs Doubtfire" or Jamie Foxx as Wanda on "In Living Color". Those men are not actually drag queens. And yes, it's a form of entertainment. But if you are gay as I am, and have been in enough gay bars, you'd know that there is always a drag queen or two, not transgender, who likes a night to "perform". It's a queer art form so to speak and has been for centuries.
Transvestites don't hang out with gays. They're straight men with a sexual fetish.
When you say "cross dressers" you're conflating transvestites with drag queen, since they're both men who identify as men. But transvestites and drag queens are very different.
And trans is as you described it.
And yes, that's what I'm saying in my OP.