space1999's Replies


Jaws Having 3 different wives will do this to you. Very moral. An upstanding citizen who once owned a casino that blew up. [quote] it’s still a good site for budgets, trailers, filming locations and actors…etc.[/quote] You have to pay for it now. So no it isn't. You have to be a PRO member. Another Amazon owned ruined Internet thing that isn't Amazon.com. It's exciting for sure. I will wait to see this either via streaming or dvd/blu-ray. But this has been a very fun month for box office junkies. A lot of fun non comic book movies...that's been awhile. I know we're having fun here. But the site really could be whole lot better. And IMDB? The whole reason the site exist is because those boards were shut down. There is nowhere else to seriously go...outside of Facebook. And there is NO reason why anyone should have to go to Google and enter: site:moviechat.org + in search This really is a goldmine of a website. Press hoopla? NO. There are zero books written about the troubled production of The Sicilian. By 1987...nobody really cared about Cimino outside of gossip columnist and papers like Hollywood Reporter and Variety who used to fantasize him as a legend among filmmakers. He was never really a Spielberg, Coppola, Lucas or even Friedkin. But the movie [The Sicilian] found itself, as a legitimate case docket; all the way into the U.S. court system. About it's only known for....and the casting of Christopher Lambert in the lead role. How's that audiobook going? I mean literally you cannot search the site for an actor/movie/director because there's nothing to work with on the site. There is no search bar. The owner of the site, Jim Smith died some years back. He was old when he died. That's why the whole site looks like something from 1999. And there's no search feature. Also...movie fans don't want to view the politics board via "latest post" because everyone there is a dick. And it's like SPAM! [quote] The only new character introduced who was in any way likeable was the doctor[/quote] Agree 100% Siskel & Ebert review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kidgMgDrjo Captured from the Internet from 6.11.2022: Alien³ (1992) : Rating: 6.4/10 · ‎295,584 Alien: Resurrection (1997) : Rating: 6.2/10 · ‎244,159 votes So not a big difference really. Still better than Resurrection. But everyone always says the film has aged well. But has it really? It's got like the same IMDB score. Very off... Not bad at all. Bubbathegut had to be trolling here: https://moviechat.org/tt8041270/Jurassic-World-Dominion/62a0c4b888883875edbb1ff0/Biggest-flop-of-the-summer [quote]Domestic: $185 m International: $315 m Total: $500 m[/quote] The research is #FAKE!! He's lying!! Aliensalmon don't have In-Laws! NEVER HAVE!! NEVER WILL!! A TRUMP HILLBILLIE FREAK :( :( Unless it marries a used doll from eBay. Staring at a plastic container full of water with just 2 fish floating left. #hopeuntilthenextinsurrection Everyone is laughing at Donald Trump because he's making fun of his own daughter. LOL!!! Calling her a cunt? stupid? fool? msg: to DIRK: You should be writing for TIME! [quote]More hooray: Dominion posted the second best opening day for a Jurassic movie with $59.55M, behind 2015’s Jurassic World ($81.9M) and ahead of Fallen Kingdom‘s $58.5M first day. Again, that $60M includes the $18M in previews.[/quote] What??