MovieChat Forums > TroyB > Replies
TroyB's Replies
Clark cannot change into Superman until he knocks off the other one. For that Clark renews Superman as a whole because their powers are split during the fight with Clark taking on more of it as the fight goes on and eventually he grabs all of it back to win the battle. Pretty simple.
Superman's father forbade him to interfere with human history. That was a prelude to what can happen when given the chance.
Hamlin is in critical condition as of right now. Hopefully he'll pull through.
I agree with you there. As stated from the start of my post, Two Face felt like it was shoehorned when it wasn't. Two Face was a fascinating take behind the Joker and should've had a bit more than just 15 minutes of fame. We gotten short changed as viewers in my opinion.
With another Batman universe created I doubt Nolan will ever return to the helm.
That's why I said the movie was about timing and taking risks. It was clear that Vincent didn't feel Max would pull the trigger. The sequence felt like a stall tactic, which Vincent ignored and then paid for it.
While I agree, the last 20 or so minutes of the movie did lose a bit of steam, it still closed out as expected: poetically.
Vincent was gonna shoot her but Max beat him to it. The movie is all about timing and taking risks. This seems to have floated over many heads.
OP is just another troll. They seem to be everywhere vying for attention.
The killers went after her because she was alone, vulnerable, and they needed a guinea pig to get started.
The sequel came out exactly a year later in November.
Part 2 was serious, true, but made the least sense story wise. The original has some small funny moments but not a comedy whatsoever. It seems to become more silly the longer the series went.
In the original screenplay its said that Peter Vincent was going to call the cops but the phone wire was cut so he got desperate and went upstairs to let Mrs. Brewster know about Charlie. It was clear Peter Vincent was terrified and a bit disoriented at this point.
Exactly. After first reading the original post I thought it was a troll, but now that I've read further, it seems to be a misunderstanding. Clark Kent had to stop the lowlife Superman. That's the point of his existence. While true Clark probably didn't really want to fight the tougher Superman as he still held the edge over the more human version Clark Kent, but over time, their powers began to do a mild shift. Clark knew it and held on fast. By the end of the battle, Clark got all his powers back and Superman was just a shell of his former self. It had to happen this way. Superman had to reform. So no, Clark could not let him get away like that.
I showed both movies to my nephew and he enjoyed both but was more moved by the original and cried at the end when Daniel won. Obviously to me the original felt more authentic to him with more heart and like was said by a previous post, stands the test of time.
Yea definitely some obvious trolling in this thread. I respect other people and their opinions but to call something as overrated junk without explaining how it is from your perspective is seeking attention and not to be taken seriously.
If a woman feels attracted and also desired by a man, after spending a few days talking to him, they make up their minds that they know him good enough to sleep with. This is quite a common practice even today.
Karen's reaction was comedy on purpose. The Howling is a horror comedy after all. Seeing how Eddie kept saying "Look, Karen, keep looking." then he takes his sweet time turning into a werewolf shows this, as does many other scenes.
Matt appearing to tackle the T-800 might've been a plot hole, but then again, so would the T-800 getting blown backwards from a shotgun. The only real explanation is that we don't know how much the cyborgs are supposed to weigh.
No he shouldn't reappear. But I agree with the others above having Dewey take out one of the killers midway through the movie to eventually die from his wounds. The movie can then focus on the motives of the dead killer, trying to link him or her to a potential second killer later on.
The movie was decent but not one kill was interesting. Just the usual slice and dice. Plus none of these sequels have been able to top the original, which was the most relevant.