MovieChat Forums > einsteinfountain > Replies
einsteinfountain's Replies
Killing Mike? With Walt you have a long list of things he did that were disgusting.
I have no idea it is my favorite food.
Opinion, nothing more.
Cool story. I find it funny you think movies and art are objective.
Last crusade has great writing, great pacing, great dialogue, and great humor. Therefore it is objectively a great film lol. Quite simple I will use your reasoning and just turn it the other way. The ignorance is strong in you.
All you gave was opinion no objective facts. You tried to pass off your opinions as objective facts. Ignorant on your end. Also you quoted it wrong lol.
<blockquote>Your concession is accepted</blockquote>
Concession on what?
No you didn't you gave your opinion on why you think it is bad. All of what you said can be dismissed with an opposing opinion. An objective fact can not be disputed. I made no such claim a movie is objectively good or bad you did and you failed to back up that claim.
Show me the criteria used then. One that is universally accepted as truth.
In your opinion.
All of what you said was opinion. What if someone said in my opinion Last Crusade has great pacing, great dialogue, greatly written characters, and I find childish humor great? You can't say they are wrong because it is based off of opinion.
Is this a universally accepted criteria?
You were the one that said it is objectively a bad film. I made no claim movies were objective you did. So what is the criteria you used to determine it being objectively bad?
By what standard? Movies and art are objective? Are you the person who determines what is good or bad?
If he were being honest? So you can read his mind? So it is impossible for him to think Last Crusade is a good film?
I agree.
Agreed. It is not perfect by any means but good grief at least it is a competent film.
Why would I say people are not fair to the prequels in the same post? If I left them out and was only referring to the Disney films you would have a case I did no such thing.
Good glad to know you can actually give Rogue and and the Mandalorian credit. Everything else has been a joke. The prequels were not good either though. Perfect example of great ideas and concepts, originality but not executed well. Had the ideas been executed well it could have been really solid. Thing is the Disney trilogy was not that it was executed badly it is that the ideas of the story sucked to begin with. Nothing more than a bad fanfiction. Even if executed better it would still suck.
I fail to see how TFA was more enjoyable than Rogue One. An unlikable lead that is overpowered, paced way too fast, constant reliance on nostalgia flash backs, Also no risk taken a perfect producer's film. Rogue One was not great but at least it did not break continuity, have an unlikable overpowered lead nor rely nearly as much on nostalgia.
Can't agree on that one. While I am not huge on Burton's vision I infinitely prefer it over Schumacher's. However to each his own.
Which is why I said the same thing about the prequels as well right? Your selective hearing and cherry picking my post showcases blind bias that I am referring to.
TFA was received well by the general audience so using that does not help your case. That was a nostalgia cash grab and people ate it up. Thing is these new wave of haters openly will say Rogue One and Mandalorian were trash. Just as you do about TFA. Which for the record I do not like the main trilogy story-line in the Disney series so do no assume I like these films. I am not big on Star Wars as a whole but can admit the originals were at least competent in story telling.