MovieChat Forums > SolarisPatchwork > Replies
SolarisPatchwork's Replies
Yes, the corrupt city officials who gaslight and laugh at the residents literally begging for help. https://x.com/DefiyantlyFree/status/1833968379243495764
The state is now sending in state troopers along with millions in funding to help, but I'm sure you'll just say that's a conspiracy theory.
"Don't look at the testimony of citizens of that town pleading with their local city council about what they saw and to do something about it...That's second-hand information. Instead you should believe what the editors say in The New York Times."
>And there was mention of segregation and racism, what are you on about?
lol no
Find me an interview with her where she mentions racism, segregation, or sexism.
She talks about how it was unusual for girls to be in the programs, but she wanted to do it and got two job offers on the same day.
"I asked permission to go. And they said, 'well, the girls don't usually go,' so I said, 'Well, is there a law?' They said no, so I said, 'well, so then my boss, I gotta go.'" Such a barrier. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8gJqKyIGhE
All the videos that mention racism or sexism are slop that has nothing to do with what she's saying, as voiceovers and modern projections, like this from National Geographic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4j_LpKzcZQ
Hollywood pumps out slop and rewrites history, and idiots eat it up.
The events in the film are fictional. There was no coffee pot incident. No one told her she couldn't use the bathroom--the signage was state mandated and no one at NASA believed in it, nor was it ever an issue.
Johnson in all these interviews seems to just like talking about the computing (manual number crunching) she did, and she doesn't discuss all the crap that's projected onto her through our modern lens.
>lol, you're so weird!
Oh, stop flirting
>Trump brags about sexually assaulting women as a perk of wealth.
No, he bragged about consensual sexual activity.
>The court said he is a rapist.
The court also said his $500M home is worth $5M and therefore he owes the government $500M for some reason, even though he paid back the private loan, with interest.
>He was not successful as president.
Mmmhm he's sooo unsuccessful
>1. How did Trump's tax break for the wealthy put the needs of the people first?
I'm not wealthy and benefited massively. Under Democrats the price of food is up 134%.
>3. The people Trump sexually assaulted do not love him, probably.
Didn't happen
>7. He made his money with loans from his father and the hard work of others. But is slowly pissing away his business empire through mismanagement.
Seething at someone else's success, lol
>8. Trump's only real success for far is avoiding prison.
Performative contradiction. If you really thought he wasn't successful you wouldn't be pulling your hair out and beating your chest over how much you hate him
I'm talking about the line where they mention they dated in the past
I'm not so sure American audiences care about that, but the people making and funding the films sure do, to the point where if you don't tick the right boxes your career will be over.
I mean you'd also think that WWII was fought over the Holocaust, that the Western front was particularly important, and that the US was the deciding factor. In reality no one knew or cared about what was happening to Germany's political prisoners (Jewish and otherwise), and the Western front was a distraction compared to the monumental scale of carnage going on in the Eastern front.
Of course everything has been framed through the lens of our culture, even when it's a complete 180 from how it was at the time.
They dated and it fell apart, they both knew it was over. He didn't even express interest in her romantically; he seemed to have moved on.
Lisa needs braces.
As if you'd pray and think
She must have some serious issues to hate men that much
I take it you don't listen to his speeches
>So which news sources do you trust? Do they have a name?
Why would I want your judgment in a thread where you admit that you won't look at primary source documents? What value do you think you can add after that public demonstration?
They don't remember him. The leftist attempted assassination of Trump received 1/1000th the mainstream media airtime than the completely fake and absurd conspiracy theory that Trump ordered Russia to hack our elections (which was used as pretext to spy on him and his family, an incalculably worse crime than Nixon trying to coverup the CIA break-in of the DNC).
"I'm rubber and you're glue. Whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you."
Did they teach you to think with that retort in your turn of the century schoolhouse? Maybe you should take some neotropics, regain some brain plasticity, and reexamine your ancient thinking regarding not trusting documents from the FBI just because they're "tweeted" (scary term--think of it like a baseball card of a white player clothespinned near bicycle spokes) by a CEO on Twitter and not The New York Times.
>NOOO you can't link to X. Show me a source from The New York Times!
See? Boomer
>What makes you think your post with the link to X is the absolute truth?
What link to X? I linked to the CEO of Gab sharing a document from the FBI.
Or is this a situation where "it depends on what the definition of 'the' is."
>Is retard your usual response to people who doubt your posts?
No, otherwise I would've used it as soon as you doubted it. Instead I responded with primary source evidence. What do _you_ think made me use it?
>I think I don't care if you're a zoomer or not.
Thinking is a good start. Keep going
>So we only have his word on the matter?
Considering I went out of my way to directly link you to the evidence, you could at least attempt to hide your retardation
>Maybe, are you a zoomer?
What do you think?