MovieChat Forums > Ranb > Replies
Ranb's Replies
Carlson's rant is not actually up for debate. He actually said that crap and never returned to his claims to clarify them.
I'm actually more conservative than liberal.
That cock Carlson doesn't have a chance. He is a known liar and lacks the integrity to make any claim of his in court stick.
Which of his laughably childish questions did you think were intriguing? I've asked Carlson supporters before about this video, but they are too spineless to be specific.
Oh,so you're one of those people that thinks they decide what a gun is and not the federal government or the president. You understand that your position makes no sense at all right?
Trump says bump stocks are firearms. Are you calling Trump a liar? Do you think that the president does not have the power to create new regulations to enforce existing laws?
Why do you think anyone, GOP or Democrat will oppose red flag laws? The GOP was too busy kissing Trump's ass to oppose his insane "take the guns 1st, due process 2nd".
I don't want to see a national red flag law, but the GOP will probably favor them.
So then his questions are just stupid, which makes Carlson stupid? No, Carlson is looking to hang some blame for the shooting on someone else other than Paddock.
Is that all black people or just some black people?
When I read your posts, you make it seem like you are under some sort of obligation to watch this TV series and it offends you. It would make more sense for you to just watch something else.
He who? I said Carlson's audience was racist. I did not say Carlson was racist.
Do you adhere to the "one drop rule"? Or if a person can pass as white, is it good enough for you? Why would you care if you identify them as black?
Nikol Kollars is part Asian, Kim Adis is Filipino, Chipo Chung is half Chinese. You didn't actually watch this series at all did you.
I had to look at her Wikipedia page to know who she is. She does not appear to be a good person either.
Sure he can. But why do it in a way that makes him seem clueless? Carlson wanted to make the Vegas shooting all about his anti-muslim anti-immigrant stance. His rant was mostly people who were not responsible for the deaths that day.
He wanted to blame anyone other than a white guy who might have been an alt-right fanatic.
I've read that before and it makes sense. But some people are using it to describe completely benign issues that they have a problem with.
People like to say that the jury was afraid or threatened; with no evidence at all. Not a single juror has gone on record as saying they were influenced by what was happening in the streets on in the media.
It will not be people like Duke who ever have anything to do with improving life in the USA.
There is nothing wrong with pointing out libelous claims by known liars such as Tucker Carlson.
Trump said it was a gun grab. That is how he accomplished it. He ordered the DOJ to amend the CFR to classify bump stocks as contraband machine guns. Because Reagan signed the 1986 law that prohibited registration of new machine guns, bump stocks became contraband and had to be turned in or destroyed within 90 days after Trump banned them in 2018.
People who say Trump is not a gun grabber are willfully ignorant, liar or something else, like stupid.
Are you talking about the red flag laws that Pence wanted? He wanted due process to ensure that only the bad people lost their guns. Trump said no, he wanted to take the guns first, due process second. You ever watch the C-span video of him spewing this nonsense? Feinstein was sitting right next to him. Even she looked like she thought it was a stupid idea.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4716589/user-clip-trump-take-guns-first-due-process-second
You have a point. Carlson never followed up on his libelous claims either. He was just happy enough to cast doubt on a person who was doing his job for some reason. In other words, he cares for ratings more than his personal integrity.
I'd make myself scare if the media was libeling me for just doing my job while someone else was killing people.
That is a really low bar then. I draw the line at lying, period. Which means I don't really trust anyone and look into anything anyone in the media says.
I should be surprised that anyone should trust a liar, even a little bit, under any circumstances. But these days I'm not because as long as "your" liar agrees with you sometimes, it's "okay" to not have any integrity at all.
He is preaching to the choir. He is still a racist turd.
Why do you give a damn about ratings when Carlson has no integrity? Remember, Carlson lies because he thinks you're stupid. Let that sink in.
Lots of people approved of Clinton's AWB back in 1994. Clinton is still an anti-gun dork just like Trump. At least the AWB had a grandfather clause so no one had to turn in their guns. By classifying bump stocks as contraband machine guns, Trump was able to ensure he screwed people out of their property without compensation.
Do you think it was liberal Democrats that owned most of the bump stocks? Of course not. It was mostly right wing supporters of the right to keep and bear arms. Trump's gun grab was a big "kiss my ass" to his supporters. But most of them are still stupid enough to support him.
Just because left and right wing anti-gun zealots supported the gun grab does not make Trump pro-gun. Trump is a gun grabber. This means he is just another anti-gun politician.
Trump was the one that used his authority as head of the executive branch to ban bump stocks. It was not forced upon him. Even if Congress had passed a bump stock ban, Trump could have vetoed it. But no, Trump went out of his way to order that the Code of Federal Regulations classify bump stocks as contraband machine guns.
This anti-gun insanity started back in 1934 with passage of the National Firearms Act signed by FDR (D). It required registration, a $200 tax, ATF authorization and the local sheriff's signature on the registration form for a non-licensee to make or transfer a machine gun, silencer or other NFA firearm.
In 1986 the Firearm Owner Protection Act was signed by Reagan (R). It contained the Hughes Amendment which banned the registration of new machine guns by unlicensed civilians. That is why all machine guns owned by non-licensees are at least 35 years old and most cost over $10,000.
In 2016 the Obama administration eliminated the sheriff's signature on the tax stamp application. This eliminated the most common obstacle to owning machine guns and other NFA firearms in the USA by individuals. Obama's action was the most significant pro-gun regulation or law change since the 2004 sunset of the AWB of 1994.
What was Trump's biggest thing regarding gun control? He had the CFR amended to screw over as many as 500,000 law abiding Americans by taking or destroying their property without compensation. While the 6th circuit court invalidated the ban, this is not nation-wide. The judges that Trump put on the Supreme court have not done a damn thing for gun owners as far as the bump stock ban is concerned. Even if the courts reverse Trump's gun grab, Trump is still a vile gun grabber.
This is how Trump grabs gun owners by the pussy. He is proud of that crap.