MovieChat Forums > Ranb > Replies
Ranb's Replies
What would you do if armed men chased you and eventually caught up? Defend yourself or be their bitch? What other options do you think you would have?
So if a man chases after you with a gun, you will claim to forfeit your right to self defense just because you're the one being chased?
Anyone can talk to anyone else. You're not allowed to gun them down after chasing them and then brandishing a shotgun at them.
Arbury would have been a fool to stop and talk to anyone who was not law enforcement that night, especially the ones chasing him in a truck while armed. I don't think you are actually that stupid.
It is one thing to chase someone for thinking they were trespassing on private property, it is quite another to hit them with a vehicle then shoot them with a shotgun while they are trying to evade or defend themselves.
It is was not illegal for Arbury to run away from armed people chasing him in a pickup; it was entirely sensible for Arbury to do so. It would have been stupid to just let those three men detain him for any reason.
Just because the McMichaels thought they were legally allowed to arrest a person for some crime they did not witness (there is no GA law that says they can) does not mean they were actually allowed to do so. Since there was no felony crime committed (until the McMichaels chased and killed Arbury), they had no to attempt to arrest Arbury. Since they did not witness any crime that day (other than their own) they did not have any reason to attempt to arrest Arbury.
Why is no one stating the obvious that Arbury also had a right to defend himself against armed men who were chasing after him?
I think the plan that day was to chase down Arbury then get his murder on video so they could brag about it.
joej2923, if you're going to claim that these men had a right to arrest anyone that day, show us the law as it existed back then to prove that you know what you're talking about.
How would anyone spin shooting someone over counterfeit money into self-defense?
How did Trump save lives? Trump lies frequently. He kept on saying the pandemic would just go away, it didn't. https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2020/11/11/trump-predicted-covid-covid-covid-would-end-after-the-election-its-worse-than-ever/?sh=41daa5fd6512
I think you're just pulling my leg.
Trump says bump stocks are machine guns. Are you telling me Trump is a liar?
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2018-12-26/pdf/2018-27763.pdf
I work for a living and don't have time to watch it on TV. I have not formed on opinion as to his guilt or innocence. I should be able to comment on what people say in the trial without people losing their shit.
Well, I get that you would feel this way if there were no whites in the USA who are turds.
He was not one of those who bragged about sexualizing his daughter.
So the law means nothing to you at all? Trump used the code of Federal Regulations to define a bump stock as a machine gun. Does this make Trump stupid?
Probably the same attitude that Rittenhouse used to justify shooting three people.
I'm just repeating what Grosskreutz said in court. You don't have to believe him.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/08/us/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-monday/index.html
Didn't he say that he was reacting to an active shooter?
Military benefits are not free. The taxpayers pay for them. There were always strings attached for the things I got while serving in the military
He intentionally aimed and shot his rifle at three people. He intentionally killed two people. There is no reason to sugar coat this incident. He might be able to convince the jury that it was self defense.
A killer kills people. Rittenhouse claims to have killed two people. This makes him a killer.
Not really, Blade Runner was better than the book, Do Androids dream of Electric Sheep.
Some people are opposed to idol worship. This is why they will also not say the pledge of allegiance. It's that pesky 1st Amendment and freedom of religion that gets in the way of people making those "non-believers" bow to their whims.
I think you want to root for the people who were shot, just too chicken to admit it. So instead you suggest that I am, even though I've limited my comments to the character or lack thereof of Rittenhouse..
My line of thinking is that Rittenhouse may or may not testify.
Your line of thinking is that someone (you?) needs to root for the people Rittenhouse shot.