MovieChat Forums > Kyle Rittenhouse Discussion > Kid's not a killer

Kid's not a killer

posted 3 years ago by almonigal (1295)
7 replies | jump to latest

Immature, yes. Naive, yes. Looking for trouble, probably. But as far as I can tell, he did his best to avoid conflict. But it's clear he didnt go out with the intention to kill someone.

[–] Ranb (11382) 3 years ago

A killer kills people. Rittenhouse claims to have killed two people. This makes him a killer.

[–] almonigal (1295) 3 years ago

per definition , yes. per intention, no

[–] Ranb (11382) 3 years ago

He intentionally aimed and shot his rifle at three people. He intentionally killed two people. There is no reason to sugar coat this incident. He might be able to convince the jury that it was self defense.

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

Right. Gotcha. He just happens to be present 40 miles from his hometown with an assault rifle

[–] almonigal (1295) 3 years ago

As I said, kid was probably looking for trouble. Also, that "anyone needs medical" screaming does not fool anyone. That was textbook crap. He was asking for it and covering his ass. But if he wasn't attacked, at least 2 people would be alive today. Anyway, sort your shit out, you have a piece of shit country in which cops are paid contract killers, sick people are getting fucked by the medical mafia and all ur friends are getting kicked out of their houses by stock brokers with complicity of police. Im just standing on the side and being amazed. Ur country seems so sideways from where I'm standing ... maybe just because im sitting on my side ...

[–] liscarkat (19447) 3 years ago

He shot people who were pursuing him with the obvious intent to harm or even kill him. He had a right to defend himself, and he did the world a favor by ridding it of a couple of pieces of scum.

[–] almonigal (1295) 3 years ago

Not pieces of scum, just kids getting carried away. Mob mentality is a dangerous thing.