MovieChat Forums > fc31 > Replies
fc31's Replies
TVA is not corrupt. To be corrupt you have to do all this for personal gain or profit, I don't see anything like that. Oppressive, maybe, to be point of ridiculousness.
Loki was already redeemed in infinity war when he tried to save his brother and assassinated Thanos.
Loki is always going to be Loki, he is always going to have an angle, that is why he was so interesting.
But he was supposed to possess superior intelligence, full of tricks and deceptions, not a buffoon like what we saw in the pilot.
I don't reject the premise of the show, but it should have been done in an intelligent way, but obviously not enough talent and resources are involved in this show. The low budget is shown clearly in the pilot.
Loki did not even travel in time, only in space by using space stone, so his only crime was he did not go to prison as he supposed to. And if he was guilty shouldn't the timeline have been erased and endgame story gone?
So it seems anything or anyone stopped avengers to succeed is guilty, I can only imagine some sort of nepotism is in play or Stan Lee is running TVA.
The entire thing is just stupid.
And starts a food delivery business.
I think that is the point of the show. Rory did not mean any of them to happen, but they just happened. I don't think she seduced Dean, both of them were clearly at fault. Heart of a young girl is a fickle thing, I think that is what it is about. Rory is also ambitious, everything else is just byproduct of boredom.
She is also awful to her grandparents, but then again they do have problems of their own.
The popularity of show dropped I don't think was because of Rory, but her mother and her mother's break up with Luke.
Tiffani Thiessen is 47 and she is still hot, at least that is what I think, though she is more of an exception rather than the rule.
No, but black community of Russia is about 0.035% of Russian population, so I think my statement is appropriate.
I think it is more than that. She also felt differently in the beginning, being sexualised was more flattering when she was younger, she felt good about all the attention and being desired.
But then I think she became more accomplished and her social standing also rose with fame, she attended charity functions, high society gatherings and circles and I think by then she wanted to be treated more than just a hot piece of ass or even more than just an actress.
A woman asking that is less likely interpreted as sexual, more likely a curiosity and about comfort and welfare of actors, the question is likely phrased differently. A man asking that is just sleaze and perversion, there is no other interpretation.
Well, I can't believe he really had the balls to ask that, that was so sleazy and inappropriate. I think it would be different for a woman to ask similar questions.
Do you really believe a male reporter or even a male could or even dare to ask such questions? So it is not everyone.
LGBT community is clearly under represented in the movie. I am not see Scarlett Johansson kissing any women at all in the trailer.
She is supposed to be Russian, and there is almost like zero black people in Russia.
And he has to apologize afterwards, for saying there is sexism against men as well in film industry.
How could he have said that? There is clearly never and never will be sexism against men. We all know all women are totally without prejudice.
What a sore loser.
Is that what feminists say when they failed to come out with an argument, making gay insults? Of course that is totally not offensive to LGBT community simply because you are a feminist.
And that statement is totally without prejudice, nothing to do with the fact both men and women love to watch good looking men doing heroic staff.
Nothing to do with subjective wishful thinking, and it supported by countless clear evidence, so clear nobody can see it other than the people with feminist agenda.
And that is totally not about making a profit, we all know film industry and business people never cared about profit, they are only in it to promote the power of men.
And his skin tight cloth, totally not about objectification of men.
It is totally not degrading since he is a man. He should take it as a compliment, and that is absolutely not sexist.
Of course men would never be sexualised, for example Captain America, totally not.